Page 6 of 12
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:23 pm
by Retribution
HippyFool wrote:He rarely plays for rank - mainly cos he gets angry at someone and masses his whole army away mid era ... and when he starts massing he just keeps going till he has nothing left and has probably pissed off half the active players
Most players will agree that Kikaz certainly makes waves more interesting though.
I call it "dropping a BM", or rather the "Ben-Maneuver"
HippyFool wrote:Retribution wrote:Hippy-hop -- You're obviously one of the best to play the game, mate --
HippyFool wrote:Retribution wrote:but just cause he's ranked highest in the Legends doesn't mean he's the best to ever play. A large chunk of that GnR came from last Era.
....
but, but... I was already top before that wave
...
HippyFool wrote:Haha, nah just joking - I know there are plenty of better players out there than me
Don't mess with me like that man!
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:57 am
by Scenester
09:40 IceBOLT 1173162853574 TimeRipp 942492013390 102,779 untrained units kidnapped
LAME
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:16 am
by Retribution
Scenester wrote:09:40 IceBOLT 1173162853574 TimeRipp 942492013390 102,779 untrained units kidnapped
LAME
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:40 pm
by Teyla
why is hippy banned for nothing and these noobs breaking rules and getting away with it?
feeding is illegalthere
is a rule
timeripp and bloodreign are in this game solely to feed icebolt, now he have stupid size army way above average players
well suck this up
go 2 game updates, YOULL FIND A
RULE UPDATE!
Feb, 2011 - ERA 26 - Solar Flare Powered Quantum Duplication
FeedingFeeding -or using one account solely to power another - is against the rules. There are ingame stoppers -such as limiting maximum gain per attack to a days worth of income, more or less. But
the practise of using one or more accounts solely to feed one main account is against the rules.
Account caught abusing this will be banned. obviously accounts feeding the fed are only active in game to power up the these divs so i await 2 see them all banned, everybody seen them do it so ban them.
i dont know how to make one of these cheat reports 2 the administrator or what his msn is but mabey somebody else can contact him and point the above fact out incase he forgot, he made the rules and he leaves them to be broken, nice,
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
by torak
Scenester wrote:09:40 IceBOLT 1173162853574 TimeRipp 942492013390 102,779 untrained units kidnapped
LAME
So if i raid all my turns ill get to almost 19mil, still 4 mil behind, yet i have a UP over 100k larger. WTH.
Good to know that some people have know respect for other people or themselves.
+ what Teyla says
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:18 pm
by HippyFool
Teyla wrote:why is hippy banned for nothing and these noobs breaking rules and getting away with it?
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:28 pm
by Quina Quen
Why have you been banned Hippy?
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:29 pm
by HippyFool
General Riviera wrote:Why have you been banned Hippy?
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=188521
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:31 pm
by Quina Quen
That's stupid. Hope it gets resolved soon mate.
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:25 pm
by Scenester
Can't remember having hit them really 
Existing Polarized Shields On Me:
ID: 30426 - Blood Reign
ID: 30425 - TimeRipp
Looks like IceBOLT brought his 2 personal farms into safety.
There goes my fun game 
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:28 pm
by Quina Quen
And still no ban.
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:33 pm
by torak
I can put up with it aslong as they are not here coming into the end of the era.
I wish aadmin would do something about this, or atleast confirm something will be done.
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:22 pm
by Retribution
Icy told me last night that he was going to to stop. I can be persuasive.
Although, technically he's already got a big enough advantage from everything he's done so far that probably doesn't NEED to feed anymore to maintain a lead... Well, stay tuned kids.. We're may be in for a bumpy ride.
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:52 pm
by Jimbo 5.3
Retribution wrote:Icy told me last night that he was going to to stop. I can be persuasive.
Although, technically he's already got a big enough advantage from everything he's done so far that probably doesn't NEED to feed anymore to maintain a lead... Well, stay tuned kids.. We're may be in for a bumpy ride.
Good for Icebolt! Once I take out 10million of his units then we might be even! Then again, even if i do, he will have still made more naq than he should have if he never fed, so maybe 12 or 15million units is a bit more reasonable. Or better yet, have Icebolt attack Kikaz, then both feeders will lose units!
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:53 pm
by Rn5ho
pretty sure all the feeders will be dealt with by community before or by end of era. You can't feed naquadah, so you can't build unreachable stats (sure you make more naq with bigger army size.. but pretty sure it's still gonna be reachable to mass).
