Page 1 of 2

The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA) Closed

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:27 am
by Demon Lord Razgriz
On this page, We talk about military hardware. Like tanks, planes, etc. Each week we talk about something new. You use the poll to decide what we talk about next week.

This week we will talk about the PAK-FA, Russia answer to the F-22 & F-35 JSF. The stats for this fighter is not known as of yet. It will be put in to production in 2010, it was originally suppose be 2009, but due to technaical problems it was pushed back a year. The pic is a artist impression of the plane. From the looks of it, I would say it's a stealth plane like its American counterparts.
300px-Artists_impression.jpg

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:36 pm
by Solus
Just to clarify, Which PAK-FA aircraft are we discussing here? the pic provided isnt much to go by. also, there are a few aircraft with that name, one from Sukhoi, one from Mikoyan Gurevich.

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:50 pm
by Demon Lord Razgriz
The Sukuoi company was the designer that won the contract for the PAK-FA. There was a big mess in Russia due to them choosing Sukuoi over MiG. The plane Sukuoi had designed was the Su-47 Berkurt. But due to tech problems, the Su-47 loss it Forward Swept Wings (FSW). So they put conventional wings on it.

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:56 pm
by Solus
dammit... the FSW setup gave it its edge in maneuverability despite its weight. ah well... even tho its a concept at the moment, I'm interested to see what it ends up as.

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:29 am
by Demon Lord Razgriz
The conventional wing design is still very maneuverable, but doesn't have the stablilty problems of a FSW design. Of coruse it has loss the coolness factor that a FSW has.

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:49 pm
by Solus
Demon Lord Razgriz wrote:The conventional wing design is still very maneuverable, but doesn't have the stablilty problems of a FSW design. Of coruse it has loss the coolness factor that a FSW has.


with the onboard systems involved, instability can be used to the pilots advantage. this is what gave it its edge in maneuverability. and yes... FSW just looks cool too :P

actually, ive been designing a jet concept for an art project for a while now, it too uses a FSW configuration. it just looks awesome :P

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:30 pm
by Demon Lord Razgriz
.:SOULLESS:. wrote:actually, ive been designing a jet concept for an art project for a while now, it too uses a FSW configuration. it just looks awesome :P


I do that to, but on paper most of the time. Some times I use MS paint. For such a bad program, I think I do alright. I would show one but the forum won't let me.

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:58 pm
by Solus
Demon Lord Razgriz wrote:
.:SOULLESS:. wrote:actually, ive been designing a jet concept for an art project for a while now, it too uses a FSW configuration. it just looks awesome :P


I do that to, but on paper most of the time. Some times I use MS paint. For such a bad program, I think I do alright. I would show one but the forum won't let me.


i generally do mine in Paint because of a lack of control and tolerances on paper. i'd show mine too, but these jets are being used in a story im writing, i cant let them out. :P

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 8:09 am
by Demon Lord Razgriz
Well the plane I wanted to show was a cross between the F-22 and Su-47.
It had the Raptors body and the Berkut's wings and tail control surfaces. Anyway, we need to get back on the topic.

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:12 pm
by Solus
yeah good point...

haha, this PAK-FA project sounds interesting... so is it just purely to match the US's F22 and JSF? and wouldnt it be better for Sukhoi to use a new design rather than just recreating and recycling the Berkut? new engineering philosophies have come about in the last decade, i think it better to start the design again.

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:24 pm
by Demon Lord Razgriz
The Su-47 was meant for PAK-FA. MiGs plane was the MiG-1.42 & 1.44. Don't ask me why it that MiG is named that. I want to know too. As for redesigning the plane... They had spent millions of Rubes (Russian Dollar) originally designing the aircraft, so they just changed the wing to save money.

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 4:55 am
by Solus
while the saving money point may be valid, i reiterate my point about it being outdated technology. however i still like it :P im just picky :P

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:24 pm
by Demon Lord Razgriz
.:SOULLESS:. wrote:while the saving money point may be valid, i reiterate my point about it being outdated technology. however i still like it :P im just picky :P


It's not really outdated, if it was, then we need to get rid of the F-22. The Raptor was first designed in 1985, so it's a 23 year old design. The Su-47 is a prototype aircraft, so the technology on is cutting-edge.

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:51 am
by Solus
Demon Lord Razgriz wrote:
.:SOULLESS:. wrote:while the saving money point may be valid, i reiterate my point about it being outdated technology. however i still like it :P im just picky :P


It's not really outdated, if it was, then we need to get rid of the F-22. The Raptor was first designed in 1985, so it's a 23 year old design. The Su-47 is a prototype aircraft, so the technology on is cutting-edge.


true, im thinking specifically of the F35 JSF... lol nvm, i has some weird theories anyway :P

lol now i think of it... the C-130 Hercules transport used widely today was designed ages ago... if i recall correctly, first flight was in the late 50's... lol

but seriously now, to counter the F35 in particular will be a major task... the Helmet Display system and the "first look" weapons system in the JSF wont be easy to emulate. :P

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (PAK-FA this week)

Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:34 pm
by Demon Lord Razgriz
I'm stop the topic, only 1 person even bother to reply.