StarGateWars Forums

Oh this is grand. AG have a problem with a player in the game declaring a vendetta after his planet is taken? Surely there have been countless vendettas that have happened over planet theft without the whole empire/alliance trying to substitute players and escalate the situation...

I also know of many vendettas that have been left alone without any drama while a player has carried out 2 or more vendettas.

I think I can safely take away that a player from AG cannot fight a 2v1...how the level of quality players goes down, remarkable.

I also can't help but wonder, would AG just sit and do nothing if a player took a 0 def planet from them? And if they declare a vendetta, should that player just let his alliance sub in a more powerful member - one that clearly outmatches the opposition?

For honor, for glory? Right. Quite funny this thread.

xDaku wrote:Oh this is grand. AG have a problem with a player in the game declaring a vendetta after his planet is taken? Surely there have been countless vendettas that have happened over planet theft without the whole empire/alliance trying to substitute players and escalate the situation...

I also know of many vendettas that have been left alone without any drama while a player has carried out 2 or more vendettas.

I think I can safely take away that a player from AG cannot fight a 2v1...how the level of quality players goes down, remarkable.

I also can't help but wonder, would AG just sit and do nothing if a player took a 0 def planet from them? And if they declare a vendetta, should that player just let his alliance sub in a more powerful member - one that clearly outmatches the opposition?

For honor, for glory? Right. Quite funny this thread.

this is from a FS member.....ROFL !!!

but allow me to enlighten you, i was vendetta'd whilst in a vendetta by a person who had no reason to vendetta me, the person who could have taken offence has done nothing but hide behind tetris and shout insults over the top of him like a ... well you get the jiist

Guild wrote:i dont matter what goes down now... cos quite simply tetris is draggin HVE into a war it does not want ..

Yes, how dare he defend himself and his Alliance by declaring Vendetta's!!! What a horrible thing to do.

I kind of didn't expect all this from you Guild, but I guess I should have. Like I said in the other topic, we were so nice to you. You applied to HVE under an alias after coming back from quitting the game. You didn't want anyone to know it was you because apparently some people wanted to mass you. So we kept your identity a secret. I thought that would be deserving of some respect, or you being nice to us or ... something. I guess I was wrong and it only means we get our planets taken.

Also I wasn't the only person you took from in HVE ... so it's Tetris fighting for HVE, not just for me. Further, I'm quite sure I've not been insulting.

E.M.P. wrote:

Guild wrote:i dont matter what goes down now... cos quite simply tetris is draggin HVE into a war it does not want ..

Yes, how dare he defend himself and his Alliance by declaring Vendetta's!!! What a horrible thing to do.

I kind of didn't expect all this from you Guild, but I guess I should have. Like I said in the other topic, we were so nice to you. You applied to HVE under an alias after coming back from quitting the game. You didn't want anyone to know it was you because apparently some people wanted to mass you. So we kept your identity a secret. I thought that would be deserving of some respect, or you being nice to us or ... something. I guess I was wrong and it only means we get our planets taken.

Also I wasn't the only person you took from in HVE ... so it's Tetris fighting for HVE, not just for me. Further, I'm quite sure I've not been insulting.

hahaa not cos people wanting to mass me , i was deciding if i wanted to come back luv

pffft fightin for HVE, naaa fightin for you who doesnt want to man up and deal with something himself.

tetris only wants to fight anyone he can for HVE... i seriously doubt it tbh his persona does not fit HVE

Malx wrote:I dare you to take a planet from either ETL or JT. You take from people that would not overly harm you. Don't take advantage of people's good will and civil being, that shows weakness and very bad manners, things that stick with you like a label in this comunity. This being said, OE has been topped in my list as "most people i have sticky fingers towards". I'd take ETL to a bear next to what i've seen in this thread.

So what you are saying is..

You can take planets from those who are weaker: which is unfair and cowardly.
Or can take from those who are stronger: which is obviously stupid.

Shall we just never take any planets at all then?

