Page 5 of 6
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 6:30 am
by geisha
S T I wrote:geisha wrote:S T I wrote:Bluefox21 wrote:I am gonna report ye all to the anti competition board ( dammit im doing my business exam in three weeks and I cant think of the word when a certain number of ppl set a price

) lolI have no prob with ppl refusing to pay over a certain limit but I think massing ppl who charge the high prices is a bit extreme sale and demand theory if someone wants to pay 25 bill per k why not let them. Think if you mass it does kinda slip into the extortion bracket (just offering my opinion)

monopoly

wrong, a monopoly would be when there's only 1 person offering turns and setting the prices.... since there's a few doing it it would be an oligopoly

pwned ya both

double pwned
a monopoly can be a group which force or set a price to either stay/rise or fall, its just another name for trying to control

a monopoly doesn't need to be one person, it can be a group as long as the group it speaking with 1 voice and setting 1 price and are the only ones offering the goods in demand. In an oligopoly there are several (but very few) groups (or individuals) offering the goods that are in high demand... independently...
triple pwned?

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 6:52 am
by ~Artanis~
phantomx wrote:That's your choice, You wanna be smartass thinking you will get me to lower my prices of buying UU then you try it, either way I will always buy higher than what anyone is selling/buying for and threatening to mass them would e funny i'll just make them do private trades so

Im not buying for some time anyways got to wait like 1-2 days for paypal to transfer from debit to account then ill concider it again
If i had the naq id buy 900b for 1m its no loss
No i will néot force you to be at lower rates,but just think of it,you challenged Nigatsu and starting to piss me off aswell.
where will be the point when you will buy resources when some players will mass it away??????
i mean if there will be 4 or 5 people that will be enough to mass your CASH that you put into the game for resources,the more they are,the less loses for each of them.
Nigatsu you have my support when phantom BECOMES LG,if u still are interested in massing him.
the game wont be much fun for you when you wont be able to build a decent def

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 6:55 am
by ~Artanis~
geisha wrote:S T I wrote:geisha wrote:S T I wrote:Bluefox21 wrote:I am gonna report ye all to the anti competition board ( dammit im doing my business exam in three weeks and I cant think of the word when a certain number of ppl set a price

) lolI have no prob with ppl refusing to pay over a certain limit but I think massing ppl who charge the high prices is a bit extreme sale and demand theory if someone wants to pay 25 bill per k why not let them. Think if you mass it does kinda slip into the extortion bracket (just offering my opinion)

monopoly

wrong, a monopoly would be when there's only 1 person offering turns and setting the prices.... since there's a few doing it it would be an oligopoly

pwned ya both

double pwned
a monopoly can be a group which force or set a price to either stay/rise or fall, its just another name for trying to control

a monopoly doesn't need to be one person, it can be a group as long as the group it speaking with 1 voice and setting 1 price and are the only ones offering the goods in demand. In an oligopoly there are several (but very few) groups (or individuals) offering the goods that are in high demand... independently...
triple pwned?

this is getting exciting,4 times pwned lmao
Lets get it to 100 times pwned,i dare ya

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 7:09 am
by geisha
Nah... probably time for geisha to stop being a smartass before S T I gives her a spanking

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 7:16 am
by Munchy
I just did some math, and based on prices at 700 mil/k, and personal growth at .790040414% per day, and with exponential growth, I could double my army every 87.7365 days, based on income/buying alone. Not including UP, and any 'extra' I may make by raiding. Not saying I actually will, but I could.
But anyway, based on that theory, players should double their growth every 3-4 months, right? Well that means prices also would jump every 3-4 months. I remember one year ago prices were 300-350 mil/k. Given the time it isn't surprising that they have doubled and even tripled.
If anyone is interested in the math
I took my daily income and divided it by 700,000. I then took that number and divided it by by my entire army size to get 'k'
y=yoekt is the formula, with y being the end value, yo being your start, k being your growth per day, and t being your days.
In the model below all I wanted was to double my starting size, so y became 2, and yo became 1, I didn't include the 1 because it wasn't needed.
2=e0.0.007900404t
ln2=0.007900404t
t=(ln2)/0.007900404
t=87.735656 days
It would vary depending on your % of miners to your total army size(better % of miners, faster growth...) Also UP makes a difference.
It doesn't factor in changes in prices on the market, but you could just pick a higher number. Like if I picked 900 mil per k, it would be 112 days to double size, still not counting anything else. That would better match the rise in prices.
Just some food for thought.
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 7:25 am
by S T I
geisha wrote:S T I wrote:geisha wrote:S T I wrote:Bluefox21 wrote:I am gonna report ye all to the anti competition board ( dammit im doing my business exam in three weeks and I cant think of the word when a certain number of ppl set a price

