Re: Server War III - The Participants
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:16 pm
it ll be called : Toward The Blackhole
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
Tekki wrote:GOLDEN WING wrote:seriously all it would take is another 2 or 3 alliances joining in on the OE war and the rest shall follow
so come on Tick tock!!!!
Wishful thinking..... or plans to come... either way, you are right, OE does need more farms.
Well the last server war was very damaging to the game. I doubt any war of any length would be less damaging. What makes it a server war? The top 10 alliances all involved?
Lord Yojimbo wrote:Tekki wrote:GOLDEN WING wrote:seriously all it would take is another 2 or 3 alliances joining in on the OE war and the rest shall follow
so come on Tick tock!!!!
Wishful thinking..... or plans to come... either way, you are right, OE does need more farms.
Well the last server war was very damaging to the game. I doubt any war of any length would be less damaging. What makes it a server war? The top 10 alliances all involved?
Damaging in what way from your perspective may i ask?
Tekki wrote:Another server war will just see a heap of accounts being sold or abandoned and the numbers of people playing reduced even further. If we want that, then sure we can do that, but less people = bad and the fact that there is less people STILL from the last one just proves my point. The game still hasn't recovered.
But if that's what alliances want to bring against us - OE, then so be it.
Kjarkur wrote:Tekki wrote:Another server war will just see a heap of accounts being sold or abandoned and the numbers of people playing reduced even further. If we want that, then sure we can do that, but less people = bad and the fact that there is less people STILL from the last one just proves my point. The game still hasn't recovered.
But if that's what alliances want to bring against us - OE, then so be it.
I don't think that everyone here actually wants a server war. People are just messing around I believe and discussing what sides would be fun to see.
I've been getting PM's accusing me of planning server war 3. I do mess around and yell "start server war now" etc - but I think I'm being given more credit then I deserve. If I'm really that powerful that I can do that on my own I'm very pleased though.
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:As of this moment, there are no plans to change any current relations with other alliances. We are an alliance of peace, as long as you don't **Filtered** with us.

Kjarkur wrote:AG accepts any challenge and will fight anyone that wishes to fight.
Lithium wrote:Kjarkur wrote:AG accepts any challenge and will fight anyone that wishes to fight.
ya got no ballz to wage war without support.
Huxley wrote:Lithium wrote:Kjarkur wrote:AG accepts any challenge and will fight anyone that wishes to fight.
ya got no ballz to wage war without support.
Who said he had no support?
You have balls to talk without proper information.. *chuckles*Lithium wrote:ya got no ballz to wage war without support.Kjarkur wrote:AG accepts any challenge and will fight anyone that wishes to fight.
Tekki wrote:Lord Yojimbo wrote:Tekki wrote:GOLDEN WING wrote:seriously all it would take is another 2 or 3 alliances joining in on the OE war and the rest shall follow
so come on Tick tock!!!!
Wishful thinking..... or plans to come... either way, you are right, OE does need more farms.
Well the last server war was very damaging to the game. I doubt any war of any length would be less damaging. What makes it a server war? The top 10 alliances all involved?
Damaging in what way from your perspective may i ask?
JT said it quite well actually. There are less people ingame from the last server war. Another never-ending war, or 2-3 year war would mean a lot less people as members left and abandoned or sold their accounts.
While it sounds attractive, it's not the way to go. Yes it allows growth but it also DICTATES ONLY ONE way of playing.
*chuckles* How many people continued playing their own way in the previous server wars? I know I did, and most of my alliances did.. when we participated in the first one, it was our own decision. *grin*Tekki wrote:JT said it quite well actually. There are less people ingame from the last server war. Another never-ending war, or 2-3 year war would mean a lot less people as members left and abandoned or sold their accounts.Lord Yojimbo wrote:Damaging in what way from your perspective may i ask?
While it sounds attractive, it's not the way to go. Yes it allows growth but it also DICTATES ONLY ONE way of playing.
Juliette wrote:*chuckles* How many people continued playing their own way in the previous server wars? I know I did, and most of my alliances did.. when we participated in the first one, it was our own decision. *grin*Tekki wrote:JT said it quite well actually. There are less people ingame from the last server war. Another never-ending war, or 2-3 year war would mean a lot less people as members left and abandoned or sold their accounts.Lord Yojimbo wrote:Damaging in what way from your perspective may i ask?
While it sounds attractive, it's not the way to go. Yes it allows growth but it also DICTATES ONLY ONE way of playing.
And the point JT was making was that more people left over the past year without a server war than did during or directly after it.
(the art of clear posting is not my strong point)