This is besides the fact that EMP has more than enough stats to take on myself or slayers.

xDaku wrote:I also can't help but wonder, would AG just sit and do nothing if a player took a 0 def planet from them?

Personally If I could not take it back I would not attack further but that's just me.

Guild wrote:

E.M.P. wrote:

Guild wrote:i dont matter what goes down now... cos quite simply tetris is draggin HVE into a war it does not want ..

Yes, how dare he defend himself and his Alliance by declaring Vendetta's!!! What a horrible thing to do.

I kind of didn't expect all this from you Guild, but I guess I should have. Like I said in the other topic, we were so nice to you. You applied to HVE under an alias after coming back from quitting the game. You didn't want anyone to know it was you because apparently some people wanted to mass you. So we kept your identity a secret. I thought that would be deserving of some respect, or you being nice to us or ... something. I guess I was wrong and it only means we get our planets taken.

Also I wasn't the only person you took from in HVE ... so it's Tetris fighting for HVE, not just for me. Further, I'm quite sure I've not been insulting.

hahaa not cos people wanting to mass me , i was deciding if i wanted to come back luv

pffft fightin for HVE, naaa fightin for you who doesnt want to man up and deal with something himself.

tetris only wants to fight anyone he can for HVE... i seriously doubt it tbh his persona does not fit HVE

Why does it matter who does it? Like I said, I'm not the only one who could have started a vendetta with you. I thought you couldn't handle more than 1 person at a time, did you want a 5v1? Or just a 1v1 with Tetris?

Tetris enjoys warring much more than I, or anyone else, that is why he was chosen to declare it on behalf of HVE. You're the one who couldn't handle it, you had to have it postponed.

This topic isn't about that Vendetta though, it's about Tziki vs Tetris. So I'll stop talking about this now.

About the naq hits bit, I've restrained myself to hit for naq due to the potential accusations of "increased farming" from us, but I've noticed several times that there were hits possible within the minimal standard of mine "10bil naq per 100bil def", with my minimal hits at 40b naq.
Just to clear things up with "leaving too much out" vs "hitting for ridiculous amounts" argument.
Anyway, I don't "farm" people except inactives (farm list), I just do profitable naq hits with no war declaration when I scan rankings.

E.M.P. wrote:

Guild wrote:

E.M.P. wrote:

Guild wrote:i dont matter what goes down now... cos quite simply tetris is draggin HVE into a war it does not want ..

Yes, how dare he defend himself and his Alliance by declaring Vendetta's!!! What a horrible thing to do.

I kind of didn't expect all this from you Guild, but I guess I should have. Like I said in the other topic, we were so nice to you. You applied to HVE under an alias after coming back from quitting the game. You didn't want anyone to know it was you because apparently some people wanted to mass you. So we kept your identity a secret. I thought that would be deserving of some respect, or you being nice to us or ... something. I guess I was wrong and it only means we get our planets taken.

Also I wasn't the only person you took from in HVE ... so it's Tetris fighting for HVE, not just for me. Further, I'm quite sure I've not been insulting.

hahaa not cos people wanting to mass me , i was deciding if i wanted to come back luv

pffft fightin for HVE, naaa fightin for you who doesnt want to man up and deal with something himself.

tetris only wants to fight anyone he can for HVE... i seriously doubt it tbh his persona does not fit HVE

Why does it matter who does it? Like I said, I'm not the only one who could have started a vendetta with you. I thought you couldn't handle more than 1 person at a time, did you want a 5v1? Or just a 1v1 with Tetris?

Tetris enjoys warring much more than I, or anyone else, that is why he was chosen to declare it on behalf of HVE. You're the one who couldn't handle it, you had to have it postponed.

This topic isn't about that Vendetta though, it's about Tziki vs Tetris. So I'll stop talking about this now.

ok ill accept the vendetta now ... that is the one from the two people i took planets of , you and auke. im waiting emp

Guild wrote:

xDaku wrote:Oh this is grand. AG have a problem with a player in the game declaring a vendetta after his planet is taken? Surely there have been countless vendettas that have happened over planet theft without the whole empire/alliance trying to substitute players and escalate the situation...

