Page 1 of 2
[WAR OVER] Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:44 am
by Kikaz
For being annoying, duh!
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:45 am
by mikgamer1
:O What about the lulz!?!??
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:14 am
by Mercury Rising
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:16 am
by mikgamer1
Lulz at anyone who thinks we are or will ever be bored.
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:16 am
by Zhar
ohh nooooo. he's gonna run and cry just like he did when i was farming him.
and spam your inbox with stupid threats.

Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:16 am
by Feri
As long as theres nubs like you to mass, we wont get bored, EVER.
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:18 am
by mikgamer1
Zhar wrote:ohh nooooo. he's gonna run and cry just like he did when i was farming him.
and spam your inbox with stupid threats.

He's already spamming some inboxes and obviously the forums here with pointless threats and spam...he never learns any new tricks eh?
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:58 am
by Kikaz
My lulz hurt.
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:00 am
by Derelict
First question what is a lulz? I personally cannot stand incorrect spelling Unless in a name.
Also I would like a true reason for a war against us. If you have an issue with just one of our members please don't include the entire alliance, as for a 1 v 1.
But if you have an issue with everyone or a majority of our alliance then sure an Alliance war is fair. But I would like reasons; clear, concise and not something like they are annoying.
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:09 am
by S1eepy
with owned, you are not likely to get the reasons you wish.
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:14 am
by mikgamer1
Mercury Rising - I think it's obvious by reading any posts between Owned. members and him on these forums

.
Threat - I believe has a reason.
tzuicabej and yourself - I am not sure, you will have to ask Kikaz that.
So right now 1-1/2 of your members have a reason

.
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:17 am
by HippyFool
S1eepy wrote:with owned, you are not likely to get the reasons you wish.
And insulting the word 'Lulz', makes them LULZ even more
Just give up asking why they do it..its obvious...they do it for fun...they dont need a reason...
Fight on Q - not on the forums

Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:25 am
by Mercury Rising
he was not fighting on the forums
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:28 am
by Derelict
I'm all for a war I would just like a decent reason before such occurs. Something as he annoyed me just is pointless.
Mikgamer wrote:Mercury Rising - I think it's obvious by reading any posts between Owned. members and him on these forums

.
Threat - I believe has a reason.
tzuicabej and yourself - I am not sure, you will have to ask Kikaz that.
So right now 1-1/2 of your members have a reason

.
I can understand MR's. tzuicabej wasn't even a part of the alliance when the massings happened. Myself i think may have been for some sabbings...
But two reason's does make a majority....
Re: Owned. vs Malicious Intent
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:30 am
by mikgamer1
Ok just read you sabbed, so that makes 2-1/2 of your 3 members as you say at the time of massing? Or did you have more?