Page 6 of 7

Re: political debate.

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:05 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Jack wrote:I find it funny how the first part of the first link is about pot, and I just woke up from a dream in which my brother was smoking in my room which my sister sent him.


The linked videos are dripping in ignorance, and your addressing them as fact, and irrefutable proof of anything outside of the fact that there are idiots everywhere, is appalling. It only serves to take what little credibility you have left after this charade(every post prior to this last one), and throws it out the window.


jack, i was referring to the article i posted about the empire state building having been hit by a plane. without going back 2 pages and checking i believe corran was trying to say that no building had ever been hit by a plane till now so no one has a frame of reference with concern to the twin towers collapse, which i proved was incorrect and provided the proof.

what have you guys provided, skepticism...at best!

being a skeptic is all well and i good, i have NO problem with that what so ever, all i ask is that while you continue being a skeptic you can at least try and make the effort to see if there is even the smallest amount of truth or evidence to what we talk about.
don't be fooled into thinking ignorance is bliss because that bubble will burst in the next few years.

you guys need more convincing, here listen to an EX-FBI director, and feel free to google his name.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HasXFpgl4jo

Re: political debate.

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:42 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Jack wrote:
[KMA]Avenger wrote:
Jack wrote:I find it funny how the first part of the first link is about pot, and I just woke up from a dream in which my brother was smoking in my room which my sister sent him.


The linked videos are dripping in ignorance, and your addressing them as fact, and irrefutable proof of anything outside of the fact that there are idiots everywhere, is appalling. It only serves to take what little credibility you have left after this charade(every post prior to this last one), and throws it out the window.


jack, i was referring to the article i posted about the empire state building having been hit by a plane. without going back 2 pages and checking i believe corran was trying to say that no building had ever been hit by a plane till now so no one has a frame of reference with concern to the twin towers collapse, which i proved was incorrect and provided the proof.

None of that has anything to do with religion! And the Empire State Building was hit(accidentally) by a B-52 Mitchell Bomber during WWII July 28th, 1945 to be exact.


i beleive i already said that mate :wink:

[KMA]Avenger wrote:1st) could a plane bring down a building? i dont think so...

"Elevator World
3/01/96
July 28, 1945 - Plane Hits Building - Woman Survives 75-Story Fall
By William Roberts

NEW YORK Lost amid the hoopla surrounding the celebrations of the end of World War II has been the 50th anniversary of the army plane crash into the Empire State Building. Many do not know of the tragic incident of July 28, 1945 -- the day a B-25 bomber, lost in fog, rammed into what was then the world's tallest building. Fewer, still, remember the miraculous survival of the woman who fell 75 stories when the cables to her elevator were severed.

Lieutenant Colonel William F. Smith, Jr., a decorated veteran of 100 combat missions, was piloting the bomber from his home in Bedford, Massachusetts to Newark, New Jersey to pick up his commanding officer, before returning to home base in South Dakota. The flight plan called for Smith to land at LaGuardia Airport. A dense fog over the city led the air traffic controller to direct that a landing be made. Smith, however, apparently believing he could maneuver safely through the fog, asked and received permission to fly on to Newark -- on the other side of Manhattan from LaGuardia. The last thing the air traffic controller told Smith was, 'At the present time, I can't see the top of the Empire State Building.'

The War Department, now a section of the Defense Department, later determined the pilot erred in judgment when electing to fly over Manhattan in the weather conditions which prevailed at the time' -- Smith should never have been cleared to proceed on to Newark. Disoriented by the dense fog, he apparently believed he was on Manhattan's west side.

Smith's final blunder came when he passed the Chrysler Building. Had he kicked the left rudder, he would have been safe; instead, he went right rudder and directly on a path to the Empire State Building. At 200 miles per hour, the unarmed trainer bomber screamed down 42nd Street and banked south over 5th Avenue. The pilot tried desperately to climb, but it was too late. At 9:40 that Saturday morning, the B-25 slammed into the 79th floor of the Empire State Building.

