Page 7 of 8
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 5:20 pm
by Noobert
When I was 14, I was wishing a hot 24 year old woman would..well that's a different story.

I can understand both points of view as to how this could be appropriate and inappropriate. A joke is a joke for a reason, however, it is largely inappropriate due to the age of the individual.
For this action, I will scold Juliette severely. BAD JULIETTE, BAD.

Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 5:23 pm
by jedi~tank
Was this done of this forum or msn?
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 5:25 pm
by The Doctor
Jedi~Tank wrote:Was this done of this forum or msn?
Forum
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:36 pm
by Clarkey
You see I disagree with having that image on the forums. Why post an image of a bear widely known as Pedo Bear? What is funny about it? It is just sick.
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:48 pm
by noone
Why dont we all drop it and close this topic and hide it in some deep corner of the forum or remove it
enough been said, points been made clear ....
I'm taking my leave of it
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:44 am
by ƒëmmë ƒatalë
now we have mod/GM posting references to opium and smoking in the spam temple hardly pg13 is it?
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:45 am
by jedi~tank
ƒëmmë ƒatalë wrote:now we have mod/GM posting references to opium and smoking in the spam temple hardly pg13 is it?
Its absurd.
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:47 am
by Clarkey
ƒëmmë ƒatalë wrote:now we have mod/GM posting references to opium and smoking in the spam temple hardly pg13 is it?
Is this forum actually PG-13????
Also femme, you cannot compare smoking to paedophilia. Smoking is hardly a subject that should be removed from the forums. Jesus, I did a poo today, is that wrong of me to say?
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:48 am
by Juliette
ƒëmmë ƒatalë wrote:now we have mod/GM posting references to opium and smoking in the spam temple hardly pg13 is it?
At least provide links instead of making us have to search for the damned posts.
Come off that high horse and read what the Boss said.
But then, what would one expect.. see you when I get back.
@Clarkey: Next time you have the **Filtered** balls to call me a paedophile, I will have you made to regret it. Deeply.
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:49 am
by stuff of legends
Clarkey wrote:ƒëmmë ƒatalë wrote:now we have mod/GM posting references to opium and smoking in the spam temple hardly pg13 is it?
Is this forum actually PG-13????
So says supreme overlord Admin Jason, if not, then why do we have all these rules
![[017.gif] :smt017](./images/smilies/017.gif)
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:00 am
by ƒëmmë ƒatalë
Juliette you are an adult, if you wish to make such jokes do it with other adults not to minors.
a child should not be receiving comments like those from an adult. And especially not by someone employed to control the content of the forum. Period.
@ Clarkey .. so I had sex today ..should I go post about it too? The reference was to Opium an illegal substance and yes I reported said posts.
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:03 am
by Zeratul
How many times do we have to tell ya, PG-13 isn't the way this forum is. It was only that way for a week. Tops.
"family friendly", yes. "PG-13", no.
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:08 am
by Juliette
ƒëmmë ƒatalë wrote:Juliette you are an adult, if you wish to make such jokes do it with other adults not to minors.

We both know what
you did not more than a week ago, and how much worse that is than joking with someone who
says they are 14. Hell, it says '65' in the 'Age' field on my profile page. Does that make me 65? Do you know whether I really am 25? Do you know whether Andy isn't a 40 year old guy who likes to pretend he's 14?
You are a lost cause, 'Femme'. I want nothing to do with you, so please, don't slander me by using my name.
Good day.
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:11 am
by Clarkey
Juliette wrote:ƒëmmë ƒatalë wrote:now we have mod/GM posting references to opium and smoking in the spam temple hardly pg13 is it?
At least provide links instead of making us have to search for the damned posts.
Come off that high horse and read what the Boss said.
But then, what would one expect.. see you when I get back.
@Clarkey: Next time you have the **Filtered** balls to call me a paedophile, I will have you made to regret it. Deeply.
Me regret it? You can't do anything to me sitting behind your computer screen.
For the record as i've said to you already I did not call you or insinutate you were a paedophile. That's the problem with the internet, things can get read out of context. So get of your high horse, admit that you dug your own hole and deal with it.
I never called you a paedophile. End of.
Re: appropriateness
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:14 am
by [BoT] Jason
ƒëmmë ƒatalë wrote:now we have mod/GM posting references to opium and smoking in the spam temple hardly pg13 is it?
Z0mg look wikipedia must be warned
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpiumGet off your high horse, drug education is done from the age of 11 so please dont think kids these days will be offended