I also know of many vendettas that have been left alone without any drama while a player has carried out 2 or more vendettas.

I think I can safely take away that a player from AG cannot fight a 2v1...how the level of quality players goes down, remarkable.

I also can't help but wonder, would AG just sit and do nothing if a player took a 0 def planet from them? And if they declare a vendetta, should that player just let his alliance sub in a more powerful member - one that clearly outmatches the opposition?

For honor, for glory? Right. Quite funny this thread.

this is from a FS member.....ROFL !!!

but allow me to enlighten you, i was vendetta'd whilst in a vendetta by a person who had no reason to vendetta me, the person who could have taken offence has done nothing but hide behind tetris and shout insults over the top of him like a ... well you get the jiist

You wanna take us on mate? Coyle or me, your pick. We've both been itching to get our hands dirty for a while now.

Allow me to enlighten you, this isn't your vendetta. What?!! Really?!!

Oh yes, this has nothing to do with you and tetris' issues, that's completely separate. Guess you haven't read the title of this thread yet. Now if you want to discuss Tziki vs. Tetris, then I fail to see the problem in a player discussing a vendetta based on a planet theft.

Can't handle 2v1.

And us FS players have been playing against odds in numbers for years mate, check out where we stand and where are opponent does

Guild wrote:

xDaku wrote:Oh this is grand. AG have a problem with a player in the game declaring a vendetta after his planet is taken? Surely there have been countless vendettas that have happened over planet theft without the whole empire/alliance trying to substitute players and escalate the situation...

I also know of many vendettas that have been left alone without any drama while a player has carried out 2 or more vendettas.

I think I can safely take away that a player from AG cannot fight a 2v1...how the level of quality players goes down, remarkable.

I also can't help but wonder, would AG just sit and do nothing if a player took a 0 def planet from them? And if they declare a vendetta, should that player just let his alliance sub in a more powerful member - one that clearly outmatches the opposition?

For honor, for glory? Right. Quite funny this thread.

this is from a FS member.....ROFL !!!

but allow me to enlighten you, i was vendetta'd whilst in a vendetta by a person who had no reason to vendetta me, the person who could have taken offence has done nothing but hide behind tetris and shout insults over the top of him like a ... well you get the jiist

You wanna take us on mate? Coyle or me, your pick. We've both been itching to get our hands dirty for a while now.

Allow me to enlighten you, this isn't your vendetta. What?!! Really?!!

Oh yes, this has nothing to do with you and tetris' issues, that's completely separate. Guess you haven't read the title of this thread yet. Now if you want to discuss Tziki vs. Tetris, then I fail to see the problem in a player discussing a vendetta based on a planet theft.

Can't handle 2v1.

And us FS players have been playing against odds in numbers for years mate, check out where we stand and where are opponent does

Boring.... enough with the talking crap, just fight damn it.

SuperSaiyan wrote:

Cole wrote:About the naq hits bit, I've restrained myself to hit for naq due to the potential accusations of "increased farming" from us, but I've noticed several times that there were hits possible within the minimal standard of mine "10bil naq per 100bil def", with my minimal hits at 40b naq.
Just to clear things up with "leaving too much out" vs "hitting for ridiculous amounts" argument.

We're not arguing that we don't have naq out that is profitable, who doesn't?
Our point is, the moment all this started the frequency you guys have been hitting has increased :s

I've had and have NAP's and such with OE, DDE, mH, TL, FS and i never hit HVE. Still, i farmed as much as i pleased. So the "they had naq out all the time" excuse doesn't exist.

