StarGateWars Forums

Not really a big deal but i think it would be good if the person who made the broker was able to decline aswell. Just a thought.

They cant really scam that way, as if they decline it they get nothing but what they put into it.

I like this idea of the user being able to decline it, many times ive seen someone post accepting brokers now, so i set one, and they don't log in for 2 days, or it auto expires....

sounds pretty good to me, would be useful

yes,

I completely support the idea.

this happened to me countless times that some n00b was selling turns on market and he didn't accept the trade for two days ....

so it woudl be very good to implent it !

31. Rejecting own brokers IT'S NOT GOING TO BE ADDED!!!!!

Incase this is what you are suggesting.

why shouldn't this be added? it's very frustrating when you're in need of a resource such as turns and you set a broker with some1 like others have stated and they don't even log on again for a day or two

evilevi777 wrote:why shouldn't this be added? it's very frustrating when you're in need of a resource such as turns and you set a broker with some1 like others have stated and they don't even log on again for a day or two

thats exactly why i suggested it. when im selling turns i like the broker to be accepted straight away so i look for ppl online, but sometimes they go offline as soon as i set the broker.

I dont see a reason why it wouldnt be put in. as far as i can see nothing bad would come of it, or could come of it.

Yes it would be a good thing to have but obviously admin don't want it in the game... Don't know why. You'll just have to be careful when you make a broker then I guess.

I dont see how holding naq in a broker is really going to help, its just the same as sending it to a friend, as for the AT it wont let you go above the 10k limit no matter what, already been tried, even if i broker away 9k AT's someone cannot send me say 4k then the other person reject it, its been that way since admin changed it, unless a bug has recently popped up that has stopped it.

But - there is more risk in sending resources to a friend (whether by normal sending or broker), when there is no self-decline.

Implementing a self decline takes away the risk and does leave the broker, potentially, open to abuse.

It is not needed to improve the game, people simply want it as an added convenience to avoid a risk that can already be negated by properly arranging trades through increased communication.

It's very easy to store more naq then your bank can hold with no/minimal risk even if you don't have a friend to broker.

Exactly.