Luckily, the accident occurred on a weekend, with only about 1,500 people in the building -- compared with the 10,000-15,000 on an average weekday. Still, 14 died in the accident -- 11 in the building, plus Colonel Smith and the other two occupants of the plane. Hardest hit was the Catholic War Relief Office on the 79th floor, directly in the path of the bomber. Eight relief office workers were killed.

Extensive Damage Reported

Damage to the building and the surrounding area was extensive. An 18-by-20 foot hole was gouged by the B-25, and one of the plane's engines plowed through the building, emerging on the 33rd Street side and crashing through the roof of a neighboring building. Upon impact, windows shattered, and glass fell to the street. When the bomber hit, its fuel tanks exploded, sending flames racing across the 79th floor in all directions. According to Althea S. Lethbridge, a secretary for a trading company on the 72nd floor, 'Everything shook. (At the window), we saw flames below and above us. It was scary; we didn't know how fireproof the building was.'

Lethbridge and those not severely injured had to walk 70 flights down the darkened stairwell. Many reported seeing flaming debris fall down the elevator shafts. Unaware that the plane's other engine and part of its landing gear had fallen through the elevator shaft, rescue workers used elevators to transport casualties.

Unbeknownst to rescuers, when the hoist and governor cables of one of the elevators had been severed, ropes to other cars had been weakened. Nevertheless, the elevators had to be used to transport those severely injured, including Betty Lou Oliver. As the plane hit, Oliver, an elevator operator, was blown out of her post on the 80th floor and badly burned. After receiving first aid, she was put in another car to go down to an ambulance. As the elevator doors closed, rescue workers heard what sounded like a gunshot but what was, in fact, the snapping of elevator cables weakened by the crash. The car with Oliver inside, now at the 75th floor, plunged to the sub-basement, a fall of over 1,000 feet. Rescuers had to cut a hole in the car to get to the badly injured elevator operator.

Despite a harrowing experience, Oliver survived, due in large part to the elevator safety devices which served their function, though perhaps not as envisioned. The elevator car safety could not set because the governor cable had been severed by the plane's impact. Therefore, other factors contributed to slowing the elevator and 'cushioning' its fall. As the elevator fell, the compensating cables, hanging from beneath the car, piled up in the pit and acted as a coiled spring, slowing the elevator. Also, the hatchway was of a 'high-pressure' design, with minimum clearance around the car. In such a small space, the air was compressed under the falling elevator. With such a tight fit of the car in the hatchway, the trapped air created an air cushion in the lower portion of the shaft -- thereby further slowing the elevator car and allowing its occupant to survive.

Though this accident can certainly be noted as a tragedy, some comfort can be found; the loss of life was certainly not as great as it could have been. Had it occurred on a weekday, the accident would have claimed many more casualties. If the plane had been a fully armed B-25 bomber instead of a trainer, the destruction and devastation could have been catastrophic. In addition, had the elevator been installed improperly or had its safety devices been of poor quality -- even though they may not have worked exactly as envisioned, they still performed their duty by saving a human life -- Ms. Oliver could not have fallen 1,000 feet in an elevator and lived to tell about it. "



and whose talking about religion?

i only posted the links about the christian nuts as a side note, joke even.

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:45 am
by [KMA]Avenger
on another side not, politicians are lying before their even in office, so why do we tolerate all their crap...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHVEDq6RVXc

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:05 am
by [KMA]Avenger
funny as hell and pretty much sums up the most (supposedly) powerful man on the planet...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J5W_OFCdsk

whoever made that film should make a sequel :lol: :lol:

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:12 am
by [KMA]Avenger
i would like to ask all Americans how they would feel if i was to ask to blow my nose on the US constitution and just how long my face would stay intact if i was to make such a request on US soil??

