Page 1 of 2
who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:41 am
by [KMA]Avenger
for the past week i wasn't able to login to my ascended account (details of which i have already gone into in other posts and wont go into them again) and so wasn't able to see who descended me, last night (with lots of help) i finally got my ascended account details and logged in to my ascended account to find i have been descended by a prior (meaning he's only just ascended and has a very small army).
since i'm descended i cant do anything not even change the name on the account till my sentence is up, so i asked a friend to descend him and i would take care of his main account...trouble with that is because he ascended less than 60 days ago he cant be descended (understandable really) but he can go around descending others...how is that fair?
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:42 am
by Giovanni
it isnt but meh live with it, life is not fair
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:46 am
by [KMA]Avenger
ain't that the truth
don't get me wrong, i'm not crying about this, in fact i might thank the bleeder for the fun i will have with him lol
i just think admin needs to think things thru more carefully when bringing in updates.
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:16 am
by Castiel
Thats not fair at all :s
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:28 am
by Castiel
Jack wrote:If you can dish it out, then you can to take it.
It's not simply unfair, it's fundamentally wrong.
Yeah either make it so he can take ascended attacks or make so he cant make nor take.
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:45 am
by [KMA]Avenger
i understand why admin has made it so newbies to the ascended plain can't be descended. i don't have a problem with that, i just have a problem with not being able to retaliate against an aggressor.
if someone choses to attack someone else then they should be prepared for an immediate retaliatory strike against them .
i know of no other instance where someone has been an aggressor and has not expected some kind of retaliation
there is 1 solution to this...
when someone ascends for the fist time and chose to attack someone with the intention of descending them, they have to tick a box to confirm the action. next to the box there could some text warning them of the possibility of a retaliatory strike against them which could result in their immediate descension even tho they have only just ascended.
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:54 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:04 am
by ~Artanis~
I have put in it live with it coz I want to p*** you off lmao
It isnt fair but thse 60 days will end soon,sooner then you think and btw...
i know of no other instance where someone has been an aggressor and has not expected some kind of retaliation
I was the agressor last week when I massed The Ancients and he didnt made a single attack or attempt on my acount,now there you have it,now you know him lol
,simple answer to a fair question
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:09 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Zerathull wrote:I have put in it live with it coz I want to p*** you off lmao
It isnt fair but thse 60 days will end soon,sooner then you think and btw...
i know of no other instance where someone has been an aggressor and has not expected some kind of retaliation
I was the agressor last week when I massed The Ancients and he didnt made a single attack or attempt on my acount,now there you have it,now you know him lol
,simple answer to a fair question
not even a rude PM?
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:20 am
by RepliJake
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:25 am
by hidden
wish that was an actual link
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:52 am
by [KMA]Avenger
thats priceless mate
well this n00b is going to get a rude awakening, hence my planet names
____ God Of War ??? ???
you are on my hit list! ??? ???
you chose to descend me ??? ???
now you have to ??? ???
pay the piper!!! ??? ???
don't cry when i smash you ??? ???
thats why we have forums ??? ???
and God Quest ??? ???
see you real soon buddy
) ??? ???
have a nice day
??? ???
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:37 am
by Reaperman
[AK]Avenger wrote:for the past week i wasn't able to login to my ascended account (details of which i have already gone into in other posts and wont go into them again) and so wasn't able to see who descended me, last night (with lots of help) i finally got my ascended account details and logged in to my ascended account to find i have been descended by a prior (meaning he's only just ascended and has a very small army).
since i'm descended i cant do anything not even change the name on the account till my sentence is up, so i asked a friend to descend him and i would take care of his main account...trouble with that is because he ascended less than 60 days ago he cant be descended (understandable really) but he can go around descending others...how is that fair?
Sucks a bit but dont worry, just send me his ascended ID and as soon as his 60 days are up he's gonna spend a lot of time being descended
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:45 am
by The WuTang
Please stop whining. you are blaming admin for your own stupidity. You losing your login details for ascension is your own fault. This is how the game is played.
it is your fault to begin with and im pretty sure the admin has much more important things to attend to.
and yes this is fair.
Re: who else thinks this is wrong?
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:46 am
by Juliette
The_Lurker wrote:Please stop whining. you are blaming admin for your own stupidity. You losing your login details for ascension is your own fault. This is how the game is played.
it is your fault to begin with and im pretty sure the admin has much more important things to attend to.
and yes this is fair.
Heh.. at least it's clear where you stand, mate.
