[™§£KHM£†] (now named [Z£R0])
- Robe
- Aussie Icon
- Posts: 3093
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:59 pm
- Alliance: The Legion
- Race: Vampyre
- ID: 14876
- Location: Down Under
-
Honours and Awards
Few conflict issues can be solved in forum.
There is no point speculating who did what to whom, its just conjecture.
I will speak to both parties personally (and would have done so sooner if I had not been away).
As stated before there has been no cheating so this topic should now been closed.
Thanks for expressing your concerns.
There is no point speculating who did what to whom, its just conjecture.
I will speak to both parties personally (and would have done so sooner if I had not been away).
As stated before there has been no cheating so this topic should now been closed.
Thanks for expressing your concerns.
-
gordash
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:04 pm
well by the looks of the thing - no1 set out to scam ne1, and massari has been banned - im might be wrong but i very much doubt it - and i really doubt forum would like you to be given 1 or 2 mil UU whether or not you got scammed. you used the GIVE function, maybe you should be more careful about the exact details of the deal before you GIVE anything
User ID: 15612
-
agapooka
- Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
- ID: 0
-
Honours and Awards
Well, ZERO is a good guy. He just held my ascension resources
. And yes, he DID give them back.
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!
A Spider: 1 stamp!
-
12agnar0k
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2878
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:08 pm
- ID: 0
-
agapooka
- Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
- ID: 0
-
Honours and Awards
I agree. I've mentionned that a couple of times. It's bound to be ignored unless you put it in big bold capital letters like I'm gonna do.
THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT A CHEATER, IT IS ACTUALLY INNITIATED BY ONE; HENCE, IT IS IN THE WRONG SECTION, AS IT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE TOPIC STARTER.
Maybe now people will notice.
THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT A CHEATER, IT IS ACTUALLY INNITIATED BY ONE; HENCE, IT IS IN THE WRONG SECTION, AS IT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE TOPIC STARTER.
Maybe now people will notice.
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!
A Spider: 1 stamp!
-
lawrencekill
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 6:27 pm
Agapooka wrote:I agree. I've mentionned that a couple of times. It's bound to be ignored unless you put it in big bold capital letters like I'm gonna do.
THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT A CHEATER, IT IS ACTUALLY INNITIATED BY ONE; HENCE, IT IS IN THE WRONG SECTION, AS IT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE TOPIC STARTER.
Maybe now people will notice.
Man, why doesn't anyone say this earlier. I thought it really was about a cheat.
Stupid people who don't read...
That's my feedback thread, I'm just too lazy to fix the link.
My Trade Feedback Thread
Tradeback finally fixed thanks to wolf loves lots'n lots.
My Trade Feedback Thread
Tradeback finally fixed thanks to wolf loves lots'n lots.
-
Kerrus Magrus
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:10 am
- ID: 0
nah, sek's a great person. have done several wonderful trades with him. while massari's always sounded nice over chat, i can;t see him leaving something as big as 1000$ till now. regardless of what the other person said. if that had been be, i woulda found their IP and gone there to find out where the money was.
There are some things in life money can't buy. For everything else, there's superior firepower.
-
agapooka
- Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
- ID: 0
-
Honours and Awards
lawrencekill wrote:Agapooka wrote:I agree. I've mentionned that a couple of times. It's bound to be ignored unless you put it in big bold capital letters like I'm gonna do.
THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT A CHEATER, IT IS ACTUALLY INNITIATED BY ONE; HENCE, IT IS IN THE WRONG SECTION, AS IT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE TOPIC STARTER.
Maybe now people will notice.
Man, why doesn't anyone say this earlier. I thought it really was about a cheat.
Stupid people who don't read...
It's been said before, just not in big bold capital letters.
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!
A Spider: 1 stamp!

