StarGateWars Forums

Mathlord wrote:Huxley, we wanted to know what you'd do. You know, it's a pretty funny story. Before you joined, we actually had just gone through a rough time where people were getting antsy and aggressive with each other. Dealing with your tripe and showing the other alliances first hand what you and Omega were willing to go through to hurt us (and them) actually helped inter-alliance relations more than my semi-soft-spoken diplomacy ever could have done.

Oh stop kidding yourself. You are now trying to save what little face TAF have left.

No one willing gives access to there enemies just to see what they would do.

Mathlord wrote:Huxley, we wanted to know what you'd do. You know, it's a pretty funny story. Before you joined, we actually had just gone through a rough time where people were getting antsy and aggressive with each other. Dealing with your tripe and showing the other alliances first hand what you and Omega were willing to go through to hurt us (and them) actually helped inter-alliance relations more than my semi-soft-spoken diplomacy ever could have done.

So I guess you could say we used you, Huxley, to drive home a point. Not to TAF, though it was a good reminder to TAF what OE are willing to do to win. Instead it was a point to the game, who doubted what a new stronger TAF was all about and what a weakened OE was still capable of.

I personally thank you.

Nice post Mathlord, you might fool some people and even yourself, but you don't fool intelligent people here that can see what's gone on...

[spoiler]

Rudy Pena wrote:

Eärendil wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:Norbe, What about a member of your alliance in a HC position and said member is a GM/Mod on this forum, abusing his powers for personal/alliance gain?

Or how about getting a member permabanned and having a Admin post links in a TAF convo?

How do you explain this?

Excuse me? I have nothing to do with your petty squabble

Mathlord says: I'll get him to call me a faggot some more and get banned again ffffff fffffff
BMMJ13 says: viewtopic.php?p=2414082#p2414082
Lucas D says: woo
beliblisk says: hehe
BMMJ13 says: he called math a faggot
Lucas D says: ill report his posts
BMMJ13 says: you should warn him ::]
Lucas D says: if he gets banned one more time is he perma banned?
BMMJ13 says: hmm guys we are not good at being bias
Mathlord says: yes doc
BMMJ13 says: there are too many witnesses OMG
·$1·#[BoT] Eärendil says: mcp.php?i=reports&mode=report_details&f=68&p=2414082

Do you deny abusing your admin status? Do you deny that the reason huxley was banned was not good enough? Is the term Fairy friend, warnable?

[/spoiler]

Huxley was not banned due to this, he was banned due to a 9th warning accumulated, said warning given by me, not TAF. He broke the rules and was punished.

[spoiler]

Rudy Pena wrote:

Norbe wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:From the last page.

Rudy Pena wrote:Norbe, What about a member of your alliance in a HC position and said member is a GM/Mod on this forum, abusing his powers for personal/alliance gain?

Or how about getting a member permabanned and having a Admin post links in a TAF convo?

How do you explain this?

Okay I genuinely missed this post. Apologies. I can only assume you are referring to the fact that Huxley was banned for breaking the rules of this forum repeatedly. The fact that he was breaking the rules was nothing to do with us. If he had abided by the rules, no ban would have been put in place by the moderators. I believe that is how the forum works.

~Norbe~

So do you deny that TAF reported him for breaking the rules for the term Fairy Friends? And that the Mods/GM/admins are corrupt, warned and banned him for the benefit of TAF?

[/spoiler]

I cannot say for the obvious reasons who reported the posts, but it wasn't TAF. And no admin/GM/mod warned/banned him to benefit TAF.

I modded said posts, and did NOT warn Huxley for spam, as I had already warned him for another post a bit earlier. No mod from TAF was involved in the modding or banning of Huxley, nor was that thread in question responsible for his banning.

TAF is a pretty open book. The thing you notice about TAF convos, as I'm sure Huxley saw in his time there, is we have people from almost everywhere in them. We have friends across the game who we really don't keep secrets from. Over the years, many alliances have tried to infiltrate TAF, especially Omega. The parts of the forum Huxley saw we always expect people to see. The msn convos Huxley was in were nothing other alliances didn't already have access to. The misinformation in personal convos I hoped would get leaked in an amusing way, but oh well, can't win at everything.

Oh and did you really think there was going to be something secretive on our special TAF calculator?

How come no one invites me to a TAF convo .

TAF doesnt like you.

killtacular wrote:How come no one invites me to a TAF convo .

Until recently, I thought you didn't like us

Do I have you on msn kill? I'll be sure to show off our fun times at some point.

Mathlord wrote:

killtacular wrote:How come no one invites me to a TAF convo .

Until recently, I thought you didn't like us

Do I have you on msn kill? I'll be sure to show off our fun times at some point.

I never hate anyone in this game hell I have come to know Guild I even miss mukasa and our good ole forum I 'll show u days.

msn snuggle2me@bellsouth.net

snuggle2me? really?

Mathlord wrote:snuggle2me? really?

yeah gets you close then I got you

no but really stupid story for the msn never changed it

Jedi~Tank wrote:Nice post...euhmmmm, a massive suck up I am not and nobody will kick DDE's ass while I am playing..Thats a guarantee

If there is any truth to that mess of quotes and it is not un-edited then somebody is a fool..if it is edited then somebody is a fool.

So anybody out there that wants a piece of it..I can most certainly oblige whether DDE has 50 members or a mere handful. Guaranteed.

**Filtered** m , you lead we follow

Sun Tzu said: The good fighters of old first put themselves
beyond the possibility of defeat, and then waited for an opportunity
of defeating the enemy.

We knew he was Huxley. We knew Omega will push for a comeback. We knew and we know a great deal of things. One that stands out for me is force displacement within the game. You chose the backstabbing way, sending Huxley to be Strike Force, not using your massive account and your massive alliance to just sit on us, as I've seen all over our war thread. Perhaps it's a way of feeding your ego. Great pride before the fall if all i can say.

And to look upon ourselves a bit... You did nothing. We're still here, strong and willing. Not a dent in the alliance. It would seem you have a taste for drama and futility.

drama and futility