Page 1 of 5

[War Over.] Owned. Vs Malicious Intent.

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:07 am
by Mercury Rising
From the start of this wave I and my alliance members have been provoked by owned. Both on the forums and in game. Tho I admit I dished out some flaming back at them, I do not believe that I started any of it. The people who I feel have provoked myself and my alliance members this wave are kikaz and destroyer.

We have been massed, and tormented and so tonight, Malicious Intent. has has given owned a taste of what we are made of.

MASSINGS:

Violentgray

Lost:

133 billion MS (plus its defense)
977 billion defense
226k spies
449k politicians
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Akhal

Lost:

295 billion MS(plus its defense)
828 billion defense
299k spies
277k politicians

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cimi

Lost:

243 billion MS (plus its defense)
634 billion defense
200k spies
400k+ politicians

------------------------------------------------------------------------

James_g

Lost:

167 billion MS (plus its defense)
494 billion defense
285k spies
600k politicians

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: A few other owned members with smaller defenses were massed during the course of the evening.

Owned. Has lost close to 3 million Men tonight and a fair few trillion Power.

Id like to say to those of you in owned, who were massed with out having massed me, that i am sorry it has to be this way, But Destroyer was the first to provoke and Kikaz was the first to declare the alliance war.


Id like to Thank my alliance members for helping me in the process of the massings.

Personal note to mikgamer: You have previously said that Owned has massed away my fighting spirit....Think Again

Malicious Intent Shall not back down but instead we will continue to stick up for ourselves for as long as we see fit. We expect to be massed in the future but members of owned beware as we will mass you right back.

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:18 am
by kensiky
Massing is all in good fun.

In fact your massing was the second one for me today. So I am having a lot of fun today.

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:07 am
by Mercury Rising
I must say that I'm surprised at your positive attitude kensiky :) . Yes massing is all in fun and I hope the fun continues with out flaming. :-)

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:29 am
by FEARLESS
I'm suprised you guys were able to mass them.. (no offence)

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:30 am
by Feri
lulz
took you long enough ;)

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:25 pm
by Mercury Rising
FEARLESS wrote:I'm suprised you guys were able to mass them.. (no offence)


Coming from someone who surrendered to them

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:45 pm
by kensiky
There goes some more def and attack weapons.

Zuluwarrior Sabbed away 13.47bil in weapons at the cost of 180k spies. But he is not in Malicious Intent. Neither was NCC1701 who massed me first today. Are these ex members of Malicious Intent or am I just a popular guy.

Anyway keep up the good work!

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:46 pm
by Bernie Sanders
:lol:

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 2:26 pm
by Mercury Rising
kensiky wrote:There goes some more def and attack weapons.

Zuluwarrior Sabbed away 13.47bil in weapons at the cost of 180k spies. But he is not in Malicious Intent. Neither was NCC1701 who massed me first today. Are these ex members of Malicious Intent or am I just a popular guy.

Anyway keep up the good work!


Neither of them have been in the alliance nor do they have any relation to us, so I'd say your a very popular guy which is understandable :D

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 4:11 pm
by violentgray
Yeah me too. Second massing today .... lol .... Oh well ... that is why it is a war game. Guess it's time to rebuild for the massings to come last day of the wave anyways

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 4:30 pm
by mikgamer1
This is a new topic why? The current one looks perfectly open and postable in to me...our war never ended...

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:01 am
by Mercury Rising
Mikgamer wrote:This is a new topic why? The current one looks perfectly open and postable in to me...our war never ended...


Well I think the old topic was seeming less interesting, so I thought id make a new one :) And besides, that topic is Owned VS Malicious Intent where as this one is Malicious Intent VS Owned. Completely different unless you include the part 2 :-D

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:45 am
by mikgamer1
Who is the "Owned" you speak of? I think you ment to type "Owned." also...but meh have fun with your double topic...

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:51 am
by Mercury Rising
Mikgamer wrote:Who is the "Owned" you speak of? I think you ment to type "Owned." also...but meh have fun with your double topic...



Well considering kikaz made the first topic, I don't think you can accuse me of making a double topic unless id made the first one in the first place :?

Re: Malicious Intent VS Owned alliance, Part 2

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 6:25 am
by FEARLESS
Mercury Rising wrote:
FEARLESS wrote:I'm suprised you guys were able to mass them.. (no offence)


Coming from someone who surrendered to them


Only because I don't want my alliance to get massed.
However, if it was only me VS. them or if I had known
they weren't going to keep their word, I don't think
I would have surrendered.