Page 1 of 2
Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:35 am
by SVaRuN
Just so ppl can debate, oversee this war again or outsiders share the view...
I for one will say that I am glad I am alongside with ppl I am and am glad I was part of this war which has as previous ones thought me a lot, considering the length and extent naturally the experienced I have gained are bigger also...
And would like to thank the so named Barbarians for the fight they provided...
Blue
Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:41 am
by Giovanni
id like the names of all the mercs who r after you

Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:55 am
by Juliette
Interesting..
* applauds all fighters *
Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:07 pm
by Mukasa
Giovanni wrote:id like the names of all the mercs who r after you

mercs is a wrong word...cause there are no mercs left
there are few individuals.....aka runners.
Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:13 pm
by Castiel
Mukasa wrote:Giovanni wrote:id like the names of all the mercs who r after you

mercs is a wrong word...cause there are no mercs left
there are few individuals.....aka runners.
Runners like Ronon 4TW
Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:40 pm
by Bullseye
Just want to say congrates to all, its been a very enjoyable war to follow, for the most part seemed everyone was having fun and have made new friends and quite possibly enemies for life.
Anyway well done all involved.
Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:03 pm
by papa~smurf
lot of things where said, lot of mud was thrown, but for me, in the end, it was all good fun. SGW is like a play we all get to act in, it really means very little out side this world we all come in to. So i find more and more i enjoy the dramas of conflict as well as the building in peace
congrads SAv, nice job, had a great time and thanks for all the NAQ
Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:16 pm
by Castiel
halamander wrote: lot of mud was thrown
I've got a jar of dirt and guess whats inside it !
Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:48 am
by Juliette
A Roman heart?
Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:57 am
by Bullseye
Meth wrote:halamander wrote: lot of mud was thrown
I've got a jar of dirt and guess whats inside it !
Dirt.

Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:25 am
by Juliette
I thought the jar was made of dirt..

Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:33 am
by Nigatsu_Aka
Meth wrote:halamander wrote: lot of mud was thrown
I've got a jar of dirt and guess whats inside it !
Cookies?

Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:55 am
by papa~smurf
Meth wrote:halamander wrote: lot of mud was thrown
I've got a jar of dirt and guess whats inside it !
if it's ten till, please broker it asap lol
Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:23 pm
by Castiel
it seems like p00p.
Hal ill broker it now.
Re: Romans vs Barbarians
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:22 pm
by MajorLeeHurts
I have taken what I have learned about this war, and come to a conclusion.
This war and its cause were in the beginning for the good of the farmed and to halt the farmers. There will alwayse be conflict regarding these same issues regardless of who is doing the farming and who is complaining about it.
It is understandable that a large and powerful alliance has to farm somewhere it is the nature of the game. To attack smaller accts is just unprofitable and and to attk larger acct creates conflict there is no easy way other than to accept some fair farming and to assert fair policy regarding farming.
It is however inevitable to encounter an ass hole factor when conflict over farming ensues. Hence bad relations and miss communications and anger fuel players to confront farming with new strategies and coalitions to again protect and defend against said farming.
Having said that I would add it is no surprise that a group or coalition of players would plan ( plott, scheam) to confront the opposing or farming coalition and or players. Also , it should and would be expected or planned to resist such opposition as in fact it was, weather by design or by coincidence.
It is unfortunate that the avenues and attempts at communication from both side were closed due to personal reasons and no other options were available. Be it mistrust , dislike, or any other reasons the failing's were and can be attributed to a lack of communication between allies and enemy's alike.
This war was lost due to a lack of and withholding of information and communication. It should be evident by the outcome that our opponent succeeded where we could not due to their, and directly attributed to their open lines of communication and willingness to share and trust their comrades.
It is my hope that people take from this conflict an ideal of trust and an inkling of humanizing the players who would fight for you and with you. Because in the end we are people not numbers.
There was allot of sadness at the conclusion of this war we lost some great players and formidable alliances, and great farms. I applaud my fellow comrades and opponents for a great war aside from all the BS.