StarGateWars Forums

Leg Apophis wrote::smt015 ,

& @ "the likes of you" part.

I suppose the "likes of you" as you define me, is composed from the ones agreeing with current state of things like me (civil union only), to the ones in favour of killing all homosexuals in world (whoever they are)...in other words, all those who don't agree with you, nomatter whether they are in favour of extermination, or, keeping the current system like I think (civil union). (I don't have a word in mind to describe this, so I will just use this smiley: )

The reality of "supertolerance-champions" being totally UNtolerant to ANY disagreeing level to their stance, cannot be more obvious than here.
Ah well, we are all fascist racist discriminating homophobic monsters, when we don't agree with the almighty rational unique position from "supertolerance champions" (here mariage for homosexuals being legal), aren't we?

And you dare to say I don't have rational arguements?

Mister Sandman wrote:

Leg Apophis wrote:

Mister Sandman wrote:Politically: No

Why?: Because homosexuals are gay.

Not only homosexuals are gay...otherwise it would be a sad world, if only gays were gay. Would mean us straight people would be sad (or unhappy or whatever).

Leg Apophis wrote:

Mister Sandman wrote:*thinks people should see a play on words*

Well, many straight people are gay and many gays aren't gay.

You still dont get it.

Edit: On a serious note

Marriage is legally defined as union between a man and a woman.
I see no reason to change the law for the minority. It is a fair law.

Actually marriage is a religious definition always was and always has been in which the laws are structured by opinion and politics and however you want it to be this is an old law instituted by church law.

Laws change, but religions don't thus it is actually prejudice because it segments people from marriage from birth because they are born this way thus would be illegal.

Are you born gay? No.
Do people have a higher chances to become gay than others? Yes.
Does the environment have something to do with it? Yes.
Is it ultimately your choice to be gay or straight in the end? Yes.

Notify me when the murder becomes legalised. Laws, change, yes, but not all laws.

[KMA]Avenger wrote:lol to this thread is all i can say....well, thats not entirely true...


we had this convo before and nothing was resolved then and nothing will be resolved now because we all have differing opinions, some base those on modern ethical standing, meaning, we are in the modern world and should let people be what they want to be.
while others (including myself) see homosexuality as being indecent based on more traditional values...

given the state of the modern world and peoples modern ethical standing (or lack of any ethical standing as is evident of peoples lack of respect in these times we live), i say there is NOTHING good about homosexuality and it should be outlawed. anyone found to be engaging in homosexual behaviour should be castrated and imprisoned...would there be any homosexuals left after a few are caught? i would think the % would drop over night!


yes, i admit freely i have extremist views, but i am also a farther or 3 sons and i'll be damned in hell for all eternity before i accept they are homosexual, much less i let any of my sons end up a homo!


this should be locked!

Leg Apophis wrote:
And Avenger that's way too far tsk tsk.

[KMA]Avenger wrote:

Leg Apophis wrote:
And Avenger that's way too far tsk tsk.

is it to far Jim?

our society is setup from its very beginnings to be heterosexual. yes some ancient civilisations practised homosexuality, but its not natural...if it was then homos would be able to procreate. since they cant procreate, that is evidence enough for me that what they do is WRONG in every sense of the word and should be outlawed and this topic locked!

Are you born gay? No.
Do people have a higher chances to become gay than others? Yes.
Does the environment have something to do with it? Yes.
Is it ultimately your choice to be gay or straight in the end? Yes.

There is evidence with twin studies the same as mental illness that some people are born gay.

Notify me when the murder becomes legalised. Laws, change, yes, but not all laws.

mm happens how is it illegal when many murders have acquittals if that don't legalize it what more proof do you want law is about how you term it.

eg stealing look at the stock market, banking, tax and interest rates its legalized stealing its just how you term it.

Not that I dont respect soldiers I do but according to the law its legalized murder just as long as its not in your country its ok.

The law is not about belief its about the commonality of a society and their accepted norms. That's the law..

As I have always said why cant there be a gay word for marriage therefore they get the rights and marriage definition can be locked into its belief structure.

There main problem with marriage is that it entitles certain rights to the law that's the problem they become marginalized and restricted...either way Mister Sandman seeing through another perspective may give you a different opinion and remember in the bible its says "thou shalt not judge". I prefer to learn and understand rather than keep to the same argument.

Leg Apophis wrote:Something that is beyond me is:
How could homosexual men not be attracted by women?
How could lesbians not be attracted by men?

Guess we will never know why lol

Mister Sandman wrote:

Are you born gay? No.
Do people have a higher chances to become gay than others? Yes.
Does the environment have something to do with it? Yes.
Is it ultimately your choice to be gay or straight in the end? Yes.

There is evidence with twin studies the same as mental illness that some people are born gay.

Unless you are calling being gay as an mental illness then they arnt. Proof: The 'gay' gene has been falsified by the same scientist who 'discovered' it. He stated there is no link in being homosexual and genes.

Notify me when the murder becomes legalised. Laws, change, yes, but not all laws.

mm happens how is it illegal when many murders have acquittals if that don't legalize it what more proof do you want law is about how you term it.

eg stealing look at the stock market, banking, tax and interest rates its legalized stealing its just how you term it.

Not that I dont respect soldiers I do but according to the law its legalized murder just as long as its not in your country its ok.

The law is not about belief its about the commonality of a society and their accepted norms. That's the law..

You misinterpret, i was just giving an example of a law, which, wouldn't change in the future or near future or at least any rational country would not legalise murder.

The needs of many outweigh the few, a few want murder legalised.

War is war. There is no real law when in combat. It is kill or be killed. Slight difference in terms of words.

As I have always said why cant there be a gay word for marriage therefore they get the rights and marriage definition can be locked into its belief structure.

There main problem with marriage is that it entitles certain rights to the law that's the problem they become marginalized and restricted...either way Mister Sandman seeing through another perspective may give you a different opinion and remember in the bible its says "thou shalt not judge". I prefer to learn and understand rather than keep to the same argument.

"Homosexual acts are an abomination."

And im not judging them for being homosexual, I am merely stating the definition, and what others think. ]

Leg Apophis wrote:Something that is beyond me is:
How could homosexual men not be attracted by women?
How could lesbians not be attracted by men?

Guess we will never know why lol

Environment; Predisposition; ect

I take it unless its religion approved you wont accept it and science came up with the notice yes nature vs nurture are a combined affect and you forgot the original premise that was assessed that gay was a mental illness and as I have stated you have not definable proof that it is not genetic and claiming its an abomination is a judgment you are claiming superiority no less than KMA but with less severity. This is the very reason why they seek marriage, validation in the courts for funeral rights ect, ect.

I will save any other retort, but do you know any gay or lesbians?

While I do not agree with gay marriage its a definition point not a judgment point or the bible. I came to my opinion through research and going out in the world and facing my pre-conceptions. Simple definition yes, but as I say give em another term to use for the same rights.