Page 7 of 12

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:12 am
by BMMJ13
RoKeT wrote:
~Ancient~ wrote:Why when your in a war would you mass nutural like me?? very bad form [-(


Obviously you were massed, because you could be, does no one get what S.O.A. stands for... Okay here it is ready, we are the "new" "bad guys" why, because this game needs it, if you have a D, and low Cov, i'm gonna take it, if you have a Cov, with a **Filtered** D I'm gonna take it.... Why, because it's a GAME woohoo!!! and I miss "FUALL" Methods, I miss the massing for watever, I miss the whole you piss me off on forums, I'm gonna mass you, not this whole "omg he is new, omg why, omg bringing forums ingame"... The simple answer to all of those is... Yes... Yes we are... Yes we are massing who and when we want... Yes... Yes we will mass you, No... No you are not safe... No it does not matter... Why? because we can :)

Difference between war mongers and **Filtered** are war mongers don't keep naps, because that would go against the very nature of their idea, while **Filtered** nap other **Filtered** and then just pick on those who are weak to look good. The question is, are SoA going to be just another "FUALL" method **Filtered** and pick on those who are weaker, or you going to actually fight against those who can fight back?

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:17 am
by [SlayerS_fith]
SOA stadn for many things.
there is no question.

toput it simple the game is seen as mass be massed.
we in SOA accept this.
and ofcourse we will challenge those who will fight back.
and yes we will aid people grow and get newbies into the game.
im helping 5 new guys atm in various alliances and some lonewolf.
no idea who they are.
2 i got accounts for because there current accounts sucked and wherent even ascended.


myself n Ryu beleive the game needs a shake from having too much power 1 sided.
but saying saying this we wont be napping with any1 unless it suits us :)

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:18 am
by [SlayerS_fith]
~Ancient~ wrote:Why when your in a war would you mass nutural like me?? very bad form [-(


update your sig mr unknown :P


also keep hitting us war!
come on guise!

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:37 am
by Z E R O
Too much talky talky.

SOA = SOA. We do what we want and we don't care what you think ^_^.

End of story really.

Anyone from WAR got any stats to post? CR you musta killed a few supers on your little "bombing runs". I saw one or two more of ya in our logs testing the waters.. Any more gonna come play?

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:45 am
by Tek
[SlayerS_fith] wrote:SOA stadn for many things.
there is no question.

toput it simple the game is seen as mass be massed.
we in SOA accept this.
and ofcourse we will challenge those who will fight back.
and yes we will aid people grow and get newbies into the game.
im helping 5 new guys atm in various alliances and some lonewolf.
no idea who they are.
2 i got accounts for because there current accounts sucked and wherent even ascended.


myself n Ryu beleive the game needs a shake from having too much power 1 sided.
but saying saying this we wont be napping with any1 unless it suits us :)


Dont let Roket do your mandate, yours looks much prettifuller.

At some point, at some time, push will come to shove and everyone will see exactly what SOA is about. And i hope you fellas dont disapoint. Geddem SOA.

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:47 am
by ~Ancient~
Well if you think 30trill covert is low and 30trill deff then your not worth your weight in tic tacs................i had no warning, basically some one had a 70trill attack and had to waste it, didnt see any big boys in alliances get hit who were much lower ranked with higher defs and covert, but hey if u wanna hit people who (at the moment) dont have the time to play war games and on there own......bad form [-X

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:54 am
by [SlayerS_fith]
~Ancient~ wrote:Well if you think 30trill covert is low and 30trill deff then your not worth your weight in tic tacs................i had no warning, basically some one had a 70trill attack and had to waste it, didnt see any big boys in alliances get hit who were much lower ranked with higher defs and covert, but hey if u wanna hit people who (at the moment) dont have the time to play war games and on there own......bad form [-X



you knows i wuv you man :)
and you know what we discussed :)
have at it.

anyways
come on war
heard there WAS a 1t strikes ms in there lol.
;)

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 10:04 am
by ~Ancient~
Well if i can find the time to EDUCATE then i will, but sadly very busy at the mo......but when the time suits ME i'll be in the logs :-D

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 10:22 am
by Z E R O
~Ancient~ wrote:Well if i can find the time to EDUCATE then i will, but sadly very busy at the mo......but when the time suits ME i'll be in the logs :-D


<3 Yay.

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 10:49 am
by RoKeT
~Ancient~ wrote:Well if i can find the time to EDUCATE then i will, but sadly very busy at the mo......but when the time suits ME i'll be in the logs :-D

Tis how it should be as it's a game and should be played that way :)

Tek wrote:Dont let Roket do your mandate, yours looks much prettifuller.

Oh :( I tried lol

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:03 pm
by harchester
~Ancient~ wrote:Well if i can find the time to EDUCATE then i will, but sadly very busy at the mo......but when the time suits ME i'll be in the logs :-D


i hope that word i enlarged there means what i think it does

Image

Class in session yet Massey ? :-D

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:13 pm
by Scar Face
That word only triggers a line almost everyone like: WANNA GET SAT ON? :-D

GL war, SOA got some powah!

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:34 pm
by ~Ancient~
Harchester my old buddy i belive these boys may want to bring back what has been the sleeping giant!!! EDUCATION :smt047 But am busy at the mo....but soon REAL soon

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 3:12 am
by Ryuujin Jakka
Lol you guys are funny. ,And harch ur not 1 to talk about any1u screwed a guy over to real... but yeah , gladly Massey would be an honour to war you yet again :) see how it rolls , war nice goin guys more attacks every day , looking good :)

And Massey when u get back if you plan to sit on me , sit verry high and if u plan to really sit on me eat some pies cause id rater you go full out than half sit on me but this isn'tserver war "I'll sit on u" "person gets scared cause of no resources and gives up no no I'll return the favour :)

Re: ~S.O.A~ Vs WAR

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:20 am
by RoKeT
Ah.... ME Stopped going up :( no more attacks from you guys, I swear one massing on me, gives me 100times the ME From a sabbing, massing, and Acing from me gives me lol

So far for stats...*yes they are low :(*

Attack Mercs Killed (30) 8,355,245
Defence Mercs Killed (10) 4,404,233
Attack Soldiers Killed(60) 0
Defence Soldiers Killed(20) 87,907
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 26,952,578
Defence Super Soldiers Killed(100) 22,261,190
Spies Killed(50) 14,509,950
Spy Killers Killed(50) 2,001,957
Mothership Weapons Destroyed(300) 148,911
Mothership Shields Destroyed(300) 192,785
Mothership Fleets Destroyed(200) 10,813
Planet Defences Destroyed(300) 7,081
Planets Taken(5000) 1
Naquadah Stolen(0.0001) 2,894,714,743,184
Untrained Kidnapped(50) 3,766,392
Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att)(0.0001) 925,206,166,433
Attack Turns Used(1) 4,653

TOTAL WAR EXPERIENCE POINTS 12,018,541,997

Your Failures
Attacking Mercenaries Lost 7,446,680
Defending Mercenaries Lost 981,711
Away Team Lost 23,204
Home Guard Lost 0
Super Soldier Lost 6,995,385
Super Guards Lost 13,231,912
Covert Ops Lost 2,817,290
CounterIntelligence Agents Lost 116
Mothership Weapons Lost 318,527
Mothership Shields Lost 270,756
Mothership Fleets Lost 768
Planet Defences Lost 0
Planets Lost 0
Naquadah Lost 115,198,007,445
Untrained Lost 0
Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att on You) 0
Attack Turns Used Against You 2,302
Plus/Minus 0