StarGateWars Forums

Norbe wrote:High Empty.. that was a big MS. WAS.

~Norbe~

Norbe! Leave my tiny MS alone

Cheers for the defenses ETL, HE and LewTenAnt. Always a pleasure.

All defenses off PPT in OE are once again 0...kudos to whoever got that high ranked Titans guy!

Heya Mc-Nooby

15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 7,471,372 0 4,823,659,975,000 8,531,100,214 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 8,756,426 0 4,434,168,775,000 4,662,485,041 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 10,297,991 0 2,218,937,575,000 9,102,589,511 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 12,152,995 0 4,969,719,175,000 5,132,384,153 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 14,391,808 0 4,482,855,175,000 10,526,690,994 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 17,101,499 0 2,340,653,575,000 10,142,543,047 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 20,389,915 0 4,385,482,375,000 11,009,874,927 details
15:01 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 24,390,774 0 4,434,168,775,000 10,939,533,175 details
15:01 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 29,270,001 0 4,726,287,175,000 11,039,564,828 details

reborn had the right idea

~Dä Vinci~ wrote:Heya Mc-Nooby

15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 7,471,372 0 4,823,659,975,000 8,531,100,214 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 8,756,426 0 4,434,168,775,000 4,662,485,041 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 10,297,991 0 2,218,937,575,000 9,102,589,511 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 12,152,995 0 4,969,719,175,000 5,132,384,153 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 14,391,808 0 4,482,855,175,000 10,526,690,994 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 17,101,499 0 2,340,653,575,000 10,142,543,047 details
15:02 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 20,389,915 0 4,385,482,375,000 11,009,874,927 details
15:01 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 24,390,774 0 4,434,168,775,000 10,939,533,175 details
15:01 mcdeadly Attack defended 15 29,270,001 0 4,726,287,175,000 11,039,564,828 details

reborn had the right idea

someone posted similar logs in dde chat last night, seems you're not the only one

Was just looking back in my logs from he massing me with his 18t strike and ms,i had 45t defence,heres what i was up against.

details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 173,649 1,194,739 51,241,381,514,500 38,853,517,280,800 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 157,693 1,379,449 47,689,774,669,400 41,071,181,130,100 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 173,784 1,313,874 50,303,494,625,200 40,631,516,307,600 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 170,153 1,407,337 48,802,355,943,800 41,541,170,709,200 details

now yes my ms was out as it had been hit earlyer but this games just fked up the numbers there are massive it realy does put you off playing,yup having a winge but i felt it needed saying im sure some agree and some dont.

dgb wrote:Was just looking back in my logs from he massing me with his 18t strike and ms,i had 45t defence,heres what i was up against.

details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 173,649 1,194,739 51,241,381,514,500 38,853,517,280,800 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 157,693 1,379,449 47,689,774,669,400 41,071,181,130,100 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 173,784 1,313,874 50,303,494,625,200 40,631,516,307,600 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 170,153 1,407,337 48,802,355,943,800 41,541,170,709,200 details

now yes my ms was out as it had been hit earlyer but this games just fked up the numbers there are massive it realy does put you off playing,yup having a winge but i felt it needed saying im sure some agree and some dont.

((dgb))

Mental wrote:

dgb wrote:Was just looking back in my logs from he massing me with his 18t strike and ms,i had 45t defence,heres what i was up against.

details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 173,649 1,194,739 51,241,381,514,500 38,853,517,280,800 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 157,693 1,379,449 47,689,774,669,400 41,071,181,130,100 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 173,784 1,313,874 50,303,494,625,200 40,631,516,307,600 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 170,153 1,407,337 48,802,355,943,800 41,541,170,709,200 details

now yes my ms was out as it had been hit earlyer but this games just fked up the numbers there are massive it realy does put you off playing,yup having a winge but i felt it needed saying im sure some agree and some dont.

((dgb))

Its mental right

dgb wrote:

Mental wrote:

dgb wrote:Was just looking back in my logs from he massing me with his 18t strike and ms,i had 45t defence,heres what i was up against.

details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 173,649 1,194,739 51,241,381,514,500 38,853,517,280,800 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 157,693 1,379,449 47,689,774,669,400 41,071,181,130,100 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 173,784 1,313,874 50,303,494,625,200 40,631,516,307,600 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 170,153 1,407,337 48,802,355,943,800 41,541,170,709,200 details

now yes my ms was out as it had been hit earlyer but this games just fked up the numbers there are massive it realy does put you off playing,yup having a winge but i felt it needed saying im sure some agree and some dont.

((dgb))

Its mental right

Sometimes it makes me cross too. Then I sit down and think of how much money he has spent.

Then I know I'm the real winner and it's ok again

Field Marshall wrote:

dgb wrote:

Mental wrote:

dgb wrote:Was just looking back in my logs from he massing me with his 18t strike and ms,i had 45t defence,heres what i was up against.

details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 173,649 1,194,739 51,241,381,514,500 38,853,517,280,800 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 157,693 1,379,449 47,689,774,669,400 41,071,181,130,100 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 173,784 1,313,874 50,303,494,625,200 40,631,516,307,600 details
Jul 25, 11:28 High Empty Attack defended 15 170,153 1,407,337 48,802,355,943,800 41,541,170,709,200 details

now yes my ms was out as it had been hit earlyer but this games just fked up the numbers there are massive it realy does put you off playing,yup having a winge but i felt it needed saying im sure some agree and some dont.

((dgb))

Its mental right

Sometimes it makes me cross too. Then I sit down and think of how much money he has spent.

Then I know I'm the real winner and it's ok again

+1

One man's mountain is another man's molehill.

If you don't like the current planet meta, then head on over to the Suggestions forum and come up with some alternatives for discussion. I have heard a few different things mentioned on skype, ranging from another reduction in planet effects to the creation of a no planet bonus house.

Clockwork wrote:One man's mountain is another man's molehill.

If you don't like the current planet meta, then head on over to the Suggestions forum and come up with some alternatives for discussion. I have heard a few different things mentioned on skype, ranging from another reduction in planet effects to the creation of a no planet bonus house.

You callin' HE a giant mole?

Clockwork wrote:One man's mountain is another man's molehill.

If you don't like the current planet meta, then head on over to the Suggestions forum and come up with some alternatives for discussion. I have heard a few different things mentioned on skype, ranging from another reduction in planet effects to the creation of a no planet bonus house.

Actually we did. It was voted on. The vast majority wanted to see a change in planet stats, but nothing was done about it.

Mathlord wrote:

Clockwork wrote:One man's mountain is another man's molehill.

If you don't like the current planet meta, then head on over to the Suggestions forum and come up with some alternatives for discussion. I have heard a few different things mentioned on skype, ranging from another reduction in planet effects to the creation of a no planet bonus house.

Actually we did. It was voted on. The vast majority wanted to see a change in planet stats, but nothing was done about it.

Your probably talking about this thread, and I agree a fair number of people voted for 'some change', but it is/was a close call between 'No chance' and the 'most popular' change.

I don't know if anything is 'going to change' or not, but the less people talk about it, the less likely anything will change. You have nothing to lose from bumping that thread, or adding more discussion, other than the time it takes doing it.