Kit-Fox wrote:wow with such rebuttals one wonders why you bothered to ask in the first place.
the UK especially was conned into joining the EU. We didnt want to join any political alliance and france etc etc knew this, hence why it was only a trade alliacne to start with (the EEC)
If joining europe is such a great idea why do you need to con people into it?
If I'm reacting like that, it's because the "it was all a conspiracy to trap us into your mastermind plan" is quite boring and false.
And if you knew as you pretend about EU, you would know it was constructed as time passed. There was no set and known goal of EU and euro money plans when Roma treaty was signed. It's not NWO crap planned hundred of years ago or whatever....
V.O.I.D wrote:LegendaryApophis wrote:1.Read again, I said it would be good if yes voters posted as well.
actually pops you clearly said that your opponents in this 'debate' are EXPECTED to post their opinions, whereas people who agree with you are not.
LegendaryApophis wrote:...if you vote no or other kind of EU, you are expected to post as well!...
LegendaryApophis wrote:...if you vote yes, it's up to you...
besides, if this is to be a debate, then why dont you adress the issues Kit-fox has presented with something other than vague sarcasm which really doesnt accomplish anything?
~soul
The power of quotes...you can use them as you wish. And change their meaning. I'm seing you did so.
And yes sarcasm, because he doesn't seem to understand that EU built itself with time, that trapping countries into it with lies & hidden agenda is pure bs and is paranoia.
UK joined in 1973, Maastricht treaty in 1992...
It's just trying to make EU guilty for UK's SO CALLED mistake to have joined EU by pretending false things.
Desert Ghost wrote:LegendaryApophis wrote:Desert Ghost wrote:LegendaryApophis wrote:Universe wrote:Radical Right To Parliament!
There's already enough of them...(there shouldn't be
any >_<)
And also enough of their bs about holocaust being a minor detail in history, like if attempt of extermination of Jews was close to nothing.
HMMMM
Yes?
I'm against radical right (and left...) in office, because only so called progress they can achieve is a disbanding/exploding of EU...
So whoever supports them to be in office are AGAINST EU!! (just listen to far right/left leaders and how they feel about EU!)
And yes I know what I'm talking about, I'm informing myself for EU elections to be sure to know all facts, which I'm tending towards.

And yes what I said comes +/- from French far right leader...who has a sit in European Parliament. It's not lies, it's true.
man, im jewish... lol i know where it can get...
I don't understand why people can say such things as "radical right to parliament" that it will do progress...
Do they even realize that all antisemit groups are either far right or far left? No, they just think far right is ultraliberal-capitalist...
That's where they are wrong. And I'm trying to tell those people here, but they don't want to understand.
They don't understand what enormeous mistake they could do if they voted for a radical party...why would right wing in several countries be hostile to far right? It's not because of their economical views, but for almost all the rest of their program, and more likely what can be read between the lines.
If you are racist/xenophob/antisemit, you will vote for far right. If you are capitalist and economically liberal, you will vote for right wing or those parties I don't agree with (libertarians), depending on your view of things. Am I generalizing? Of course not. I've considered suficiently the question.
That's why it really annoys me when people who aren't racist etc... want to vote for a radical side. They don't understand what their vote means.