StarGateWars Forums

Seker wrote:The limiting turns through the ingame market wont solve anything. For example with the current rates you can only get 3240 turns by using your market turns and with you generating 3 turns a turn it increases your total weekly possible turns to 4248. This is around 283, 15 turn attacks each week. The problem that I will go with you on limiting the market is the black market. But I do not think the limiting of all aspects of the market is a good idea. By canceling out the Black market or limiting it you will severely limit the turns by limiting all the aspect you will further choke the life out of the game. I also have a problem with limiting the turns since the people that have been playing for awhile were able to use the market to get buy these turns which you are securing their benefit by limiting them now since they have already raiding or stolen naq with these turns. So the only fair thing to do if you limit the amount of turns is to do a massive plague to whole server to remove that bonus in my opinion. I have sure that the admin team has the stats for each account of how many turns each person has bought and can plague each account in regard to how many turns were bought. Now if they do this then they should also refund these people with cash since they bought them with real money.

Teal'auc wrote:It's matter of opinion mate... I personally prefer fun in this game rather than waiting for AT's. Strategy would be nice, but not at the cost of fun imho...Of course I remember when turns were limited and I said it on many ocassions that I like it the way it is now better. It's always about what people prefer/want, and our opinions differ.



Teal'auc

TacticalCommander wrote:I agree it would be better and was a little better before limitless AT's came out, but now, I don't think its fair to restrict new player growth into big players when alot of other people before them had an unlimited supply of AT to use to raid. With restricted AT's, sure farms/raids would become better per 15 turn attack, but not enough.

Right now, my major source of growth is through using large Quantities of AT, without that, will set me back by months....well actually it might balance out depending on how much UU prices rise and how much I can sell.

Honestly, building a large army size for income just sounds boring, yep trained more miners, yep generating naq....I like the thrill of farming and not knowing if today I'll get 20bil hit or 100bil, or find a raid with 100k UU, adds excitement for me, certainly more than sold 2k AT today for 100bil naq.

TC

TacticalCommander wrote:Personally, I'm still not happy with all the recent updates is what I believe is killing SGW. All I've seen for months on end are tweaks, admitly some like Purgatory and Ascension are very BIG game changing tweaks, but none the less tweaks. Lifer Suicide? thats not what I'm talking about.

I'm talking about the old days when Updates where unique techs were first introduced, or MotherShips. I want those kind of updates again, the creative ones that changed the game just enough to keep it fun an interesting.

Sure updates like that only benefit the big at first, but look at MS, 2 years it was just a something the big could afford, going to something that CO's would buy for their officers, and now doesn't matter how big you are, one 15 turn attack will get you 3 or 4 times the amount to buy a MS.

Its why I like my modified ZPM ajusted idea
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=81208&p=1094914#p1094914
Help give something for the game to work towards again, besides building a large army size.

i suppose its the loss of updates like these and people became more concerned with building a large army size that encourage the raid and limitless AT in the first place....

TC

Munchy wrote:I see the topic of getting rid of artificially produced turns on the market is here again. The best topic(in my opinion) upon which this has been discussed is here viewtopic.php?f=13&t=53717&st=0&sk=t&sd=a A few things have changed since then, but not much. My opinion is the same now as it was then.

Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Well, accusing Jason of making the game just solely for $$ is harsh... it's not the way what Jason wants.



Teal'auc

Semper wrote:Jason is human the last I knew... $$ may not be the SOLE goal, but its gotta be the main goal, otherwise its bad business.

Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:

Semper wrote:Jason is human the last I knew... $$ may not be the SOLE goal, but its gotta be the main goal, otherwise its bad business.

Is it so hard for nowadays people to accept that he does the game for free and for fun of many others, which is also his main goal? Don't you think Jason could do much more money by simply programming something else, without having hundreds of people complaining about it all the time?

Come on, mate.



Teal'auc