Page 6 of 10

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:16 pm
by Lithium
it ll be called : Toward The Blackhole

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:17 pm
by Lord Yojimbo
Tekki wrote:
GOLDEN WING wrote:seriously all it would take is another 2 or 3 alliances joining in on the OE war and the rest shall follow :)

so come on Tick tock!!!!

Wishful thinking..... or plans to come... either way, you are right, OE does need more farms.

Well the last server war was very damaging to the game. I doubt any war of any length would be less damaging. What makes it a server war? The top 10 alliances all involved?


Damaging in what way from your perspective may i ask? :)

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:18 pm
by jedi~tank
There has been a ton of that talk..meaning how to avoid things so we dont lose more members, and so others can catch up....the "so others can catch up" is a useless argument..in order to catch up one has to play..the more they play the faster they catch up. So my question is, is anyone or everyone recruiting new people into the game? The never ending war argument is weak now as well, I saw allot of players thrive on it. ALLOT thrive on it.

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:19 pm
by Tekki
Lord Yojimbo wrote:
Tekki wrote:
GOLDEN WING wrote:seriously all it would take is another 2 or 3 alliances joining in on the OE war and the rest shall follow :)

so come on Tick tock!!!!

Wishful thinking..... or plans to come... either way, you are right, OE does need more farms.

Well the last server war was very damaging to the game. I doubt any war of any length would be less damaging. What makes it a server war? The top 10 alliances all involved?


Damaging in what way from your perspective may i ask? :)

JT said it quite well actually. There are less people ingame from the last server war. Another never-ending war, or 2-3 year war would mean a lot less people as members left and abandoned or sold their accounts.

While it sounds attractive, it's not the way to go. Yes it allows growth but it also DICTATES ONLY ONE way of playing.

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:21 pm
by Kjarkur
Tekki wrote:Another server war will just see a heap of accounts being sold or abandoned and the numbers of people playing reduced even further. If we want that, then sure we can do that, but less people = bad and the fact that there is less people STILL from the last one just proves my point. The game still hasn't recovered.

But if that's what alliances want to bring against us - OE, then so be it.


I don't think that everyone here actually wants a server war. People are just messing around I believe and discussing what sides would be fun to see.

I've been getting PM's accusing me of planning server war 3. I do mess around and yell "start server war now" etc - all just in good fun - but I think I'm being given more credit then I deserve. If I'm really that powerful that I can do that on my own I'm very pleased though. 8)

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:23 pm
by jedi~tank
Kjarkur wrote:
Tekki wrote:Another server war will just see a heap of accounts being sold or abandoned and the numbers of people playing reduced even further. If we want that, then sure we can do that, but less people = bad and the fact that there is less people STILL from the last one just proves my point. The game still hasn't recovered.

But if that's what alliances want to bring against us - OE, then so be it.


I don't think that everyone here actually wants a server war. People are just messing around I believe and discussing what sides would be fun to see.

I've been getting PM's accusing me of planning server war 3. I do mess around and yell "start server war now" etc - but I think I'm being given more credit then I deserve. If I'm really that powerful that I can do that on my own I'm very pleased though. 8)

Yea me2..anyways Server war 3 participants..DDE definately in.

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:25 pm
by Tekki
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:As of this moment, there are no plans to change any current relations with other alliances. We are an alliance of peace, as long as you don't **Filtered** with us.

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:25 pm
by Kjarkur
AG accepts any challenge and will fight anyone that wishes to fight. :-D

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:31 pm
by Lithium
Kjarkur wrote:AG accepts any challenge and will fight anyone that wishes to fight. :-D


ya got no ballz to wage war without support.

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:00 pm
by Huxley
Lithium wrote:
Kjarkur wrote:AG accepts any challenge and will fight anyone that wishes to fight. :-D


ya got no ballz to wage war without support.


Who said he had no support?

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:01 pm
by jedi~tank
Huxley wrote:
Lithium wrote:
Kjarkur wrote:AG accepts any challenge and will fight anyone that wishes to fight. :-D


ya got no ballz to wage war without support.


Who said he had no support?

+1

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:11 pm
by Juliette
Lithium wrote:
Kjarkur wrote:AG accepts any challenge and will fight anyone that wishes to fight. :-D
ya got no ballz to wage war without support.
You have balls to talk without proper information.. *chuckles*

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:29 pm
by Lord Yojimbo
Tekki wrote:
Lord Yojimbo wrote:
Tekki wrote:
GOLDEN WING wrote:seriously all it would take is another 2 or 3 alliances joining in on the OE war and the rest shall follow :)

so come on Tick tock!!!!

Wishful thinking..... or plans to come... either way, you are right, OE does need more farms.

Well the last server war was very damaging to the game. I doubt any war of any length would be less damaging. What makes it a server war? The top 10 alliances all involved?


Damaging in what way from your perspective may i ask? :)

JT said it quite well actually. There are less people ingame from the last server war. Another never-ending war, or 2-3 year war would mean a lot less people as members left and abandoned or sold their accounts.

While it sounds attractive, it's not the way to go. Yes it allows growth but it also DICTATES ONLY ONE way of playing.


Thats a fair point :)

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:56 pm
by Juliette
Tekki wrote:
Lord Yojimbo wrote:Damaging in what way from your perspective may i ask? :)
JT said it quite well actually. There are less people ingame from the last server war. Another never-ending war, or 2-3 year war would mean a lot less people as members left and abandoned or sold their accounts.
While it sounds attractive, it's not the way to go. Yes it allows growth but it also DICTATES ONLY ONE way of playing.
*chuckles* How many people continued playing their own way in the previous server wars? I know I did, and most of my alliances did.. when we participated in the first one, it was our own decision. *grin*

And the point JT was making was that more people left over the past year without a server war than did during or directly after it. ;)

Re: Server War III - The Participants

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:58 pm
by jedi~tank
Juliette wrote:
Tekki wrote:
Lord Yojimbo wrote:Damaging in what way from your perspective may i ask? :)
JT said it quite well actually. There are less people ingame from the last server war. Another never-ending war, or 2-3 year war would mean a lot less people as members left and abandoned or sold their accounts.
While it sounds attractive, it's not the way to go. Yes it allows growth but it also DICTATES ONLY ONE way of playing.
*chuckles* How many people continued playing their own way in the previous server wars? I know I did, and most of my alliances did.. when we participated in the first one, it was our own decision. *grin*

And the point JT was making was that more people left over the past year without a server war than did during or directly after it. ;)

Yes, thank you thats what I meant :smt050 (the art of clear posting is not my strong point)