StarGateWars Forums

Posted: **Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:25 am**

Randomness good. Weirdness good. Complaining bad.
Bye.

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:08 am**

'Order of' is just a silly cheap cop-out Zeratul. You're being told by the majority of users the titles are crud...

Will you please listen to us lol...

Ships = no.
random nonsense = no.

just give a nice linear neutral set of forum titles... You're concerned that forum rank may not accurately represent peoples posting quality. That's just tuff luck and the way the world works for reasonable systems. Some people don't get promoted over others... some people put more time and effort in doing all they can to impress, even if it includes mistakes and nonsense and get the promotions... sometimes the careful sitter backers who only act when it's calculated and exclusive relevant are passed up on because they lack character and fortitude.

Ascended Ranks-

Prior (0-100)
Prophet (100 - 200)
Messiah (200 - 300)
Incarnate (300 - 400)
Living God (400 - 500)
LG+1 (500 - 600)
LG+2 (600 - 700)
+3 (700 - 800)
+4 (800 - 900)
AG (900 - 1000)
EAG (1000 - 1100)
AGL (1100 - 1200)
IAG (1200 - 1400)
TAG (1400 - 2000)
PTAG (2000 - 2500)
LTAG (2500 - 3000)
QTAG (3000 - 3500)
KTAG (3500 - 4000)
GAG (4000 - 5000)
OOE (5000 - 6000)
UnSpk (6000 - 8000)
UnNmd (8000 - 10,000)
UnKnw (10,000+)

on and on and on.... (admits he does not know all ascension titles..)

others:
Set 1 -
Forum Newbie (0 - 100)
Forum Grunt (100 - 300)
Forum Intermediate (300 - 500)
Forum Regular (500 - 2000)
Forum Elder (2000 - 4000)
Forum Veteran (4000 - 5000)
Forum Overlord (5000 - 7000)
Forum Spammer (7000 - 9000)
Forum Freak (9000 - 11000)
Forum Addict (11000 - 20,000)
Forum God (20,000+)

Set 2 - (same boundaries as above)
Forum Peasant
Forum Commoner
Forum Worker
Forum Servant
Forum Earl
Forum Baron
Forum Knight
Forum Lord
Forum Royalty
Forum God
Forum Fossil

Set 3 - (questionable neutrality.. :shock:

)
Forum Atheist (0 - 66)
Forum Sceptic (66 - 666)
Forum Agnostic (666 - 800)
Forum Believer (or Theist..) (800 - 1000)
Forum Practitioner (1000 - 2500)
Forum Prior (2500 - 3500)
Forum Chaplain (3500 - 4500)
Forum Bishop (4500 - 7500)
Forum Cardinal (7500 - 8500)
Forum Pope (8500 - 10,000)
Forum Saint (10,000+)

Set 4 - (Inspiration taken from hollywood A-list, B-list etc etc..)
E List (0 - 500)
D List (500 - 1000)
C list (1000 - 2000)
B List (2000 - 5000)
A List (5000+)

SG Ranks -
Airman (0 - 100)
Staff Sergeant (100 - 300)
2nd Lieutenant (300 - 600)
Lieutenant (600 - 800)
Captain (800 - 1000)
Major (1000 - 2000)
Lieutenant Colonel (2500 - 3500)
Colonel (3500 - 5000)
Brigadier General (5000 - 7000)
Major General (7000 - 8000)
Lieutenant General (8000 - 9000)
General (9000 - 10,000)
I.O.A Committee Inspector (10,000 - 15,000)
I.O.A Board Member (15,000+)

(only used ranks that I am aware have been referred to/spoken about in show or held by 'main' cast member..)

SG 2-
Slave (0 - 400)
Servant (400 - 500)
Jaffa (500 - 700)
Jaffa Command (700 - 800)
First Prime (800 - 1500)
Lotar (1500 - 2500)
Minor Goa'uld (2500 - 3500)
Minion Goa'uld (3500 - 5000)
System Lord (5000 - 10,000)
Supreme System Lord (10,000+)

Just some suggestions.. but you've got plenty there!

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:15 am**

Thumbs Up for Semper proposals!

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:18 am**

Radiance wrote:Randomness good. Weirdness good. Complaining bad.
Bye.

I agree.

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:19 am**

1= boring
2+3=ok but not terribly inspired, better than current
4= people aint gonna like it
5= too short
6= not to fond of it
7= not good if your not a gould

tis good to have suggestions though

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:03 am**

Man Called Jim wrote:1= boring
2+3=ok but not terribly inspired, better than current
4= people aint gonna like it
5= too short
6= not to fond of it
7= not good if your not a gould

tis good to have suggestions though

lol. What exactly would you believe to be an exciting variant on forum ranks? A mass of randomly put together eccentric words? Or some nonsense put together that appeals more closer to home?

