StarGateWars Forums

Big Brother wrote:SSG Enter The Lion Wrote

So while these issues were brewing for a while, the decision to disband was sudden and came up as part of the solution to create a smaller super alliance. We have left the door open for the EPA to rejoin the collective not because of some sense of sympathy but because we DO respect our brothers in the EPA and value their friendships. Sometimes hard decisions have to be made and someone gets hurt. For that I apologise.

PS: While I did come up with the name Paragon..my suggestion was Paragons of War.

Above is from ETL's own thread
http://herebegames.com/StarGateWars/vie ... hp?t=46374
The Formation of the Coalition of Paragons

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Big Brother wrote:SSG Enter The Lion Wrote

So while these issues were brewing for a while, the decision to disband was sudden and came up as part of the solution to create a smaller super alliance. We have left the door open for the EPA to rejoin the collective not because of some sense of sympathy but because we DO respect our brothers in the EPA and value their friendships. Sometimes hard decisions have to be made and someone gets hurt. For that I apologise.

PS: While I did come up with the name Paragon..my suggestion was Paragons of War.

Above is from ETL's own thread
http://herebegames.com/StarGateWars/vie ... hp?t=46374
The Formation of the Coalition of Paragons

So who cares! The Foundation fought Omega..not the GA..therefore are held to Omega's terms.

compmage wrote:The threaty was with the GA, which no longer exists.

The treaty restricts alliance that Robe creates, not leads, and since TF was already in existance and she just toke over leadership, the treaty is not applicable, even if the GA did still exist or if the treaty had been with Omega and not the GA.

compmage wrote:The threaty was with the GA, which no longer exists.

The treaty restricts alliance that Robe creates, not leads, and since TF was already in existance and she just toke over leadership, the treaty is not applicable, even if the GA did still exist or if the treaty had been with Omega and not the GA.

Kjarkur wrote:

compmage wrote:The threaty was with the GA, which no longer exists.

The treaty restricts alliance that Robe creates, not leads, and since TF was already in existance and she just toke over leadership, the treaty is not applicable, even if the GA did still exist or if the treaty had been with Omega and not the GA.

That's REALLY LOW mate! IMO you are stabbing Omega in the back by 'bending' the treaty!

I don't care what the treaty says that's low.

Vendetta wrote:loopholes my friend loopholes

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:http://herebegames.com/StarGateWars/vie ... hp?t=41749


Does it say GA or Omega..the war was for the breaking of terms. If Robe really had wanted to heal things she would have approached us. Many who have once been our enemies are now friends, but it is a matter of healing, not just breaking agreements behind people's backs.

Kjarkur wrote:

compmage wrote:The threaty was with the GA, which no longer exists.

The treaty restricts alliance that Robe creates, not leads, and since TF was already in existance and she just toke over leadership, the treaty is not applicable, even if the GA did still exist or if the treaty had been with Omega and not the GA.

That's REALLY LOW mate! IMO you are stabbing Omega in the back by 'bending' the treaty!

I don't care what the treaty says that's low.

Kjarkur wrote:

Vendetta wrote:loopholes my friend loopholes

And Omega should just ignore that?

NO !

REK wrote:actually the TF was left in peace by Omega after the last was that involved only omega and the TF AFTER THE GA war and stated that the TF would no longer be attacked and Omega would accept the syrrender if Robe NEVER lead an alliance again..