Page 6 of 10

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:15 am
by law7441
small is someone with 1M or less

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:16 am
by Hells__Angel
Im having fun.

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:25 am
by Cole
I've fun, only 4+mil here :)

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:28 am
by V|per
law7441 wrote:small is someone with 1M or less


Ohh, well, I still consider myself small when facing 50mil+ armies. :o

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:46 am
by Thufir_Hawat
In all honesty anyone with less than 1mil units after a couple months or less of playing is a either inactive or unwilling to learn how to play.

If they want to learn then many of us are willing to help them move forward. I always am willing to help those willing to help themselfs. That means giving them targets and ATs not UU. Teaching them how to fish...

So yes anyone with a brand new account probably is not having fun and do not belong in the war yet. If they are then I bet they will learn a lot from the experience.

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:45 pm
by Thufir_Hawat
law7441 wrote:small is someone with 1M or less


Well it seems not even a player with over 34M army is immune from having fun.

law7441 [ THE DARK DOMINIUM ]
Living God of a DESCENDED AJNA

I would like to Congratulate those in TF that did it.

And, Law at his nice attempt to save it today.

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:00 pm
by law7441
Thufir_Hawat wrote:
law7441 wrote:small is someone with 1M or less


Well it seems not even a player with over 34M army is immune from having fun.

law7441 [ THE DARK DOMINIUM ]
Living God of a DESCENDED AJNA

I would like to Congratulate those in TF that did it.

And, Law at his nice attempt to save it today.


well you have to try or you never get anyway

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:06 pm
by Almost38
Name: REK [ THE DARK DOMINIUM ]
Living God of a DESCENDED ORI
Commander: None

dont forget him

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:11 pm
by law7441
that was while ago now keep up lol

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:19 pm
by [SGC_ReplicĂ…tors]
law7441 wrote:small is someone with 1M or less



thats not what etl says.....but then again im not too concerned what anybodies definition of a noob is

Re: The official "thoughts on the CoP CIA war" thr

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:30 pm
by Alabrax
Tauriman77 wrote:I myself think the war will not acomplish much, if CoP wins they will still have a hold on SGW and the only thing CIA will have acomplished is losing more power making CoP's grip on SGW even stronger. and if CIA wins i personally think they would turn into the next CoP, i mean really they would have control over all of SGW and not take the opportunity? i think the simplest way to settle the war would be for CIA and CoP to disband the CoP and CIA and just be indavidule alliances, of coures this probably will never happen.



Well I do not agree that CIA would become the next COP, I would not stand for that personally... and I would join what ever group was formed to topple CIA. I think many other leaders in CIA feel the same way.

As for both mega alliances disbanding and all just being individual alliances... I would totally agree with that and in fact that would be a wonderful outcome in my book.

Honestly however I dont think we will see this war end... and I am prefectly ok with that also.

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:46 pm
by Mattwell
Why does CoP keep insisting that CiA will become just liek them after the war. I don't know how many times its been said(but its a lot), CIA has only been formed to bring down CoP, and has no plans to continue after that goal has been met. To answer my own question, I guess CoP is trying to score points by argueing a point based on something we've already proven false. Its like saying what I'd do if I had a million dollars. I don't have a million dollars so it doesn't matter what I'd do with it.

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:48 pm
by Alabrax
J.S. wrote:If he doesn't want to join respect his wishes.. I would rather shoot the guy who wanted me to join a war I didn't want to fight in then shoot a guy who I didn't want to kill

Thats why in Full Metal Jacket when the sargent gets it I laugh everytime thinking about it :twisted:


I thought I would throw a quote from 'The Prince' by Nicolo Machiavelli at this...

Thus it will always happen that he who is not your friend will demand your neutrality, whilst he who is your friend will entreat you to declare yourself with arms. And irresolute princes, to avoid present dangers, generally follow the neutral path, and are generally ruined.

Re: The official "thoughts on the CoP CIA war" thr

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:49 pm
by bamse
Alabrax wrote:Well I do not agree that CIA would become the next COP, I would not stand for that personally... and I would join what ever group was formed to topple CIA. I think many other leaders in CIA feel the same way.

As for both mega alliances disbanding and all just being individual alliances... I would totally agree with that and in fact that would be a wonderful outcome in my book.

Honestly however I dont think we will see this war end... and I am prefectly ok with that also.


I agree with Alabrax 100%

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:58 pm
by Alabrax
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:You know what makes me laugh..it's all these alliances coming on here boasting about their efforts during the war, when the truth of the matter is that without Legion, they did frack all!


And your point is? Are you saying that if we can not do it alone then we should just be quiet? That we should all stand on our own?

Ok, I am game, we will all stand on our own. You first.