StarGateWars Forums

This allaince, Vis Dominor Asgard , has to many members with almost same ID, atatcking at the same time (vulturing allainces in war).

IDs: 1931568, 1938640, 1925573, 1910163, 1935043, 1922629, 1933356, 1935639, 1920306, 1926782, 1938370, 1940002, 1937431, 1920239, 1939157, 1937136, 1931575, 1923513, 1931071, 1933744, 1941039, 1941748, 1922139, 1927756, 1942043, 1941725, 1933549, 1940965, 1931477, 1943203, 1913325, 1914897, 1921647, 1914723, 1935250, 1932735, 1936974, 1934649, 1940022, 1935447, 1938812

thats all, lol... and this is not including those in perg. than there are IDs around 75k, around 90k and 100k... somwhere one teacher decided to teach maths on SGW so whole class has own account? nice BIG class than, 94 schoolmates.

can admin check if the IP is same? and if is, maybe its school so dont bann this math class

Firstly the whole point in that alliance is to recuit new players, so that easily explains the close IDs etc.

However, how do you know they are attacking at the same time?

maybe cause they are vulturing us?

and yes, recruiting at the same time, but 94 members, all asgards, almost same stats, same sizes? good luck clarkey. if you will recruit 10 ppl with ID, race, size, stats... your Boss.

caesar2 wrote:good luck clarkey. if you will recruit 10 ppl with ID, race, size, stats... your Boss.

What?

I guess he meant it's too much of a coincidence.

VDA is clean, as far as I know they're all just very new players, Asgard only, and kind of the first pool one can jump in before applying for bigger Asgard only alliances like Asgard Nation/Order, etc.

I dont think their leader would knowingly allow multis - not that I know him.. but I have seen him post on the forums.

I do agree an alliance of all unascended asgards - with Full SS (if any of them have it) is a scary thought.. but not bannable (spelling?) -

Contact their alliance leader, I am sure some other alliance of another race would love to take them on (sorry I dont watch the show, so I cannot role-play whatever race that would be)

Cheers

Explanations..
ID: Close, because they recruit new players. A few older players, so older IDs.
Race: It's an Asgard-only alliance.
Size: If they were bigger, they'd apply to the bigger alliances.
Stats: Equal due to size similarities.

Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote:Explanations..
ID: Close, because they recruit new players. A few older players, so older IDs.
Race: It's an Asgard-only alliance.
Size: If they were bigger, they'd apply to the bigger alliances.
Stats: Equal due to size similarities.

am not acusing whole alliance. older accounts IDs are near as well. as i said, maybe math class.

There's no harm in checking it out.
Afterall, an alliance with 93 members (majority new accounts) could easily have a few multis that the leader wouldn't be aware of.

feel free to investigate the integrity of my alliance. if you catch any cheaters, well and good. however, as many have already posted here, the IDs of the players would be almost all the same being as most of the members of the alliance are new players. they are also close in ranks because i am pushing them to ascend before the end of september.

i created that alliance to specifically recruit new players and help them understand and catch on to SGW. too many new players leave the game because there is no in game mechanism that can help them directly.

but whatever reason there may be, an investigation is in order.

as for the old players, there are only a handful of them. investigating them will be easy.

thanks for the heads-up. and thanks all of you for vouching for me.

as for vulturing you guys, well my CO is white dwarf, a member of CoTo. Clarkey recommended me to him. My whole alliance knows that white dwarf is looking for officers. Aside from myself, another one of my members is an officer of white dwarf.

If in fact, we were vulturing you sir, then wouldn't have white dwarf said something to me?

Thats nice job what are you doing, as i wrote, maybe math school. i wasnt far, its an asgard school.

i sent msg to white dwarf, and thema vulturing is for another place, not here.

you are right. the vulturing issue should not be discussed here. i will wait to hear from white dwarf.

weilandsmith wrote:you are right. the vulturing issue should not be discussed here. i will wait to hear from white dwarf.

i sent you ingame PM. vulturing was just answer on clarkeys question.


CAN you explain me how are your preparing your members for ascension? its interesting. many have raw UP 25k and more, few i saw with 50k, 60k... nice work... its cheaper to ascend than? better to invest to raw and UP planets. but its wery long time, my last ascension was almost 2 years ago... teach me how prepare ppl to ascension with 25k and more UP... (we had similar program, but... till 100m size, your going to growe tham all so high till september?)

mod can close this topic, i have no more questions.

i did not teach or tell them how to build their account. i only told them that the lower UP, the cheaper ascension. but, you also have to balance that with your miner population. the more miners you have, the better your own personal, independent and guaranteed income.

i guess, maybe that's why they have 25K to 50K UP. i saw ascension topic posted by jd3. he has a computation of UU cost for UP during ascension. I posted that in my alliance forum.

they learned by themselves. 25k to 50k UP is the best range for small and middle accounts.

every1 chill please

no1 is wrong and caesar has every right to suggust it, that lets face it its an unlikly occurance but it has happened and i can vouch for my officer as the alliance is new

Rev. Auriel Daniels pls don't try to undermind caesar again, it's good to see people activly on the look out for cheats

we all know its an asgard only alliance rev so you didnt need to put
Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote:
Explanations..
ID: Close, because they recruit new players. A few older players, so older IDs.
Race: It's an Asgard-only alliance.
Size: If they were bigger, they'd apply to the bigger alliances.
Stats: Equal due to size similarities.

software is often just repeated so i would say well done for being on the ball most would have missed this caesar

so all sorted yes, no, maybe