StarGateWars Forums

pianomutt20000 wrote:Su,


If this takes off, you'll need alliance mates




Like old times?

Bill

Haha perhaps.

LegendaryApophis wrote:

Su wrote:Perhaps for the market we reduce the #'s of ppt's you can have to one per week, or even remove completely unless you pay for it with cash.

Let's be honest, jason will need to have a way to fund this. There will always be people who will try to buy their way to accounts.

I say a big plus to AC. There's a few good updates that we can bring with us of course.

So who wants to give this to jason for his review and answer?

As I said, bonuses with SS/USS.
More bank space, ppt, extra UP/naq.
1x48hrs PPT a week..without SS/USS...well if 2 is too much, why not then.

I understand what your saying now. Sorry I misunderstood you the first time. My mistake.

Yes, I agree, One time Protection per weekf or 48 hours with no exrta goodies unless paid for via a SS or USS.

That's fair.

I def would play like the old way.

any news on when this could happen

I'm not sure this will ... occur like the old people are hoping to. I played way back when, and the only reason it truly made it the way it was was because of the size. The amount of players who are around now are so much more numerous, player etiquette has changed drastically, alliances would still be formed whether they exsisted in game or not.

If it can occur, great, I'm all for it. But I think what made the old times, the good times, were the people who played it. The Old Guard. There are hardly any left from there, though their mannerisms and respect levels are much more notoriously high then the newer genereations.

Just my opinion.

Rugnicon.

Su wrote:I don't mind the MS, but the AC is needed so you don't have people who simply build a bunch of strike and train all units into Covert.

As for old races, yes, old races and no new ones, and no ascended. Good old Race Wars can return

after a little thought, i'd have to agree...what was i thinking?! lol

Cool! No more hesitating for me between SL and Ancients if it's unascended only!

isnt that what quantums for....lol....it resets though.....

Kad

Su wrote:Perhaps for the market we reduce the #'s of ppt's you can have to one per week, or even remove completely unless you pay for it with cash.

Let's be honest, jason will need to have a way to fund this. There will always be people who will try to buy their way to accounts.

I say a big plus to AC. There's a few good updates that we can bring with us of course.

So who wants to give this to jason for his review and answer?

another thing i would back
too many easy ppt's these days

in the old days you had to buy a ppt or vacation your account

Kadaj wrote:isnt that what quantums for....lol....it resets though.....

Kad

No, excepted first rounds and round 11 who were old school, it's full of unique updates that never existed in main.

Rugnicon wrote:I'm not sure this will ... occur like the old people are hoping to. I played way back when, and the only reason it truly made it the way it was was because of the size. The amount of players who are around now are so much more numerous, player etiquette has changed drastically, alliances would still be formed whether they exsisted in game or not.

If it can occur, great, I'm all for it. But I think what made the old times, the good times, were the people who played it. The Old Guard. There are hardly any left from there, though their mannerisms and respect levels are much more notoriously high then the newer genereations.

Just my opinion.

Rugnicon.

Player etiquette changed because changes to the game meant that actions had far less consequence than they did previously, people could do anything they wanted to do without repercussion. This bred arrogance.

I don't think whether alliances exist in-game or not, but would still be formed is even an issue.

Alliances aren't a problem, game mechanics are.
Alliances existed since first month (not tagged ingame but still)

LegendaryApophis wrote:Alliances aren't a problem, game mechanics are.

Amen brother.

I always thought not having ingame alliance tags created a bit if intrigue.. people belonged to more than one alliance and there was a bit more spying as a result.

I can see two sides to alliances. On the side with it, it creates the old family play style again. On the other side, it creates more fights