Page 7 of 10

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:13 pm
by Alabrax
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:another reason why I think the CIA are a joke..they openly collaborate with known cheats like Lod etc etc...and some suspected cheats..and as for the bug used against reborn, just b/c it benefitted them, none of them give a damn..which is pathetic. You want to know the reason why admin listens to me? Simply b/c I do not use things I find to my own advantage. Omegans have found numerous bugs which we've immediately reported. The free spy levels, the training/untraining exploit...who do u think reported all those bugs?

I am competitive, but I will never stoop so low as to welcome in cheaters into my own alliance to win, or exploit a bug willingly to do so.


I am glad this is what you believe and I hope that it is forever true. However since we have time and the interest in such things we have found a few things on you side that will be reported to GameMod once we have more information. Obviously this isnt YOU ETL... but rather people you call ally. And considering your stance on these things... I would think it would be in your interest also to make sure that cheating does not occur.

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:45 pm
by Rienna
I think I speak for all in CoP when I ask for you to post a thread (not spam this one) with your suspicions. if they prove to have grounds, I'm more than sure that EtL would be less-than-happy but more-than-willing to deal with them.


(less than happy for finding out his allies were cheating.)


until then, your post is moot and only goes to say "I know/think I know something you don't know"

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:17 am
by REK
:lol:

war is fun.. CIA dont ever SURRENDER :D

and yes Im descended .... I didnt choose the coward tactic.. and hide on vaction mode.. yes it is a tactic just a cowardly tactic and this goes to CoP members as well :P

please... belive me.. DDE/Omega/DD will never disband our friendship
hence no end to the CoP....

yes the game was boring....
now its not :D

you can thank the CoP for making you sissys stand up...

lol






lets see the first nerd who took that offensive and serioulsy ;-)

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:27 am
by InTuItIoN
My thoughts are that one of the biggest farms in the game has become an even bigger farm :P

http://www.stargatewars.com/stats.php?id=8268

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:33 am
by REK
wow your sig lags :?

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:35 am
by InTuItIoN
REK wrote:wow your sig lags :?


lol - Try broadband :wink: There's no lag at my end - hehe!

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:50 am
by Prior Or Ori
Alabrax wrote:
J.S. wrote:If he doesn't want to join respect his wishes.. I would rather shoot the guy who wanted me to join a war I didn't want to fight in then shoot a guy who I didn't want to kill

Thats why in Full Metal Jacket when the sargent gets it I laugh everytime thinking about it :twisted:


I thought I would throw a quote from 'The Prince' by Nicolo Machiavelli at this...

Thus it will always happen that he who is not your friend will demand your neutrality, whilst he who is your friend will entreat you to declare yourself with arms. And irresolute princes, to avoid present dangers, generally follow the neutral path, and are generally ruined.


and i shall quote the prince back to you...

"We have not seen great things done in our time except by those who have been considered mean; the rest have failed. "

and

"And a prince ought, above all things, always to endeavour in every action to gain for himself the reputation of being a great and remarkable man. "

and other quotes by Machiavelli...

"A wise man ought always to follow the paths beaten by great men, and to imitate those who have been supreme, so that if his ability does not equal theirs, at least it will savour of it. "

"he who has not first laid his foundations may be able with great ability to lay them afterwards, but they will be laid with trouble to the architect and danger to the building. "

"nothing makes a prince so much esteemed as great enterprises and setting a fine example"

and of course makaveli (aka tupac)
"All you old rappers trying to advance
It's all over now, take it like a man "

"Set me up, wet me up, n????? stuck me up
Heard the guns bust, but you tricks never shut me up
Touch one of mine on everything I own
I'll destroy everything you touch, play the game n????
All out warfare, Eye For An Eye"

next time, maybe chose someone that isn't set up for either side to quote so easily and logically in response...

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:51 am
by REK
InTuItIoN wrote:
REK wrote:wow your sig lags :?


lol - Try broadband :wink: There's no lag at my end - hehe!

I have broadband at home
but work has DSL!

crap..
<_<
>_>
>.<

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:01 am
by Mordack
Alabrax wrote:
J.S. wrote:If he doesn't want to join respect his wishes.. I would rather shoot the guy who wanted me to join a war I didn't want to fight in then shoot a guy who I didn't want to kill

Thats why in Full Metal Jacket when the sargent gets it I laugh everytime thinking about it :twisted:


I thought I would throw a quote from 'The Prince' by Nicolo Machiavelli at this...

Thus it will always happen that he who is not your friend will demand your neutrality, whilst he who is your friend will entreat you to declare yourself with arms. And irresolute princes, to avoid present dangers, generally follow the neutral path, and are generally ruined.


