Page 5 of 6
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 4:54 pm
by Tanith
Oo wow never had a thread of mined stickied before
Thanks Zeratul
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 7:51 pm
by TheWay
lol we dont even sticky his threads in the alliance he is War Commander of lol JK JK
Its a good idea and I voted yes if admin can add an entirely new and useless realm then they should be able to do something helpful as well. Ok that was a little mean but still
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 8:18 pm
by timex
Good idea man , should be added.
Re: Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 12:34 pm
by Chris M
Tanith1 wrote:I have a suggestion regarding alliance administration. I think that it should be possible to either set as many 2nds as you want or (and more desireably) to give permissions out on a person, by person basis. Allowing new people into the alliance, removing them, alliance-wide messaging etc.. (Each permission can be given out individually to greater improve flexibility) This would mainly benefit those alliances that have High Councils or more than 2 people that should have admin powers.
I was also thinking about setting different ranks that the alliance could give out that would either go in place of your title (Supreme Commander, Fleet Commander, General, etc..) or in addition to it.
This would further develop what the alliance can actually do ingame as far as administration.
Edit: Grammatical corrections.
improves alliance function and replaces the useless "first prime" feature
"two birds with but one stone" as Teal'c would say
Re: Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:13 pm
by Tanith
I've had this up here for a while...wonder if Admin has taken a look yet.
Re: Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:33 pm
by Zeratul
he probably has... he is in the process of a major alliance update... so parts of this is quite likely to be included...
Re: Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:57 pm
by ThorSupreme
i like it
Re:
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:12 pm
by Milamber
timex wrote:Good idea man , should be added.
Indeed.
It would allow alliances to be more, well, alliance-like, in their management, messaging, and structure.
Does that make sense?
Re: Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 4:04 pm
by Dagr
More structured alliance I think is what your trying to say.
Re: Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:32 am
by Mukasa
i love it! i really really love it! i missed this all the time! these suggestions are one of best i heard in long time..though i'm kinda late on posting..lol
Re: Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:30 am
by Cerberus
Sounds great, I also like the idea of the alliance custom ranks... hope they bring it in!
Re: Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:20 am
by manchild
sounds good to me
Re: Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:35 am
by Gepard
Maybe they should add among main buttons like training, command center, technology, etc. also "alliance" button where members of the certain alliance could read what their alliance leader (or 2nd in command) wrote like: relations, alliance tasks, important personel in the alliance, some important links and so on... I believe that this could be used as greater bond between the members and their leaders as many are forum inactive.
Re: Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:48 pm
by Catastrophe
sounds like a solid idea! if it hasnt been said can a alaince button on the side bar be implemented, it would make them more interactive.
Re: Further Developed Alliance Settings
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:26 am
by .L.
i like it i think it should be added