Page 5 of 5
Re: Spaming the GC?
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:33 am
by hidden
Lucky Starr wrote:Jack wrote:Neither of you have any idea what you're talking about, thus your opinion is invalid on the subject.
Way to go... you should join a debate team, if you're not in one already
this ignore thing isn't going to work very well if people keep quoting him
Re: Spaming the GC?
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:50 am
by Zeratul
hmm... you have a point there... but it was you that ignored him, not us others...
Re: Spaming the GC?
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:10 am
by hidden
Zeratul wrote:hmm... you have a point there... but it was you that ignored him, not us others...
true
but you realize his posts are goading me and the second i make the reply i wanted to I'd probably get suspended
wasn't there a rule against posting with the intention of making someone else break a rule?
also where are the rules?
Re: Spaming the GC?
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:51 am
by Zeratul
new rules are under construction... we will try to figure out how far along in production they are...
Re: Spaming the GC?
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 9:24 am
by hidden
Zeratul wrote:new rules are under construction... we will try to figure out how far along in production they are...
thx
Re: Spaming the GC?
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:25 am
by Solus
@jack: i dont think we should worry much about these guys... theres probably a good majority of spammers that think along our lines.
Re: Spaming the GC?
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:36 pm
by hidden
.:SOULLESS:. wrote:@jack: i dont think we should worry much about these guys... theres probably a good majority of spammers that think along our lines.
what about future spammers? ex spammers? and so on