Page 1 of 3
The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:01 am
by Juliette
.. get laid.
Indeed.. all these sexual references are so very much indicative of a great lack of sex.
It's by no means a vindication of the population.. just an observation. Amusing to see such statistical perfection returned in one population.
Seems apparent who does get laid and who doesn't. One can just keep a tally, really.
Great Caesar, don't you just love drawing conclusions that aren't deductible from the observations? Ah well.. I stand by my earlier remark.
At least Jack had a good one last night.
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:03 am
by Castiel
im fine i had sex this morning.
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:06 am
by Iƒrit
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:10 am
by Legendary Apophis
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:16 am
by Suzuk
Yeah, I'm satisfied....
... but should you really be telling these kids that they need to get laid?
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:28 am
by Severian
...find some common sense
...encourage some communal spirit
...rediscover common curtosy and respect
...sell your defences and draw all the naq from out of the bank and tell me
Would have sufficed as well.
Boarding Hate Trains = Bad.
Building Communal Bridges = Good.
Would have also sufficed.
But I guess calling up the significant other at 2:30am and demanding more sex is just as good...and will end up with me returning to the single life
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:38 am
by blahh
on to do list.
keep up with good sugestions
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:16 am
by traprunner
Post that list Auriel. I think it would be funny
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:22 am
by Juliette
traprunner wrote:Post that list Auriel. I think it would be funny
I might be convinced to do that..
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:53 am
by Clarkey
I have no complaints.... very satisfied.
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:10 am
by El TC
who is that girl in your avatar clarkey?
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:14 am
by Clarkey
El TC wrote:who is that girl in your avatar clarkey?
Hayden Panettiere
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:15 am
by Juliette
El TC wrote:who is that girl in your avatar clarkey?
That's Clarkey.
The guy next to her, I don't know.
They do look satisfied, no?
(j/k Clarkey, mate)
Who would not recognise Claire Bennet..
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:38 am
by El TC
ok, but dont say you the guy with her?
Re: The general population of SGW needs to..
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:40 am
by Juliette
El TC wrote:ok, but dont say you the guy with her?
Course he is. Why would he have an avatar with a random guy and Hayden Panettiere? That'd be silly.
Besides, why aren't you asking all this in PM? Kinda pointless to derail the thread, hun.