0-50 Gunz's Non Sequitur target
50-100 Qacols Purse
100 - 200 The Odin's Pimp Hat
200-300 Elladan's Coma Bed
300-500 Pop's Agony Aunt
500-700 Zeratuls Zergling
700-1000 Rhett's cheater
1000-1200 REK's Gangsta Possy
1200-2000 Buck's Spam Tin
2000-5000 Semper's Newbie
5000-8000 Jack's B-itch
8000-10,000 Psi's Life
10,000+ Jason's disciple

I will very much enjoy to hear this....

How about we use disjointed film ranks... lol.

Ninja
Wizard
Time Lord
Jedi
Ninja Wizard
Muppet

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:08 am**

Semper wrote:
Man Called Jim wrote:1= boring
2+3=ok but not terribly inspired, better than current
4= people aint gonna like it
5= too short
6= not to fond of it
7= not good if your not a gould

tis good to have suggestions though

lol. What exactly would you believe to be an exciting variant on forum ranks? A mass of randomly put together eccentric words? Or some nonsense put together that appeals more closer to home?

0-50 Gunz's Non Sequitur target
50-100 Qacols Purse
100 - 200 The Odin's Pimp Hat
200-300 Elladan's Coma Bed
300-500 Pop's Agony Aunt
500-700 Zeratuls Zergling
700-1000 Rhett's cheater
1000-1200 REK's Gangsta Possy
1200-2000 Buck's Spam Tin
2000-5000 Semper's Newbie
5000-8000 Jack's B-itch
8000-10,000 Psi's Life
10,000+ Jason's disciple

I will very much enjoy to hear this....

How about we use disjointed film ranks... lol.

Ninja
Wizard
Time Lord
Jedi
Ninja Wizard
Muppet

I would like to not be included into your hardcore sarcastic strikebacks at others' belittling -towards your ideas-, if it is to be more-or-less negative towards my character..especially when I have barely any link(s) with the matter in question, excepted a positive feedback, towards criticized suggestion by the target of your above strikeback. :-s

When I was being emo, I was -logically- quite annoying to people, but please, don't try to endorse me presently with the label of past times, nowadays vanished. Thank you very much!

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:11 am**

Semper wrote:
Man Called Jim wrote:1= boring
2+3=ok but not terribly inspired, better than current
4= people aint gonna like it
5= too short
6= not to fond of it
7= not good if your not a gould

tis good to have suggestions though

lol. What exactly would you believe to be an exciting variant on forum ranks? A mass of randomly put together eccentric words? Or some nonsense put together that appeals more closer to home?

0-50 Gunz's Non Sequitur target
50-100 Qacols Purse
100 - 200 The Odin's Pimp Hat
200-300 Elladan's Coma Bed
300-500 Pop's Agony Aunt
500-700 Zeratuls Zergling
700-1000 Rhett's cheater
1000-1200 REK's Gangsta Possy
1200-2000 Buck's Spam Tin
2000-5000 Semper's Newbie
5000-8000 Jack's B-itch
8000-10,000 Psi's Life
10,000+ Jason's disciple

I will very much enjoy to hear this....

How about we use disjointed film ranks... lol.

Ninja
Wizard
Time Lord
Jedi
Ninja Wizard
Muppet

Man Called Jim wrote:I think somebody mentioned something along these lines but:

Forum Traveler
Space Explorer
Fleet Builder
Planet conqueror
World Expander
Solar Master
System Controller
Galaxy Quester
Galaxy Lord
Gate Builder
Forum God

Rough outline kinda thing. I think its quite cool.

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:24 am**

Don Karnage wrote:
Man Called Jim wrote:1= boring
2+3=ok but not terribly inspired, better than current
4= people aint gonna like it
5= too short
6= not to fond of it
7= not good if your not a gould

tis good to have suggestions though

If you don't like the suggestions, then either make adjustments to them, make suggestions of your own or shush.

Semper's post is the best suggestion to do.

Though I would prefer this set up for the Air Force ranks set up.

