Congrats Tetris, your complete bull headed self-righteous insistence has actually ticked me off. Let me tell you, that's very hard to do, but you managed to overcome multiple obstacles placed around my cool reserve with your consistent
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
. So, I award you the following:
Tetrismonkey is here by awarded the Phoenix Award for Perseverence, for pursuing ideas that most sane forum users would have abandoned long ago
Presentation over. Now, on to the matters at hand.
First to address the ultimatum. If you read it, and have read any of Jack's clarifications, it's really a simple concept. The following diagram should explain its existence:
1) You insulted other users who had different ideas, probably using the line "it's not an insult because it's true" as well, one of the lamest attempts to make up for an insult in the history of conversation, right after "I was hypnotized" and right before "I didn't say that (though I did and I don't have the balls to admit it)
2) You then proceed to throw a temper tantrum about how another user has insulted you, adding in things such as Jack's revenge, mod bias, and how your mother doesn't love (which isn't true yet, but that's only because she hasn't read your posts on this forum).
Now, as you can see, there is a distortion in logic here. You insult people, but then you can't take insults? If you haven't heard the phrase "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen", perhaps now would be a good time to be introduced. In case that analogy happens to go over your head, I'll translate it for you: "If you can't take something from others, don't do it to them". However, this thought obviously has not crossed your mind, along with others jewels of logic I'm sure.
However, this hypocrasy stood out to our brash Texan, who created the ultimatum. If you bothered to read past the name of the poster, you might have noticed that the only thing the ultimatum really said was "Stop insulting, or stop complaining about being insulted". Basically, stop it or shut up. It's a really simple concept, but perhaps that's why you missed it. And if you look back at the cause section of this post (see the "diagram", and I use the term loosely), you can see that your behavior actually caused this ultimatum. So, no matter who authorized this, you caused your own embarrassment with the need of an ultimatum. I now present to you the
Phoenix Award of Exceptional Planning.
---
Now, on to your claims that Jack is not a good mod because he abuses his mod power, a topic that has been beaten so badly that if it was a person, all of it's bodily liquids would be gone as well as its skeletal structure and organs, as those would have been pulverized to liquid by this point. So far, there has been one instance when Jack was abusive as a mod. Was Jack's choice to edit the said post wrong? No, far from it. Did Jack do so in a way that was unprofessional? Yes, an easy admission. Was this matter handled by Forum? (notice the captial "F" in Forum. That means, as far as this site is concerned, God. See if you can remember that for the next sentence. In case you forgot already, Forum=God) Yes, the matter was considered settled. Has Jack acted unprofessionally
as a mod? That answer would be a resounding no, unless you happen to be the guy who flagged his post banning AGA because of the pic, in which case I roll my eyes in your general direction.
So, we have a situation which has been dealt with by "God", and a mod who, on the job, has not broken the rules. While this hasn't stopped you from your continued crusade of nonsense, it has forced you to get new material. So you go to Jack's behavior while not a mod and claim it is unbecoming of a mod and he should be removed for it. Want to hear the best part? There's another person in this argument who acts just as aggressive, insulting, and bull headed as Jack. This person then tries to pretend he isn't (something Jack is not so dishonest to do) and then (here's the "best" best part) this person thinks they are good mod material. Hilarious, right? Who could be that delusional. Oh wait... it's you. So, for a hattrick of awards, I present the
Phoenix Award of Character.
---
Finally, to end this circus of ridiculousity (yes, I did make that word up if it doesn't exist) which you have brought upon yourself, I'll address the forum bias. You recieved two warnings, right? And both were spam, yes? And very few others have has the same thing happen, also correct? Do you remember, by chance, what those warnings were for? Didn't they deal with... reviving a topic that was dealt with (by "God")? So... you would be necromancing. Not only are you necromancing, but necromancing demonic ideas, as "God" had laid them to rest. Now, the following logic is pretty simple. Demonic=Bad=Not to be disturbed. But, as any other twisted and power hungry dark sorcerer might do, you ignored that logic and continued to raise a topic which should be resting in its grave. This gets you a record setting four awards (mainly because you are the first to get them) with the
Phoenix Award of Brilliance. Basically, you deserved every warning you got, and if you were really to be warned for all your spamming, you would have been permabanned last month and we wouldn't still be wasting our time **Filtered** about this stupid topic!
Edited for coherence. Rants typically tend to waver grammatically at some points.
<---thaltek
<---forums
[/spoiler]
