StarGateWars Forums

You're so funny.. at one point you say the Church is evil (satanic this and evil child kidnapping that), and at the next you say the morals it upholds are valid (f.x. the random dogma that loans with interest are evil).

By the way, I warned you before to lay off the insulting attitude. If you suggest one more time that I am too stupid to understand and "why can't you just believe!" the fantasies of deluded fiction writers, .. *evil glare*

far be it from me to insult anyone, that's not my intention, and i apologies if you took offence, i assure, none was intended...

the church as far as i'm aware, never started out as a satanic institute, but look at all the pagan symbolism in the modern church, from what i have learned about the church, its been overrun by the Illuminati.

an excellent source of info with regards to the Vatican and The Black Pope, some say he is the most powerful man on earth, and the Jesuits are the most powerful secret order:

http://www.vaticanassassins.org/


i don't know enough about either to comment more at this time.




"You're the one living in a f****** dream, Silberman!"

Sarah conner
Terminator 2

edit:

btw, i love the way you ignore everything except that 1 point hoping to catch me, having in your eyes already slipped up even before i have stepped on the proverbial banana skin, instead of understanding...

that's not to say you don't have the intelligence to understand, it simply means in your words, "you don't care", even though your paying taxes like the rest of us in order to pay back the money our Govts have borrowed after having given control of the money to those we pay taxes to.

Compound interest: 1$ lent with 5% interest.
After 15 years, one owes over 2$.
After 23 years, one owes over 3$.
After 29 years, one owes over 4$.
After 33 years, one owes over 5$.
After 48 years, one owes over 10$.
After 62 years, one owes over 20$.
Atfer 100 years, 131.50$ is owed.

Simple interest: 1$ lent with 5% interest.
After 1 year, 1.05$ are owed.
After 100 years, 6$ are owed.

@no one in particular...

putting ALL the evils and the conspiracy's of the bankers aside, and looking at this from a purely logical point of view, what is more illogical, discontinuing the practice of fraction reserve banking or, continue the practice of borrowing money from privately owned banks?

keeping in mind that the debt can NEVER be repaid for 1 simple and undeniable fact...we gave all the money to the bankers, so we have no money ourselves and must borrow money from those we gave the money to

I don't mind being indebted.
Heck, it takes all the responsibility from me so I can lean back and do only what I am told to do. Good game!

[KMA]Avenger wrote:@no one in particular...

putting ALL the evils and the conspiracy's of the bankers aside, and looking at this from a purely logical point of view, what is more illogical, discontinuing the practice of fraction reserve banking or, continue the practice of borrowing money from privately owned banks?

keeping in mind that the debt can NEVER be repaid for 1 simple and undeniable fact...we gave all the money to the bankers, so we have no money ourselves and must borrow money from those we gave the money to

Keeping money at home well it's endangered by local robbers! Don't forget that hehe

Jim, i never said we should go back to the stone age.

we can have banks, so long as we take back our ability to coin money, we don't have bankers and their fractional reserve banking system, which i might add, is only their to remove the wealth of a nation and place that wealth in the hands of the bankers.

Anyway, Rothschild family still know the manners to respect during meal more than most people on this planet!

Ah.
G, how do you picture we 'take back our ability to coin money'? Do you want to coin money? Or will you trust Joe to coin your money? And if you trust Joe to coin your money, why would Joe not have the same grandiose plans the Rothschilds supposedly had? In other words.. unless you intend to coin the money yourself (which I will not trust you to).. I do not see how your plan would change anything.


Having said that, I think this is becoming one of the most sensible complaints you have lodged against reality so far. (That is a thinly veiled compliment.)

Universe wrote:Ah.
G, how do you picture we 'take back our ability to coin money'? Do you want to coin money? Or will you trust Joe to coin your money? And if you trust Joe to coin your money, why would Joe not have the same grandiose plans the Rothschilds supposedly had? In other words.. unless you intend to coin the money yourself (which I will not trust you to).. I do not see how your plan would change anything.

i wouldn't know how to, nor would i want to coin money, it would obviously have no worth at all, but there are genuine economists out there who know how to do it without causing run away hyperinflation and maintain stability of the value.


i don't profess to have all or any of the answers, but let me ask you a couple questions...how did America get to be so prosperous when the US colonies were printing their own money?

did you know that the British empire was actually built using the Tally Stick System?

the Tally Stick was a form of money which was "coined" and regulated by the king of England and was the most successful form of money the world has ever known


if its been done in the past with success, then i'm sure we can do it now

Universe wrote:Having said that, I think this is becoming one of the most sensible complaints you have lodged against reality so far. (That is a thinly veiled compliment.)

why, thank you