[spoiler]Raw recruits:
FNG (0 - 50)

Enlisted men:
Airman Basic (50 - 100)
Airman (100 - 150)
Airman First Class (150 - 200)
Senior Airman (200 - 250)

Junior NCOs:
Staff Sergeant (250 - 350)
Technical Sergeant (350 - 500)

Senior NCOs:
Master Sergeant (500 - 750)
Senior Master Sergeant (750 - 1000)
Chief Master Sergeant (1000 - 2000)

Commissioned Officers:
2d Lt Second Lieutenant (2000 - 2500)
First Lieutenant (2500 - 3000)
Captain (3000 - 3500)
Major (3500 - 4000)
Lieutenant Colonel (4500 - 5000)
Colonel (5000 - 6000)

Generals:
Brigadier General (6000 - 7000)
Major General (7000 - 8000)
Lieutenant General (8000 - 9000)
General (9000 - 10,000)

IOA:
I.O.A. Agent (10,000 - 15,000)
I.O.A. Committee Inspector (15,000 - 20,000)
I.O.A. Board Member (20,000+)[/spoiler]

I have made a suggestion and im just giving my opinion on semps suggestion as this thread is about opinions on forum titles.

On the military titles i dont think the last ones are very good. It kinda seems like a step down for me going from General to "board member". Im not a massive army fan though so im kinda biased there.

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:33 am**

actually i really like it, i just dont think everyone on the forum should be given an army name. conscription i tell thee! conscription!!!

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:48 am**

I should yeah :-D

but i forget details like that. And i know from how you layed it out that they outrank generalls, im just saying that to a lot of people it wont sound as good

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:36 pm**

Lol... sorry man called Jim.. I am waiting for these 'exciting' titles.. so far you've given me a list that's pretty much no more exciting than anything I have given.. other than the fact it incorporates more ridiculous titles that are here there and everywhere... forum traveller to space explorer..to fleet builder...to planet explorer and world conqueror back to solar master and then system controller. System controller and solar master? Half of these things would require one or the other as prerequisites before they continue.. yet at the same time.. one cannot forget the brainless abandonment of it being forum related..until of course you equate conquering the known galaxy to being a forum god...

By this reckoning let's have a set of forum ranks.. that go from being ranked as some species of deep sea fish to being ranked as some celestial body and then a forum poster! :lol:

Sticking a forum related title at either end and then putting any old chimpanzee poo'ed mound in the middle is just as out there as using a list of ships.

Forum Newbie
Shrimp
Shore side crustacean
Land Mammal
Terran Master
Air explorer
Planet Dominator
Moon Owner
planet
forum master

#-o

@ Jim. Lighten up jim... it was an example and not meant in offence.. well.. if you took it in offence it's a bonus because it's amusing you did so.. but it wasn't meant that way.

@ Jack. I removed most of the USAF ranks on purpose.. because it's meant to be more light-hearted and focused on SG. Half those ranks never had any relevance in the SG universe and are not necessary. On top of that... where as the primary cast did use USAF ranks we have seen examples of British, Canadian and Russian ranks used so I wanted to make sure most of the ranks used were also incorporated into their armed forces.

I still think either one of the more bland, neutral list's.. or the SG focused USAF ranks will be good, if not them.. then the ascension titles...

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:37 pm**

its TGW now anyway

.
But there are tons of people that havnt watched sgw and still play this game. i hadnt seen any when i first started playing. and take Lore for example... seen half an episode i believe

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:48 pm**

Semper wrote:@ Jim. Lighten up jim... it was an example and not meant in offence.. well.. if you took it in offence it's a bonus because it's amusing you did so.. but it wasn't meant that way.

I didn't really take it as an offense, but there are more "obvious" examples to use about me. Spamming general section, constant arguing, formerly forum multi-ing...those are more "famous" negative points of mine than the one you listed. Not to mention I still argue and spam general section, while the one you keep refering about me, is former stuff. :neutral:

Emo one year emo forever I guess..

Posted: **Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:53 pm**

Apophis The Great wrote:
Semper wrote:@ Jim. Lighten up jim... it was an example and not meant in offence.. well.. if you took it in offence it's a bonus because it's amusing you did so.. but it wasn't meant that way.

I didn't really take it as an offense, but there are more "obvious" examples to use about me. Spamming general section, constant arguing, formerly forum multi-ing...those are more "famous" negative points of mine than the one you listed. Not to mention I still argue and spam general section, while the one you keep refering about me, is former stuff.

Emo one year emo forever I guess..

hmmm.... now.. let me say this slowly. Many of the truth's we cling to depend greatly on our own points of view. To me... the one I listed was the most obvious.. none of the above. Not the multies.. certainly not the arguing or spamming.

StarGateWars Forums

Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??

Re: Forum Titles??