Page 6 of 8

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:22 pm
by Juliette
Can someone calculate mine? :oops: I do not get the maths here. :|
Mining Drone(Lifers) 64,167,113 (40,749,723)
Maximum Safe Capacity for Empire Stronghold 7,707,382,262,840
Thanks in advance to anyone who helps me on this one.
Don't feel obliged whatsoever. ;)

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:33 pm
by Cole
Lois Lane wrote:Can someone calculate mine? :oops: I do not get the maths here. :|
Mining Drone(Lifers) 64,167,113 (40,749,723)
Maximum Safe Capacity for Empire Stronghold 7,707,382,262,840
Thanks in advance to anyone who helps me on this one.
Don't feel obliged whatsoever. ;)

It is 120.114 :)

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:51 pm
by Clarkey
Is it that hard to divide one number by another? :roll:

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:23 am
by Cole
clarkey wrote:Is it that hard to divide one number by another? :roll:

That's not the question! :?
It's just a matter of knowing which ones have to be divided, and what has to be done with found result, to find final one.

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:25 am
by Clarkey
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:Is it that hard to divide one number by another? :roll:

That's not the question! :?
It's just a matter of knowing which ones have to be divided, and what has to be done with found result, to find final one.

Stronghold divided by miners, nothing has to be done with found result to find final one?

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:31 am
by Cole
clarkey wrote:
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:Is it that hard to divide one number by another? :roll:

That's not the question! :?
It's just a matter of knowing which ones have to be divided, and what has to be done with found result, to find final one.

Stronghold divided by miners, nothing has to be done with found result to find final one?

Oh yes it needs...divide 7.7tril by 64mil HIGHLY doubtful you'll find ~120.114 but more likely ~120114. :)

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:41 am
by Clarkey
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:Is it that hard to divide one number by another? :roll:

That's not the question! :?
It's just a matter of knowing which ones have to be divided, and what has to be done with found result, to find final one.

Stronghold divided by miners, nothing has to be done with found result to find final one?

Oh yes it needs...divide 7.7tril by 64mil HIGHLY doubtful you'll find ~120.114 but more likely ~120114. :)

LOL only a n00b wouldn't know 120114 would be 120,114.

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:53 am
by Juliette
Someone who is not used to using the separation mark is not necessarily a n00b.
Uninformed, perhaps, but not a n00b.

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:00 am
by cloak
Mining Drone(Lifers) 36,962,310 (23,068,059)
Maximum Safe Capacity for Empire Stronghold
6,950,923,673,510

So: 180,054

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:05 am
by Cole
clarkey wrote:
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:Is it that hard to divide one number by another? :roll:

That's not the question! :?
It's just a matter of knowing which ones have to be divided, and what has to be done with found result, to find final one.

Stronghold divided by miners, nothing has to be done with found result to find final one?

Oh yes it needs...divide 7.7tril by 64mil HIGHLY doubtful you'll find ~120.114 but more likely ~120114. :)

LOL only a n00b wouldn't know 120114 would be 120,114.

I said 120 . 114 not 120 , 114..

In english, 120 . 114 is the same that 120 , 114 is for many other countries.
120 , 114 in english is equivalent to 120 . 114.

Here, we talked about 120 . 114 in english, as we divided 120 , 114 in english by 1000 to find it. We didn't say 120 , 114. So NO IDEA where's the problem??

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:07 am
by Clarkey
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:Is it that hard to divide one number by another? :roll:

That's not the question! :?
It's just a matter of knowing which ones have to be divided, and what has to be done with found result, to find final one.

Stronghold divided by miners, nothing has to be done with found result to find final one?

Oh yes it needs...divide 7.7tril by 64mil HIGHLY doubtful you'll find ~120.114 but more likely ~120114. :)

LOL only a n00b wouldn't know 120114 would be 120,114.

I said 120 . 114 not 120 , 114..

In english, 120 . 114 is the same that 120 , 114 is for many other countries.
120 , 114 in english is equivalent to 120 . 114.

Here, we talked about 120 . 114 in english, as we divided 120 , 114 in english by 1000 to find it. We didn't say 120 , 114. So NO IDEA where's the problem??

All i could see was blah blah blah.
You are the one that created a problem out of nowhere.

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:12 am
by Cole
clarkey wrote:
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:Is it that hard to divide one number by another? :roll:

That's not the question! :?
It's just a matter of knowing which ones have to be divided, and what has to be done with found result, to find final one.

Stronghold divided by miners, nothing has to be done with found result to find final one?

Oh yes it needs...divide 7.7tril by 64mil HIGHLY doubtful you'll find ~120.114 but more likely ~120114. :)

LOL only a n00b wouldn't know 120114 would be 120,114.

I said 120 . 114 not 120 , 114..

In english, 120 . 114 is the same that 120 , 114 is for many other countries.
120 , 114 in english is equivalent to 120 . 114.

Here, we talked about 120 . 114 in english, as we divided 120 , 114 in english by 1000 to find it. We didn't say 120 , 114. So NO IDEA where's the problem??

All i could see was blah blah blah.
You are the one that created a problem out of nowhere.

Yes you see blah blah because you don't even know what I wrote firstly rofl!!! :lol:
The one who said only a noob wouldnt know how to use that, didn't even see I said 120.114 and NOT 120,114 (equal to 120114)...
So you are claiming 120,114 = 120.114?
Riiight! :lol:

And Auriel is right, if you read my previous post you'll see why...because fyi, in english "." and "," are the opposite of what they are in other countries (in maths).
It wasn't blah blah blah AT ALL, it was explanation of "," "." use in different countries, ones using UK/US way, and ones using the "European way".

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:23 am
by Clarkey
This is how I do it.

7,707,382,262,840
divided by
64,167,113
equals
120114.212.....

= 120,114

Why would you then divide it by 1000?

And yes I did see you used 120.114.

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:31 am
by Cole
clarkey wrote:This is how I do it.

7,707,382,262,840
divided by
64,167,113
equals
120114.212.....

= 120,114

Why would you then divide it by 1000?

And yes I did see you used 120.114.

Because that way it eliminates all the crap behind original number's dot, when divided by 1000 as we divide the round number by 1000. But we know it's 120,114. Just that this way, it's a smaller number. And we can multiply it by 1000 again after to avoid confusions :-D
Unless of course we decide to modify directly the result by using calculator's option to disable decimal numbers. That way no need for all of that :)

But then it wouldn't be "=" to but "~" to.

Re: BIGGEST bank to miner ratio (includes lifer miners)

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:36 am
by Clarkey
LegendaryApophis wrote:
clarkey wrote:This is how I do it.

7,707,382,262,840
divided by
64,167,113
equals
120114.212.....

= 120,114

Why would you then divide it by 1000?

And yes I did see you used 120.114.

Because that way it eliminates all the crap behind original number's dot, when divided by 1000 as we divide the round number by 1000. But we know it's 120,114. Just that this way, it's a smaller number. And we can multiply it by 1000 again after to avoid confusions :-D
Unless of course we decide to modify directly the result by using calculator's option to disable decimal numbers. That way no need for all of that :)

But then it wouldn't be "=" to but "~" to.

The thing that confused me was you dividing by 1000 when it isn't needed.

If you get the number 120114.21275630711327156015262834

Then you just wipe everything after the dot and place a comma between 120 and 114 to make 120,114.

There's no need for dividing by 1000 then multiplying by 1000. Talk about complicating a simple calculation.