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:02 pm
by Iƒrit
Part 1 - http://youtube.com/watch?v=Pme20JHPkwk&feature=related
Part 2 - http://youtube.com/watch?v=7Y4j4m90-XM
Part 3 - http://youtube.com/watch?v=oNjnvp5z6kM
Part 4 - http://youtube.com/watch?v=FGrlZTlD-Sc
Part 5 - http://youtube.com/watch?v=lF_92PpCyUs
Part 6 - http://youtube.com/watch?v=lnm1nPHdATQ
Part 7 - http://youtube.com/watch?v=DD1qMXMOjfo
Part 8 - http://youtube.com/watch?v=Kze69_lmGmA

Its to bad he doesnt realize the truth about 9/11, but besides that this man Has some of the greatest ideas for america. I've been talking with him a bit and trying to convience him to return to his campaign as presidentcy. If I was to vote at all this would be the guy for me, and Im not even republican. It would also be the first time I have ever voted for a president (please dont beat me for that statement). Anyway, this guy has the idea of what our founding fathers wanted and he knows that is what america was intended to be. And I just love what he says about Obama, cause most people dont understand obama's postion on war, nor his foreign policy.

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:47 pm
by [KMA]Avenger
[KMA]Avenger wrote:i would like to ask all Americans how they would feel if i was to ask to blow my nose on the US constitution and just how long my face would stay intact if i was to make such a request on US soil??





i'm going to assume that i cannot use the constitution of the USA as a snot rag and if i was to attempt to do so i would be shot dead and my lifeless body beaten daily for all time...

if i cant have my way with the constitution why can Bush?...




"Bush on the Constitution: A 'goddamned piece of paper'
By DOUG THOMPSON
Dec 5, 2005, 07:53


Last month, Republican Congressional leaders filed into the Oval Office to meet with President George W. Bush and talk about renewing the controversial USA Patriot Act.

Several provisions of the act, passed in the shell shocked period immediately following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, caused enough anger that liberal groups like the American Civil Liberties Union had joined forces with prominent conservatives like Phyllis Schlafly and Bob Barr to oppose renewal.

GOP leaders told Bush that his hardcore push to renew the more onerous provisions of the act could further alienate conservatives still mad at the President from his botched attempt to nominate White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.

"I don't give a goddamn," Bush retorted. "I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way."

"Mr. President," one aide in the meeting said. "There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution."

"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's just a goddamned piece of paper!"

This information comes from three West Wing sources who say a fourth White House employee in the meeting told them the President of the United States called the Constitution "a goddamned piece of paper." That employee refused to return my phone calls but this kind of behavior is consistent with Bush's record on ignoring the Constitution when it suits his political purpose.

To the Bush Administration, the Constitution of the United States is little more than toilet paper stained from all the **Filtered** that this group of power-mad despots have dumped on the freedoms that "goddamned piece of paper" used to guarantee.

Put aside, for a moment, political affiliation or personal beliefs. It doesn't matter if you are a Democratic, Republican or Independent. It doesn't matter if you support the invasion or Iraq or not. Despite our differences, the Constitution has stood for two centuries as the defining document of our government, the final source to determine - in the end - if something is legal or right.

Every federal official - including the President - who takes an oath of office swears to "uphold and defend" the Constitution of the United States.

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says he cringes when someone calls the Constitution a "living document."

""Oh, how I hate the phrase we have-a 'living document,'" Scalia says. "We now have a Constitution that means whatever we want it to mean. The Constitution is not a living organism, for Pete's sake."

As a judge, Scalia says, "I don't have to prove that it's perfect; I just have to prove that it's better than anything else."

President Bush has proposed seven amendments to the Constitution over the last five years - a record for any modern President, including a controversial amendment to define marriage as a "union between a man and woman." Members of Congress have proposed some 11,000 amendments over the last decade, ranging from repeal of the right to bear arms to a Constitutional ban on abortion.

Scalia says the danger of tinkering with the Constitution comes from a loss of rights.

"We can take away rights just as we can grant new ones," Scalia warns. "Don't think that it's a one-way street."

