StarGateWars Forums

No i won't agree. A defense is a defense if its 1 or 100000000 trillion.
Change in OA's style of play? No one can change anything besides Admin Jason.
Everything else is interpreting figures, so yes, i shall call you bias, mine friend.

And zeek, i find that very distasteful. Comparing an actual war, which took lives and money and the hardship and torment of many nations to a game. I think we should all just cut the drama and try and have fun. Fueling ego's is not a way to conduct yourself in a game, with other people.. just some friendly advice.

Jeah sometimes people have 3, or 6 with ascended blessing!

~LordRse~ wrote:Jeah sometimes people have 3, or 6 with ascended blessing!

Oh snap

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z33tH-JdPDg

malx,

i ment no disrespect to the victimes of terrorism

all i ever mean to say is:

fight a war like it's suposed to be:
- both sides have defences and mass eachother
- the alliance who can't keep building defences and massing the other side = the losing side of the war
- the alliance who can't buid a defence and can't mass the other side = the loser of the war
- losing side aknowledges that they can't win the war by conventional means
- war ends

that's a war as it should be

I have to agree with Malx...do kindly refrain from comparing my friends to terrorists.

There are plenty of better choices of words you can use without going there.

I understand what you're trying to say, and that can be debated, but that doesn't make that post any less insulting and offensive.

RepliMagni wrote:

Malx wrote:Ok let me say this.
"Omega Naq Cost: 1371 tril "

If you actually got off your backsides and massed all of OA right now, you could easily double that figure. That would be an achievement

2) We have other FUALL alliances/members in our logs 90% of the time. That tells me I constantly rebuild for a war that spread into a multi facet, multi styled, constant battle gameplay. Do that for a few years and we'll talk.

Or i might simply give you a long glare, remind you that you're on the side of my enemy, smile, call you bias and move along..

Its not bias old boy, just pointing out facts. You're not "fighting" Omega, you're being sat on...and its plain for all to see. Kinda sad really - I liked EPA under Wolf and JaseB and co...

Doesn't being sat on by someone require them to actually hit you once in a while? OA does nothing to hinder how I play the game, and all they've achieved so far is descending accounts that were inactive before the war. OA's done nothing to earn defense's to mass. Meanwhile DDE continues to battle us constantly, so apparently we do have defenses.

zeekomkommer wrote:malx,

i ment no disrespect to the victimes of terrorism

all i ever mean to say is:

fight a war like it's suposed to be:
- both sides have defences and mass eachother
- the alliance who can't keep building defences and massing the other side = the losing side of the war
- the alliance who can't buid a defence and can't mass the other side = the loser of the war
- losing side aknowledges that they can't win the war by conventional means
- war ends

that's a war as it should be

No, not really. We use asymmetric warfare against OA since the power level shifts to their deep pockets. Conventional means do not apply.

Malx wrote: No, not really. We use asymmetric warfare against OA since the power level shifts to their deep pockets. Conventional means do not apply.

This statement would indicate that EPA is holding out for something.

What is it? What are you aiming to do?

Tekki wrote:

Malx wrote: No, not really. We use asymmetric warfare against OA since the power level shifts to their deep pockets. Conventional means do not apply.

This statement would indicate that EPA is holding out for something?

What is it? What are you aiming to do?

It means we don't use conventional means. Build def/mass/get massed don't work with us or OA. They have deep pockets, we have our own playing style, in our own time.

Malx wrote:

Tekki wrote:

Malx wrote: No, not really. We use asymmetric warfare against OA since the power level shifts to their deep pockets. Conventional means do not apply.

This statement would indicate that EPA is holding out for something?

What is it? What are you aiming to do?

It means we don't use conventional means. Build def/mass/get massed don't work with us or OA. They have deep pockets, we have our own playing style, in our own time.

No Pet Pet, you misinterpret Mistress Me, deliberately I think.

What are you hoping to accomplish by continuing your asymmetric war with OA?

Tekki wrote:

Malx wrote:

Tekki wrote:

Malx wrote: No, not really. We use asymmetric warfare against OA since the power level shifts to their deep pockets. Conventional means do not apply.

This statement would indicate that EPA is holding out for something?

What is it? What are you aiming to do?

It means we don't use conventional means. Build def/mass/get massed don't work with us or OA. They have deep pockets, we have our own playing style, in our own time.

No Pet Pet, you misinterpret Mistress Me, deliberately I think.

What are you hoping to accomplish by continuing your asymmetric war with OA?

Oh, now i understand!
Consolidate our accounts, gameplay and ourselves!

Malx wrote:

Tekki wrote:

Malx wrote:

Tekki wrote:

Malx wrote: No, not really. We use asymmetric warfare against OA since the power level shifts to their deep pockets. Conventional means do not apply.

This statement would indicate that EPA is holding out for something?

What is it? What are you aiming to do?

It means we don't use conventional means. Build def/mass/get massed don't work with us or OA. They have deep pockets, we have our own playing style, in our own time.

No Pet Pet, you misinterpret Mistress Me, deliberately I think.

What are you hoping to accomplish by continuing your asymmetric war with OA?

Oh, now i understand!
Consolidate our accounts, gameplay and ourselves!

All of which is very nice political talk but really says nothing.

You are a diplomat Pet Pet, be concise and precise and clarify for me what you mean with that statement? You wish to consolidate your accounts? How? Game play? Your game play style dictates a minimum of stats and being attacked at someone elses leisure? And yourselves? Truly this one escapes me, though perhaps it is the key to understanding the self view here.

OA, through farm hits and HE's duals has paid for quite a few of my ascensions and such. In this game, anyone can attack anyone at whim...
Also, the war with OA has bonded us more.

So this is not a war to you, merely a matter of convenience?

Tekki wrote:So this is not a war to you, merely a matter of convenience?

No, we like the war and thrive off it even tho we didn't want it.