You get a big Mordack thumbs up for quoting Machiavelli. :D

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:31 am
by |ninja|
Prior Or Ori wrote:and i shall quote the prince back to you...

"We have not seen great things done in our time except by those who have been considered mean; the rest have failed. "

and

"And a prince ought, above all things, always to endeavour in every action to gain for himself the reputation of being a great and remarkable man. "

and other quotes by Machiavelli...

"A wise man ought always to follow the paths beaten by great men, and to imitate those who have been supreme, so that if his ability does not equal theirs, at least it will savour of it. "

"he who has not first laid his foundations may be able with great ability to lay them afterwards, but they will be laid with trouble to the architect and danger to the building. "

"nothing makes a prince so much esteemed as great enterprises and setting a fine example"

Google is useful, aye?

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:12 am
by Cole
REK wrote::lol:

war is fun.. CIA dont ever SURRENDER :D

and yes Im descended .... I didnt choose the coward tactic.. and hide on vaction mode.. yes it is a tactic just a cowardly tactic and this goes to CoP members as well :P

please... belive me.. DDE/Omega/DD will never disband our friendship
hence no end to the CoP....

yes the game was boring....
now its not :D

you can thank the CoP for making you sissys stand up...

lol






lets see the first nerd who took that offensive and serioulsy ;-)

LoL I think putting cowardice into a game is already funny, so, that will NOT be me who'll take it offensively :-D

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:32 am
by Alabrax
Rienna wrote:I think I speak for all in CoP when I ask for you to post a thread (not spam this one) with your suspicions. if they prove to have grounds, I'm more than sure that EtL would be less-than-happy but more-than-willing to deal with them.


I will. But first I want to have all my ducks in a row first. And I want to email GameMod first so he can look in to things before I post. It would be silly to post things like that before Gamemod has looked in to it. I don't want any cheater covering their tracks.

And just so you know, I also have an interest in keeping my own people (TSA) clean... and I have looked at them also. In the past I have found bad eggs and drummed them out, but right now I have found nothing.

until then, your post is moot and only goes to say "I know/think I know something you don't know"


I agree, however there is only so much snotty attitude one can take from ETL and his ravings of how we are all cheaters before someone cracks. Also I should point out that this "I know/think I know something you don't know" tact is one that ETL himself employs a lot when talking about updates that are up coming, how he knows what is coming and we have no clue. Personally I think he is full of it on this future update thing... but I have nothing to support that with other then the other possibility is that he is getting that info and that would make him a cheater... and we know he isn't one of those. And for that matter... neither am I.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:39 am
by Tauriman77
Mattwell wrote:Why does CoP keep insisting that CiA will become just liek them after the war. I don't know how many times its been said(but its a lot), CIA has only been formed to bring down CoP, and has no plans to continue after that goal has been met. To answer my own question, I guess CoP is trying to score points by argueing a point based on something we've already proven false. Its like saying what I'd do if I had a million dollars. I don't have a million dollars so it doesn't matter what I'd do with it.



im not CoP, and i have friends on both sides of the war, i just think that if CIA does win this war the leaders of the CIA alliances will be faced with a very tough desicion: stay together and be able to bassically rule over sgw until another group of alliances come and try to nock them off, or they could disband the CIA and go back to being indavidule allinces, i would go back, but i think the majority of ppl would like to rule, wouldnt you say?

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:42 am
by Alabrax
Prior Or Ori wrote:next time, maybe chose someone that isn't set up for either side to quote so easily and logically in response...


Actually the quotes you put up there could support either side, and didnt refute anything that CIA has done. Yes the COP are doing some things right, note I didn't point out how those were right. However when it comes to the neutrals... well we can see that you all are driving people to go neutral and stay neutral. That is what my quote addressed.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:43 am
by Raven
Tauriman77 wrote:
Mattwell wrote:Why does CoP keep insisting that CiA will become just liek them after the war. I don't know how many times its been said(but its a lot), CIA has only been formed to bring down CoP, and has no plans to continue after that goal has been met. To answer my own question, I guess CoP is trying to score points by argueing a point based on something we've already proven false. Its like saying what I'd do if I had a million dollars. I don't have a million dollars so it doesn't matter what I'd do with it.



im not CoP, and i have friends on both sides of the war, i just think that if CIA does win this war the leaders of the CIA alliances will be faced with a very tough desicion: stay together and be able to bassically rule over sgw until another group of alliances come and try to nock them off, or they could disband the CIA and go back to being indavidule allinces, i would go back, but i think the majority of ppl would like to rule, wouldnt you say?



I dont think so its not like CoP totally falls away after this if we win theres no power vacuum to fill as there still here but it would be nice to have wars like the old days Alliances as big as them dont have to make such an enormous pact they can easily make it happen on their own it only makes this game boring if they stay together wether we win or them it doesnt matter........