And don't buy the White House hype that the USA Patriot Act is a necessary tool to fight terrorism. It is a dangerous law that infringes on the rights of every American citizen and, as one brave aide told President Bush, something that undermines the Constitution of the United States.

But why should Bush care? After all, the Constitution is just "a goddamned piece of paper."






if i was an American i would demand Bush's head on a pike for such an outburst. but its ok, really it is...i mean, if the armed forces don't have to keep the oath they took why should the commander in chief...correct?

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 12:47 am
by [KMA]Avenger
be afraid, be VERY VERY afraid...




NSPD-51: Bush prepares martial law
Submitted by Bill Weinberg on Thu, 05/24/2007 - 18:01.

Every president since FDR has drawn up such plans. The most notorious were Nixon's "Operation Garden Plot" and Reagan's "REX 84 Alpha"—a legacy we recalled when the Homeland Security Act passed in 2002. This latest incarnation has gone unnoticed by the New York Times and other major media. Leave it to the editorial page of Tennessee's Chattanoogan, May 24:

Bush Makes Power Grab
President Bush, without so much as issuing a press statement, on May 9 signed a directive that granted near dictatorial powers to the office of the president in the event of a national emergency declared by the president.

The "National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive," with the dual designation of NSPD-51, as a National Security Presidential Directive, and HSPD-20, as a Homeland Security Presidential Directive, establishes under the office of president a new National Continuity Coordinator.

That job, as the document describes, is to make plans for "National Essential Functions" of all federal, state, local, territorial, and tribal governments, as well as private sector organizations to continue functioning under the president's directives in the event of a national emergency.

The directive loosely defines "catastrophic emergency" as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions."

When the President determines a catastrophic emergency has occurred, the President can take over all government functions and direct all private sector activities to ensure we will emerge from the emergency with an "enduring constitutional government."

Translated into layman's terms, when the President determines a national emergency has occurred, the President can declare to the office of the presidency powers usually assumed by dictators to direct any and all government and business activities until the emergency is declared over.

Ironically, the directive sees no contradiction in the assumption of dictatorial powers by the President with the goal of maintaining constitutional continuity through an emergency.

The directive specifies that the assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism will be designated as the National Continuity Coordinator. Further established is a Continuity Policy Coordination Committee, chaired by a senior director from the Homeland Security Council staff, designated by the National Continuity Coordinator, to be "the main day-to-day forum for such policy coordination."

Currently, the assistant to the president for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism is Frances Fragos Townsend. Townsend spent 13 years at the Justice Department before moving to the U.S. Coast Guard where she served as assistant commandant for intelligence. She is a White House staff member in the executive office of the president who also chairs the Homeland Security Council, which as a counterpart to the National Security Council reports directly to the president.

The directive issued May 9 makes no attempt to reconcile the powers created there for the National Continuity Coordinator with the National Emergency Act. As specified by U.S. Code Title 50, Chapter 34, Subchapter II, Section 1621, the National Emergency Act allows that the president may declare a national emergency but requires that such proclamation "shall immediately be transmitted to the Congress and published in the Federal Register."

A Congressional Research Service study notes that under the National Emergency Act, the President "may seize property, organize and control the means of production, seize commodities, assign military forces abroad, institute martial law, seize and control all transportation and communication, regulate the operation of private enterprise, restrict travel, and, in a variety of ways, control the lives of United States citizens."

The CRS study notes that the National Emergency Act sets up congress as a balance empowered to "modify, rescind, or render dormant such delegated emergency authority," if Congress believes the president has acted inappropriately.

NSPD-51/ HSPD-20 appears to supersede the National Emergency Act by creating the new position of National Continuity Coordinator without any specific act of Congress authorizing the position.

NSPD-51/ HSPD-20 also makes no reference whatsoever to Congress. The language of the May 9 directive appears to negate any a requirement that the President submit to Congress a determination that a national emergency exists, suggesting instead that the powers of the executive order can be implemented without any congressional approval or oversight.

Homeland Security spokesperson Russ Knocke affirmed that the Homeland Security Department will be implementing the requirements of NSPD-51/HSPD-20 under Townsend's direction.

