StarGateWars Forums

Noobert wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:Well last I checked and in forums the staff is in place to serve the general users, but by what you just posted it is flipped in your mind..sorry m8 there are too many threads about where they were derailed by mods themselves..I say again, mods did not even try anything except spam and joking at the onset of this thread. POINT again. Your actions cannot be justified based on your..well actions.

What the hell are you talking about?

We are in place to serve this FORUM, and you want to know the best part? We enforce the rules, and literally clean up after all the crap you leave behind in the Market when there's a thread that blatantly says "Please put a closed sign when you are done trading, so we may remove the thread." Instead of helping the Moderators, you can't be bothered once you've done your trade to help.

The beginning of this thread was probably a joke all together, but turned into something larger because certain individuals love to cry about **Filtered** they have no reason to cry about.

My actions? They are completely justifiable. Show me where I have warned an individual for spamming in a thread full of spam, and not warned another. Just the other day, I said to a Mod who works under me that he would have to warn every single individual for spamming a Market thread and not just the one person.

It doesn't matter what I say anymore though, you are set in what you think so it's up to you to believe what I say or not.

Zeratul wrote:If the community has serious input on parts of the forum rules, we are naturally willing to listen.

Rabbid Thom wrote:yes but thats what happens when you put your points accross in a thread that had no foundation to begin with, rather than putting it in a separate thread in which it would of had the foundation to be dealt with and not presumed spam adding to the spam that had already proceeded it.

spam attracts spam.

Jedi~Tank wrote:I am merely throwing out some things for discussions here..things are what they are..for example..How often do us regular users get a response such as the one you just gave? I am not pointing my dirty finger at anyone, merely addressing the establishment...Mods stance is always justifiable, mods are always cleaning up "our mess", whenever an issue arises whether legit or not, its "whining" or "complaining", can you see where this is right now? And yes this thread got derailed quickly..but again..who derailed it? Point.

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Zeratul wrote:If the community has serious input on parts of the forum rules, we are naturally willing to listen.

What good would that do? You would just dub it as whining and complaining. With the conduct you mods allowed to run rampant through the forum this past summer pretty much killed your respectability as a staff..and to what botjack just posted..once again, POINT. You see the attitude you people have?

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Rabbid Thom wrote:yes but thats what happens when you put your points accross in a thread that had no foundation to begin with, rather than putting it in a separate thread in which it would of had the foundation to be dealt with and not presumed spam adding to the spam that had already proceeded it.

spam attracts spam.

**Filtered**, stop making excuses and trying to deflect your lack of responsibility and lack of quality work onto another.

Rabbid Thom wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:I am merely throwing out some things for discussions here..things are what they are..for example..How often do us regular users get a response such as the one you just gave? I am not pointing my dirty finger at anyone, merely addressing the establishment...Mods stance is always justifiable, mods are always cleaning up "our mess", whenever an issue arises whether legit or not, its "whining" or "complaining", can you see where this is right now? And yes this thread got derailed quickly..but again..who derailed it? Point.

you started off good here and put some sort of foundation to you previous veiws but then you followed up with:

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Zeratul wrote:If the community has serious input on parts of the forum rules, we are naturally willing to listen.

What good would that do? You would just dub it as whining and complaining. With the conduct you mods allowed to run rampant through the forum this past summer pretty much killed your respectability as a staff..and to what botjack just posted..once again, POINT. You see the attitude you people have?

now that kind of just negates your first post by continuing the bable and so rather than it continuing with constructive Q and A is decends in anarchy and spam

then further more you degrade it with

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Rabbid Thom wrote:yes but thats what happens when you put your points accross in a thread that had no foundation to begin with, rather than putting it in a separate thread in which it would of had the foundation to be dealt with and not presumed spam adding to the spam that had already proceeded it.

spam attracts spam.

**Filtered**, stop making excuses and trying to deflect your lack of responsibility and lack of quality work onto another.

you talk about being over looked yet you over look yourself

further more im gave you advice and then you throw it back at me with something that relates nothing to what i said

Ercury wrote:to solve the "Based" part it quit easy , Mods should use a private user account to express their opinnions

And use their Mod account for what the purpose is ment for

And this might solve it all .

Lithium wrote:Haz why u deleted mu last post in the thread link below
viewtopic.php?f=101&t=186870&start=15

and why that thread which has no clear meaning , it points to nowhere isnt considered spam as u posted there?

Haz wrote:

Lithium wrote:Haz why u deleted mu last post in the thread link below
viewtopic.php?f=101&t=186870&start=15

and why that thread which has no clear meaning , it points to nowhere isnt considered spam as u posted there?

I haven't deleted, or even moved any post in that thread. I gave the verbal warning, then when I was asked to lock it by the user involved, I obliged and locked it.

The thread was on topic within Stargatewars General (Forum for all general ingame discussion) as it was reporting a big milestone ingame and was congratulating the user.

Lithium wrote:

Haz wrote:

Lithium wrote:Haz why u deleted mu last post in the thread link below
viewtopic.php?f=101&t=186870&start=15

and why that thread which has no clear meaning , it points to nowhere isnt considered spam as u posted there?

I haven't deleted, or even moved any post in that thread. I gave the verbal warning, then when I was asked to lock it by the user involved, I obliged and locked it.

The thread was on topic within Stargatewars General (Forum for all general ingame discussion) as it was reporting a big milestone ingame and was congratulating the user.

did kikaz asked u in that moment or what???
and since i asked u b4 and im asking u again , which is the milestone? then u deleted my post and locked it

Haz wrote:

Lithium wrote:

Haz wrote:

Lithium wrote:Haz why u deleted mu last post in the thread link below
viewtopic.php?f=101&t=186870&start=15

and why that thread which has no clear meaning , it points to nowhere isnt considered spam as u posted there?

I haven't deleted, or even moved any post in that thread. I gave the verbal warning, then when I was asked to lock it by the user involved, I obliged and locked it.

The thread was on topic within Stargatewars General (Forum for all general ingame discussion) as it was reporting a big milestone ingame and was congratulating the user.

did kikaz asked u in that moment or what???
and since i asked u b4 and im asking u again , which is the milestone? then u deleted my post and locked it

Yes Kikaz did ask, within PM.

And I didn't see any post by you, I merely edited my previous post and placed a lock on the topic. That may have stopped you from posting your post in the first place?