StarGateWars Forums

Today i was looking through the attack logs and i have found that naps are a major part of the game is it for the good or the bad?

go lone wolf, grow a pair and hit whoever you want thats what i would do if i wasnt fuall lol though dont build a defence

lol diplomacy is not my strong point

Don Lewis wrote:go lone wolf, grow a pair and hit whoever you want thats what i would do if i wasnt fuall lol though dont build a defence

I would need more than just one pair to do that Plus your attack weapons can be too easly sabbed away that way The good days are well gone now that there is a massive one sidded empire they call Fuall.

There are plenty of other alliances and lone wolves at your disposal. You just have to look harder...

Actually to be honest I can't remember a time when their weren't NAPs between top alliances even if they weren't always written down. It has been this way ever since the formation of the first "super alliance" the GA. Now I wasn't around at lunch so I am guessing the first few months may have been a free for all but this has been the way of the game for some time. If the large alliances wouldn't have these they would be in constant war with each other and wouldn't be able to grow much.

Richard_Destroyer wrote:Does anyone remember back when there was a great list of people we could hit when we went on farm quests cause I can’t as I was trolling the attack logs today thinking nap with Roman s nap with TAF ohh can’t hit Fuall. WHO CAN I HIT? Does anyone else feel like naps have taken over?

You answered your own question. You have chosen who you will or more appropriately "won't" hit. Maybe the fault isnt in NAP's themselves, but who you have them with. You chose to NAP. You chose to limit your farms. Alas, there are good farms out there. The alliances you mention go farming as well you know.

Jack wrote:Everyone likes to say this is a "war game" but no one really acts like it. Then again, diplomacy is a huge part of war, however there is such a thing as too much diplomacy.

Looks at Asgard Order Elite..

_Ancient God Anubis_ wrote:

Jack wrote:Everyone likes to say this is a "war game" but no one really acts like it. Then again, diplomacy is a huge part of war, however there is such a thing as too much diplomacy.

Looks at Asgard Order Elite..

No Asgard Nation these days. And yeh they have lost alot of members on that but i dont know how bad it is today with their naps. I know they dont have a NAP with my empire lol so they have slowed down a bit.

they got rid of a fair few of their NAP's about 8 months ago as they realised they had to many but then have gotten some more since then.

Lord Raf wrote:they got rid of a fair few of their NAP's about 8 months ago as they realised they had to many but then have gotten some more since then.

LOL cool so all as it should be.

Thats exactly the problem wih the game..well no, the problem with the people who play it.

Thats why TSA only has one NAP and thats with the Collective and only really due to the fact that me and Odin are mates ingame ooh and i suppose myself and tweety have a mutual no hit thing.

You don't think it's the calm before the proverbial storm?

Saber wrote:Actually to be honest I can't remember a time when their weren't NAPs between top alliances even if they weren't always written down. It has been this way ever since the formation of the first "super alliance" the GA. Now I wasn't around at lunch so I am guessing the first few months may have been a free for all but this has been the way of the game for some time. If the large alliances wouldn't have these they would be in constant war with each other and wouldn't be able to grow much.

I agree, before FUALL and the other big empires today, there was the CoP, EPAC, the Grand Alliance. In any case, there have always been alliances that hit back hard when being farmed. It is up to the individual player's decision-making process whether hitting certain people is worth it or not. That doesn't mean farming isn't profitable.

Mordack wrote:You don't think it's the calm before the proverbial storm?

to calm silence before the storm

and its alway's been like that