The White House had no comment.

While we're skeptical Bush will have the cojones to pull this off, NSPD-51 is particularly ominous in light of the draconian provisions of the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act.

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:05 am
by weilandsmith
You may be right. Bush may be diabolical. Even so, he doesn't have enough time to make a power grab unless he secretly triggers an operation that will cause mass death and destruction in the US right before elections happen.

Still, there really is no proof. He says, she says doesn't work as proof. The courts of justice, in proving innocence or guilt, will not accept eye witness testimony unless it is backed by forensic or factual proof. He says, she says is not factual.

But you are right about most Central Banks and the Federal Reserve as being private institutions. The Federal Reserve was an idea in the early 20th century that was bitterly opposed by FDR. Eventually, the Federal Reserve won out with the support of JP Morgan and the Chase Manhattan Bank of the Rockefellers.

The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank are also ideas from the the JP Morgan-Rockefeller group. Point in fact, the land on which the United Nations HQ sits on belonged to the Rockefellers before they donated it to the UN. Both Morgan and Rockefeller have partner banks in the UK. I forget the name.

Anyway, the hand of international banking is clearly visible in shaping international policy.

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:17 am
by Iƒrit
weilandsmith wrote:You may be right. Bush may be diabolical. Even so, he doesn't have enough time to make a power grab unless he secretly triggers an operation that will cause mass death and destruction in the US right before elections happen.

Still, there really is no proof. He says, she says doesn't work as proof. The courts of justice, in proving innocence or guilt, will not accept eye witness testimony unless it is backed by forensic or factual proof. He says, she says is not factual.

But you are right about most Central Banks and the Federal Reserve as being private institutions. The Federal Reserve was an idea in the early 20th century that was bitterly opposed by FDR. Eventually, the Federal Reserve won out with the support of JP Morgan and the Chase Manhattan Bank of the Rockefellers.

The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank are also ideas from the the JP Morgan-Rockefeller group. Point in fact, the land on which the United Nations HQ sits on belonged to the Rockefellers before they donated it to the UN. Both Morgan and Rockefeller have partner banks in the UK. I forget the name.

Anyway, the hand of international banking is clearly visible in shaping international policy.
thjere is a such thing as Guilty Demeanor in the courts

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:37 am
by [KMA]Avenger
i think everyone has missed the point here...

while bush and his band of gangsterbanksters and corporate cronies grant themselves FAT contracts at the tax payers expense under the Guise of homeland security and terrorist threats/attacks they are tightening security at the expense of your freedoms, liberty's and your constitution which guarantees those basic human rights.
they are putting into place the means to remove ALL your freedoms (just as hitler did) and when the next attack comes you will be powerless to do anything to stop whoever is wielding those powers.

the US is spending trillions of dollars (much of which cannot be accounted for and the american public has no legal right to audit...WTH???) on wars and defense and yet any moron with an announce of bomb making knowhow (or an internet connection) can attack America this very minute...or is hijacking a plane and crashing it into an iconic structure the only way to attack America?

when the next attack comes (trust what i say is true here) martial law will be declared and bush (or whoever is prez) will assume dictatorial powers and suspend the US constitution (temporarily of course) under the guise of security and you will lose ALL communication with the outside world. they will cut phone lines, cell phone and internet access and all channels on the TV bar 1 which will be your only source of knowledge...wait and see.


quoting Benjamin Franklin...

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

i wonder what Ben Franklin would think of his people now. if i was American i would feel shame that i am part of the destruction of a dream to be free....hell, i feel shame to call myself a human being when i look at the state of world affairs.

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:18 am
by [KMA]Avenger
the reason why most of you cannot comprehend what we say to you as being true is because you have been conditioned to accept the status quo but when the status quo changes what happens? you scream for justice and whether it comes or not is besides the point because after a time you go back to being comfortable in your status quo and the tiny and ever shrinking world you live in, like the moth to the flame you get suckered in time and time again and each time you return to your box its that much smaller....