) lolI have no prob with ppl refusing to pay over a certain limit but I think massing ppl who charge the high prices is a bit extreme sale and demand theory if someone wants to pay 25 bill per k why not let them. Think if you mass it does kinda slip into the extortion bracket (just offering my opinion)

monopoly

wrong, a monopoly would be when there's only 1 person offering turns and setting the prices.... since there's a few doing it it would be an oligopoly

pwned ya both

double pwned
a monopoly can be a group which force or set a price to either stay/rise or fall, its just another name for trying to control

a monopoly doesn't need to be one person, it can be a group as long as the group it speaking with 1 voice and setting 1 price and are the only ones offering the goods in demand. In an oligopoly there are several (but very few) groups (or individuals) offering the goods that are in high demand... independently...
triple pwned?

stipoly, is an idea, group,/fact, which i make up & it applies to anything I want it too,
& i never Googled it
so pwned u

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 7:31 am
by geisha
S T I wrote:geisha wrote:S T I wrote:geisha wrote:S T I wrote:Bluefox21 wrote:I am gonna report ye all to the anti competition board ( dammit im doing my business exam in three weeks and I cant think of the word when a certain number of ppl set a price

) lolI have no prob with ppl refusing to pay over a certain limit but I think massing ppl who charge the high prices is a bit extreme sale and demand theory if someone wants to pay 25 bill per k why not let them. Think if you mass it does kinda slip into the extortion bracket (just offering my opinion)

monopoly

wrong, a monopoly would be when there's only 1 person offering turns and setting the prices.... since there's a few doing it it would be an oligopoly

pwned ya both

double pwned
a monopoly can be a group which force or set a price to either stay/rise or fall, its just another name for trying to control

a monopoly doesn't need to be one person, it can be a group as long as the group it speaking with 1 voice and setting 1 price and are the only ones offering the goods in demand. In an oligopoly there are several (but very few) groups (or individuals) offering the goods that are in high demand... independently...
triple pwned?

stipoly, is an idea, group,/fact, which i make up & it applies to anything I want it too,
& i never Googled it
so pwned u

ROFL I herewith officially declare S T I the winner of our smartass pwnage duel

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 7:36 am
by S T I
geisha wrote:S T I wrote:geisha wrote:S T I wrote:geisha wrote:S T I wrote:Bluefox21 wrote:I am gonna report ye all to the anti competition board ( dammit im doing my business exam in three weeks and I cant think of the word when a certain number of ppl set a price

) lolI have no prob with ppl refusing to pay over a certain limit but I think massing ppl who charge the high prices is a bit extreme sale and demand theory if someone wants to pay 25 bill per k why not let them. Think if you mass it does kinda slip into the extortion bracket (just offering my opinion)

monopoly

wrong, a monopoly would be when there's only 1 person offering turns and setting the prices.... since there's a few doing it it would be an oligopoly

pwned ya both

double pwned
a monopoly can be a group which force or set a price to either stay/rise or fall, its just another name for trying to control

a monopoly doesn't need to be one person, it can be a group as long as the group it speaking with 1 voice and setting 1 price and are the only ones offering the goods in demand. In an oligopoly there are several (but very few) groups (or individuals) offering the goods that are in high demand... independently...
triple pwned?

stipoly, is an idea, group,/fact, which i make up & it applies to anything I want it too,
& i never Googled it
so pwned u

ROFL I herewith officially declare S T I the winner of our smartass pwnage duel

That was a fine Duel, we shall cross swords again I think,

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 7:49 am
by geisha
anytime

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:17 am
by ~Artanis~
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:22 am
by geisha
hey hey this was a duel... stay out of it

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:57 am
by Phoenix of Terra
Add a poll for people to vote.
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 12:08 pm
by Bluefox21
S T I wrote:geisha wrote:S T I wrote:geisha wrote:S T I wrote:geisha wrote:S T I wrote:Bluefox21 wrote:I am gonna report ye all to the anti competition board ( dammit im doing my business exam in three weeks and I cant think of the word when a certain number of ppl set a price

) lolI have no prob with ppl refusing to pay over a certain limit but I think massing ppl who charge the high prices is a bit extreme sale and demand theory if someone wants to pay 25 bill per k why not let them. Think if you mass it does kinda slip into the extortion bracket (just offering my opinion)

monopoly

wrong, a monopoly would be when there's only 1 person offering turns and setting the prices.... since there's a few doing it it would be an oligopoly

pwned ya both

double pwned
a monopoly can be a group which force or set a price to either stay/rise or fall, its just another name for trying to control

a monopoly doesn't need to be one person, it can be a group as long as the group it speaking with 1 voice and setting 1 price and are the only ones offering the goods in demand. In an oligopoly there are several (but very few) groups (or individuals) offering the goods that are in high demand... independently...
triple pwned?

stipoly, is an idea, group,/fact, which i make up & it applies to anything I want it too,
& i never Googled it
so pwned u

ROFL I herewith officially declare S T I the winner of our smartass pwnage duel

That was a fine Duel, we shall cross swords again I think,

LOl I was thinking of a "price fixing cartel" but I suppose monopoly could do for a pass student

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 12:13 pm
by Raven
Poll added lets all vote

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 12:22 pm
by Cole
I think my vote is pretty obvious
It's NO
