Page 7 of 16

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:15 pm
by Guild
SuperSaiyan wrote:
~Phoenix~ wrote:
SuperSaiyan wrote:We're not arguing that we don't have naq out that is profitable, who doesn't?
Our point is, the moment all this started the frequency you guys have been hitting has increased :s


Mere co-insidence. Things like the planet-theft may have indeed come to our attention because of all this stuff-however it wasn't done as an attack on HVE but just a good hit on a good planet. That is all there is.


yeah coincidence both you and slayer took two planets from empy the same day this vendetta is declared, days after the vendetta with guild is mutually postponed?


so you dont think that your guys sparkin up and declaring vendettas didnt draw the attention of our guys :S course it did and when you see an undefended say 100k up or 130 bil cov planet yyou take it ...

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:16 pm
by Ashu
Guild wrote:
SuperSaiyan wrote:
~Phoenix~ wrote:
SuperSaiyan wrote:We're not arguing that we don't have naq out that is profitable, who doesn't?
Our point is, the moment all this started the frequency you guys have been hitting has increased :s


Mere co-insidence. Things like the planet-theft may have indeed come to our attention because of all this stuff-however it wasn't done as an attack on HVE but just a good hit on a good planet. That is all there is.


yeah coincidence both you and slayer took two planets from empy the same day this vendetta is declared, days after the vendetta with guild is mutually postponed?


so you dont think that your guys sparkin up and declaring vendettas didnt draw the attention of our guys :S course it did and when you see an undefended say 100k up or 130 bil cov planet yyou take it ...


Not when you see the vendetta thread against someone from your alliance. Honour, i believe they call it...

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:17 pm
by ~Phoenix~
Malx wrote:Not when you see the vendetta thread against someone from your alliance. Honour, i believe they call it...


So we are not allowed perfectly good hits on players completely not involved in any vendettas.. because someone from their alliance and someone from ours are? That offers full alliance protection does it?

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:17 pm
by Guild
Malx wrote:
Guild wrote:
SuperSaiyan wrote:
~Phoenix~ wrote:
SuperSaiyan wrote:We're not arguing that we don't have naq out that is profitable, who doesn't?
Our point is, the moment all this started the frequency you guys have been hitting has increased :s


Mere co-insidence. Things like the planet-theft may have indeed come to our attention because of all this stuff-however it wasn't done as an attack on HVE but just a good hit on a good planet. That is all there is.


yeah coincidence both you and slayer took two planets from empy the same day this vendetta is declared, days after the vendetta with guild is mutually postponed?


so you dont think that your guys sparkin up and declaring vendettas didnt draw the attention of our guys :S course it did and when you see an undefended say 100k up or 130 bil cov planet yyou take it ...


Not when you see the vendetta thread against someone from your alliance. Honour, i believe they call it...


my bad i thought the vendetta was involving tetris ... my mistake

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:22 pm
by Rudy Peña
AG/Gen should stop being lil fraks and let tzikitalkalotforumfighter fight ingame and not on forum. Seems to me that AG/Gen is nothing but forum fighters.....expect Cole, cause hes cool and nice.

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:24 pm
by Ashu
If player A vendetta's player B and player B's alliance is in knowledge of this yet still attacks player A's alliance then they are cowardly dishonoring the vendetta. Unless someone from player A's alliance or himself has 100T out, in which case i would farm myself if it was the case, YOU DO NOT TOUCH THEM if you demand and wish to receive respect.

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:25 pm
by ~Phoenix~
Malx wrote:If player A vendetta's player B and player B's alliance is in knowledge of this yet still attacks player A's alliance then they are cowardly dishonoring the vendetta. Unless someone from player A's alliance or himself has 100T out, in which case i would farm myself if it was the case, YOU DO NOT TOUCH THEM if you demand and wish to receive respect.


Never heard that one before. You should probably specify that in a vendetta request. Wishful thinking =/= reality.

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:26 pm
by Guild
Malx wrote:If player A vendetta's player B and player B's alliance is in knowledge of this yet still attacks player A's alliance then they are cowardly dishonoring the vendetta. Unless someone from player A's alliance or himself has 100T out, in which case i would farm myself if it was the case, YOU DO NOT TOUCH THEM if you demand and wish to receive respect.


a temp nap... pfft roll on we hav enough of them ingame thanks

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:29 pm
by Ashu
It's not something to specify. If i were to declare a vendetta then one of my alliance mate took a planet and over-farmed you, what would you believe? It's not a temp nap, you just let them destroy each other. It's not that hard to look away from an alliance when there are thousand of players that generate even more naq and have even better planets.

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:34 pm
by ~Phoenix~
Malx wrote:It's not something to specify. If i were to declare a vendetta then one of my alliance mate took a planet and over-farmed you, what would you believe? It's not a temp nap, you just let them destroy each other. It's not that hard to look away from an alliance when there are thousand of players that generate even more naq and have even better planets.


It's much easier when you actually tell someone that's how you want it to go down. Even if those conditions are not accepted none of us would ever have assumed this without it being mentioned.

I personally would not be happy with that whatsoever because, like I've said, I have not targeted HVE at all regarding any vendettas. In fact I have only learn't about it all in the past hour or two and every hit I have made has been very profittable.


So tell me what exactly is wanted by HVE?

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:38 pm
by SHIZZZO
would you guys shut up and let the two play? (I am bored :-D)

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:40 pm
by Melian
aye aye captin!

:-#

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:43 pm
by Loki™
Image

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:49 pm
by Rudy Peña
:-$ :-$ :-$ :-$ :-" :-" :-" :-" :smt047 :smt047 :smt047 8-[ 8-[ 8-[

Re: ~Tziki~ vs Tetrismonkey

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:56 pm
by Lithium
Rudy Pena wrote:Image :-$ :-$ :-$ :-$ :-" :-" :-" :-" :smt047 :smt047 :smt047 8-[ 8-[ 8-[


nice this one :-"