MY GOD PEOPLE, 3K MEN WOMAN AND CHILDREN HAVE LOST THEIR LIVES,TO SAY NOTHING OF THE COUNTLESS MILLIONS THAT HAVE BEEN KILLED, NAY....HAVE BEEN MURDERED SINCE 9/11. BUSH OR BIN LADEN, SADDAM OR AL QAEDA IS IRRELEVANT, WHAT IS RELEVANT IS THE COMPLETE AND UTTER MISMANAGEMENT OF THE BRITISH AND AMERICAN GOVERNMENTS AND THE ARM FORCES OF OUR RESPECTIVE COUNTIES. THAT IN ITSELF DEMANDS JUSTICE AND ACTION TO BRING THOSE RESPONSIBLE TO JUSTICE, SO THE QUESTION BECOMES, WILL YOU OR WILL YOU NOT DO SOMETHING ABOUT ALL THIS?????

some more food for thought about how you are conditioned to just say "what can i do about it?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBBMjbaFl4E


the state of world affairs contrary to what you have been taught is not "how its always been" it is what they want you to belive, remove the vails and stand up, left and right doesn't matter, what matters is you stand as 1 for a better world.

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:23 am
by Iƒrit
[KMA]Avenger wrote:the reason why most of you cannot comprehend what we say to you as being true is because you have been conditioned to accept the status quo but when the status quo changes what happens? you scream for justice and whether it comes or not is besides the point because after a time you go back to being comfortable in your status quo and the tiny and ever shrinking world you live in, like the moth to the flame you get suckered in time and time again and each time you return to your box its that much smaller....

MY GOD PEOPLE, 3K MEN WOMAN AND CHILDREN HAVE LOST THEIR LIVES,TO SAY NOTHING OF THE COUNTLESS MILLIONS THAT HAVE BEEN KILLED, NAY....HAVE BEEN MURDERED SINCE 9/11. BUSH OR BIN LADEN, SADDAM OR AL QAEDA IS IRRELEVANT, WHAT IS RELEVANT IS THE COMPLETE AND UTTER MISMANAGEMENT OF THE BRITISH AND AMERICAN GOVERNMENTS AND THE ARM FORCES OF OUR RESPECTIVE COUNTIES. THAT IN ITSELF DEMANDS JUSTICE AND ACTION TO BRING THOSE RESPONSIBLE TO JUSTICE, SO THE QUESTION BECOMES, WILL YOU OR WILL YOU NOT DO SOMETHING ABOUT ALL THIS?????

some more food for thought about how you are conditioned to just say "what can i do about it?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBBMjbaFl4E

acually the death toll is over 4k...just figured Id add that...oh and thats americans....

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:29 am
by [KMA]Avenger
well the death toll is higher than 4k when you take into account that 9/11, 7/7, Madrid, Bali and the other so called terrorist attacks where all committed by the same group.

9/11 is the one that stands out and the rest are just to scare people into thinking its terrorists.

truth be told, our leaders are not our countrymen, they DO NOT swear allegiance to any flag and when you understand this you then begin to understand why the english speaking country's bend over backwards to flood the streets with non-english speaking peoples and why solidarity amongst the indigenous population is crumbling so fast.

Re: educating the masses and waking up the sheople.

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:30 am
by Iƒrit
[KMA]Avenger wrote:well the death toll is higher than 4k when you take into account that 9/11, 7/7, Madrid, Bali and the other so called terrorist attacks where all committed by the same group.

9/11 is the one that stands out and the rest are just to scare people into thinking its terrorists.

truth be told, our leaders are not our countrymen, they DO NOT swear allegiance to any flag and when you understand this you then begin to understand why the english speaking country's bend over backwards top flood the streets with non-english speaking country's and why solidarity amongst the indigenous population is crumbling so fast.

I agree mate, 100%.
I was hwever refering to deaths in the middle east but your totally correct to add 9/11 and others.