SuperSaiyan wrote:We're not arguing that we don't have naq out that is profitable, who doesn't?
Our point is, the moment all this started the frequency you guys have been hitting has increased :s

Mere co-insidence. Things like the planet-theft may have indeed come to our attention because of all this stuff-however it wasn't done as an attack on HVE but just a good hit on a good planet. That is all there is.

xDaku wrote:

Guild wrote:

xDaku wrote:Oh this is grand. AG have a problem with a player in the game declaring a vendetta after his planet is taken? Surely there have been countless vendettas that have happened over planet theft without the whole empire/alliance trying to substitute players and escalate the situation...

I also know of many vendettas that have been left alone without any drama while a player has carried out 2 or more vendettas.

I think I can safely take away that a player from AG cannot fight a 2v1...how the level of quality players goes down, remarkable.

I also can't help but wonder, would AG just sit and do nothing if a player took a 0 def planet from them? And if they declare a vendetta, should that player just let his alliance sub in a more powerful member - one that clearly outmatches the opposition?

For honor, for glory? Right. Quite funny this thread.

this is from a FS member.....ROFL !!!

but allow me to enlighten you, i was vendetta'd whilst in a vendetta by a person who had no reason to vendetta me, the person who could have taken offence has done nothing but hide behind tetris and shout insults over the top of him like a ... well you get the jiist

You wanna take us on mate? Coyle or me, your pick. We've both been itching to get our hands dirty for a while now.

Allow me to enlighten you, this isn't your vendetta. What?!! Really?!!

Oh yes, this has nothing to do with you and tetris' issues, that's completely separate. Guess you haven't read the title of this thread yet. Now if you want to discuss Tziki vs. Tetris, then I fail to see the problem in a player discussing a vendetta based on a planet theft.

Can't handle 2v1.

And us FS players have been playing against odds in numbers for years mate, check out where we stand and where are opponent does

good god man ! who would fight FS i mean you guys are well awesome !! .. no wait let me check my history.... nah your just snipers for the past year, there is only so much DDE can do to your accounts, you do not fight with any honour, doing hit and run attacks and giving no defence.

pffft...im sure in everyones minds when the hear FS they think somewere in their heads .. snipers

Guild wrote:

xDaku wrote:

Guild wrote:

xDaku wrote:Oh this is grand. AG have a problem with a player in the game declaring a vendetta after his planet is taken? Surely there have been countless vendettas that have happened over planet theft without the whole empire/alliance trying to substitute players and escalate the situation...

I also know of many vendettas that have been left alone without any drama while a player has carried out 2 or more vendettas.

I think I can safely take away that a player from AG cannot fight a 2v1...how the level of quality players goes down, remarkable.

I also can't help but wonder, would AG just sit and do nothing if a player took a 0 def planet from them? And if they declare a vendetta, should that player just let his alliance sub in a more powerful member - one that clearly outmatches the opposition?

For honor, for glory? Right. Quite funny this thread.

this is from a FS member.....ROFL !!!

but allow me to enlighten you, i was vendetta'd whilst in a vendetta by a person who had no reason to vendetta me, the person who could have taken offence has done nothing but hide behind tetris and shout insults over the top of him like a ... well you get the jiist

You wanna take us on mate? Coyle or me, your pick. We've both been itching to get our hands dirty for a while now.

Allow me to enlighten you, this isn't your vendetta. What?!! Really?!!

Oh yes, this has nothing to do with you and tetris' issues, that's completely separate. Guess you haven't read the title of this thread yet. Now if you want to discuss Tziki vs. Tetris, then I fail to see the problem in a player discussing a vendetta based on a planet theft.

Can't handle 2v1.

And us FS players have been playing against odds in numbers for years mate, check out where we stand and where are opponent does

good god man ! who would fight FS i mean you guys are well awesome !! .. no wait let me check my history.... nah your just snipers for the past year, there is only so much DDE can do to your accounts, you do not fight with any honour, doing hit and run attacks and giving no defence.

pffft...im sure in everyones minds when the hear FS they think somewere in their heads .. snipers

Be careful mate, we're not HVE. We don't do diplomacy.