StarGateWars Forums

Semper wrote:

Apophis The Great wrote:

Semper wrote:@ Jim. Lighten up jim... it was an example and not meant in offence.. well.. if you took it in offence it's a bonus because it's amusing you did so.. but it wasn't meant that way.

I didn't really take it as an offense, but there are more "obvious" examples to use about me. Spamming general section, constant arguing, formerly forum multi-ing...those are more "famous" negative points of mine than the one you listed. Not to mention I still argue and spam general section, while the one you keep refering about me, is former stuff.

Emo one year emo forever I guess..

hmmm.... now.. let me say this slowly. Many of the truth's we cling to depend greatly on our own points of view. To me... the one I listed was the most obvious.. none of the above. Not the multies.. certainly not the arguing or spamming.

Semper wrote:Lol... sorry man called Jim.. I am waiting for these 'exciting' titles.. so far you've given me a list that's pretty much no more exciting than anything I have given.. other than the fact it incorporates more ridiculous titles that are here there and everywhere... forum traveller to space explorer..to fleet builder...to planet explorer and world conqueror back to solar master and then system controller. System controller and solar master? Half of these things would require one or the other as prerequisites before they continue.. yet at the same time.. one cannot forget the brainless abandonment of it being forum related..until of course you equate conquering the known galaxy to being a forum god...

By this reckoning let's have a set of forum ranks.. that go from being ranked as some species of deep sea fish to being ranked as some celestial body and then a forum poster!
Sticking a forum related title at either end and then putting any old chimpanzee poo'ed mound in the middle is just as out there as using a list of ships.

Forum Newbie
Shrimp
Shore side crustacean
Land Mammal
Terran Master
Air explorer
Planet Dominator
Moon Owner
planet
forum master



@ Jim. Lighten up jim... it was an example and not meant in offence.. well.. if you took it in offence it's a bonus because it's amusing you did so.. but it wasn't meant that way.

@ Jack. I removed most of the USAF ranks on purpose.. because it's meant to be more light-hearted and focused on SG. Half those ranks never had any relevance in the SG universe and are not necessary. On top of that... where as the primary cast did use USAF ranks we have seen examples of British, Canadian and Russian ranks used so I wanted to make sure most of the ranks used were also incorporated into their armed forces.

I still think either one of the more bland, neutral list's.. or the SG focused USAF ranks will be good, if not them.. then the ascension titles...

Man Called Jim wrote: take Lore for example... seen half an episode i believe

Snipes wrote:

Zeratul wrote:ok, list has been altered somewhat now... they're not quite as race-specific now...

but it aint finished yet...

FTF Drive (faster than forum drive)

Zeratul wrote:thats because we've not figured out replacements for all titles yet...

we started with those titles that had the most users on them...

suggestions are welcome for stargatey titles...

Zeratul wrote:we have yet to see any suggestions that arent forcibly linked to a single race, or not at all stargate-themed...

how do you think an replicator player would react to the title system lord, or I.O.A member?

we know how people have reacted to the less-thought-out titles so far ("order of the ori" and such...), so it wouldnt work well with those... same can be said for military titles... an system lord would hate any air force rank...