StarGateWars Forums

At the moment there is a certain group of people using, this rather annoying bug.

What they do is they take a small strike and hit their own allaince member/ or allied member and they spam attack him, making it very difficult to impossible for anyone else to attack him.

Then when this person does get phased, they have someone attack that account on the turn change so that no damage can be done.

I must say, it's a great way to keep a 9 tril strike around, cause if the enemy can't attack you your effectively on ppt.

Away with that horrendous exploit!

well that would mean remove the nox.

Seems to me like just another strategy in war.. I fail to see how it's any different than say turn farming your allies so that your enemies don't get the naq.

Um, this has been around for a long time.

Whats next, no attacking someone more than once per turn ?

its not a bug its part of the game, if u got rid of it nox would really mean nothing. i say let them be **Filtered** and waste their ATs like that.

This has been around as long as nox+critical has been.

High Emptys just mad that the guy that massed ETL's stirke is being protected this way.

It HAS to stay, always been here since nox came, afterall!

Legendary Apophis wrote:It HAS to stay, always been here since nox came, afterall!

Put the people that have paid forum for the soon to come new update want it to change!

High Empty wrote:At the moment there is a certain group of people using, this rather annoying bug.

What they do is they take a small strike and hit their own allaince member/ or allied member and they spam attack him, making it very difficult to impossible for anyone else to attack him.

Then when this person does get phased, they have someone attack that account on the turn change so that no damage can be done.

I must say, it's a great way to keep a 9 tril strike around, cause if the enemy can't attack you your effectively on ppt.

Allow me to translate...

High Empty wrote:*whine* they are doing something so i can't hit them! just because I'm seeing/have seen people on my side doing it too im going to turn a blind eye to them because TLE are pwning us and i dont like it! */whine*

-Goodie

isn't etl's strike being protected in the same manner?



Bill




If you want it fixed, you should try after the war....during the war isn't cool.

On a side note...


Would you like some cheese to go with your whine?

High Empty wrote:Get the sissy tears ready.

High Empty wrote:Get over it.

Cant be arsed to find more.


This is almost as serious as the 100 atacks in 60sec bug/exploit tbh.


I do hope these new war updates take a dent in the nox problem across the board cos its kinda a buzzkill when it comes to plain old def massings aswell heh. Autodeclare + no nox I say. But then again, that`d prolly mean mass disbandments heh.

High Empty wrote:At the moment there is a certain group of people using, this rather annoying bug.

What they do is they take a small strike and hit their own allaince member/ or allied member and they spam attack him, making it very difficult to impossible for anyone else to attack him.

Then when this person does get phased, they have someone attack that account on the turn change so that no damage can be done.

I must say, it's a great way to keep a 9 tril strike around, cause if the enemy can't attack you your effectively on ppt.

Why not simply tell admin Jason, wink wink, hows your granny secret handshake.

You know...I remember this being around over a year ago before I left. Bah, stop the whining....This is stupid.


I used it myself when in alpha..it was a regular tactic. IF you don't like it....too bad?



Whine Whine Whine...You all weren't whining when you used it.....



This really irks me, I mean, common...If you can't play the game, then don't login. Because this isn't some new tactic just figured out...This has been going on since NOX came out.

pianomutt20000 wrote:I used it myself when in alpha..it was a regular tactic. IF you don't like it....too bad?

What did you use? The whining tactic?
(just kidding.. "Why so serious?")