Radiance wrote:I know this. I just called Jim out on his idea that because Iran is worse, the UK is a free country.Kit-Fox wrote:I hate to disabuse you Pops & Uni, but the UK system is indeed highly corrupt, the paries while highly dodgy and being as a straight as a 9-bob notearent the real problem in the UK at least.
...No desillusionment here, the situation is not unfamiliar.
Dude, you totally misunderstand. The chemical or pharmaceutical illusion that I'm talking about isn't the rosy coloured shiney world that I see when I smoke pot or when I am tripping.. it's what Avenger refers to with the psychotropic drugs in the water supply etcetera. You know, the mind control stuff, that keeps you happy and obedient. Love it.Apophis The Great wrote:Radiance wrote:Hence why I personally refuse to meddle in the affairs of the lower class, the dark, decaying and gloomy side of society. I prefer the sunshine just above the middle. Chemically or pharmaceutically induced? Perhaps. It doesn't change the fact that it is sunshine.
As for seeing the world as positive and have happiness, as long as it's not thru drugs and other forbidden things, it is acceptable. But well, it's not always easy to be positive, which doesn't mean taking drugs or stuff like that to counter it, is to be done. As we all know, drugs are forbidden, and should remain so (otherwise we would have just too many negative effects). Just to tell, my apparent blindness regarding the evilness behind the curtain doesn't come from any drug (aka the world is marvellous or no idea what kind of utopian view), I don't see the rivers of rainbows from mushrooms or anything of that sort. They indeed also tend to destroy stuff and annoy people or be out of things completly. But that's not the debate.
My point was, just because world isn't fair, is corrupt or whatever, or because you want to be happy, doesn't mean you should take illegal substances to blind yourself into a wonderful *fake* world, otherwise, you would more likely regret it a way or another, a moment or another!
Too much people tend to do that, for various reasons, among which what we are debating about currently is part of those.
Ah well.. I am out of here again.Good talk, people, good talk.
My bad, I *totally* forgot about those things.
Now your post looks more logical. I was a bit confused.
Don Karnage wrote:[KMA]Avenger wrote:Jim, ARE YOU SERIOUS? i cannot believe what i am reading!!!
Pops is like the perfect example of those people that blindly submit to their government, you should ignore him.
Another frustrated-by-the-system attempting to do a dig at me. (awww!) From the local I criticize all and don't vote (and even criticize voters, roflmao!), as well as boasting about knowing all (while obviously having *no* clue of what they are talking about, when refering to other people, here being me).
Typical kind of people who are generally ignored in such debates. Given they are completly static to their stance.
At least I admit I probably wouldn't vote in banana republics, but it doesn't mean I feel -or would feel- like the all knowing one, because I wouldn't vote compared to others who would vote, and accuse them of being sheeps or no idea what (that would be quite a bad move of mine!).
But well, talking about what you have no clue of (like assuming stuff about me, which happens to be utterly false, expectable though), generally tends to throw nonsense. Oh well...
Nevermind! I should ignore you!






