what the goau'ld should have done

[Morbius2271]

oh well it is pretty dark i should probably turn it on...

[Lord Ernest]

Fang you have several wrong points;
1. you don't realize thar superor weapons with superior numbers rule all else.
2.clones really rule cause they never run out and they are completely realiable and useful for almost every purpose.
3.Soviets really dominated ww2 along with the americans.

[Fang]

Fang you have several wrong points;
1. you don't realize thar superor weapons with superior numbers rule all else.
2.clones really rule cause they never run out and they are completely realiable and useful for almost every purpose.
3.Soviets really dominated ww2 along with the americans.

1. Germans had superior numbers and Russians had superior numbers (unless you are counting American armament sent to them).
2. Eventually you will run into the cloning problem the Asgard ran into with cloning so many times. Second point it depends on who you are cloning (Baals tend to kill each other unlike Tok'Ra).
3. Soviets did not defeat the Germans, winter did.

[Lord Ernest]

Yeah i'd clone my enemies ,kill them and make them kull.
Germans didn't have superior numbers ,they had superior weapons/tactics than everyone else.
In russia yes but in germany the russians did beat the germans.

[Zeratul]

congratulations on your new ban, Ernest...

you can claim all you want to not own the Supreme E account, but IP check says otherwise...

[Fang]

I meant Germany had superior weapons not numbers my bad. The Russians beat the Germans because at that point Germany knew it had lost the war. Anyway...

[anderos]

Moving on

[The One]

Im back!, anyone miss me? X

[martin the great]

you were gone?

[anderos]

you were gone?

My words exactly

[Fang]

Welcome back .

[Vectra]

I meant Germany had superior weapons not numbers my bad. The Russians beat the Germans because at that point Germany knew it had lost the war. Anyway...

the germans lost because of the simple fact that they were fighting a war with numerous fronts which in turn spread their forces to much which allowed the combined forces of russia, america, britain, canada, the free french, the free polish army ect. russia never in anyway did it single handed, at some points during the war britain supplied russia with aircraft even thougth britain was struggling to survive itself, britain in turn was getting ships and supplies from america. part of the reason germany lost the russia front was that german tanks were a lot better than the russians but took longer to build and were more complex so production was a lot slower the russians however mass produced a cheaper not so good tank which resulted in somthing like a 100-1 ratio this combined with the winter beat the german forces in the east.
in africa it was the british tactics that overwelmed the germans in the deserts. and in the west once britain and america had gained air superiorty this paved the way for the normandy landings again because the german forces had to much land to cover they could not use their forces to their full potential

[hellkaiser]

woah is this gonna be like.....on the test????


besides who want's clones like with their red noses and painted faces and funny little cars that magically fit like 20 of them into it........

[martin the great]

and that is what we call a smart goa'uld(btw i just called all goa'uld dumb)
[spoiler]that was so you understand what the sentence implicated[/spoiler]
[spoiler]m⋅pli⋅cate
   /ˈɪmplɪˌkeɪt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [im-pli-keyt] Show IPA Pronunciation
–verb (used with object), -cat⋅ed, -cat⋅ing.
1. to show to be also involved, usually in an incriminating manner: to be implicated in a crime.
2. to imply as a necessary circumstance, or as something to be inferred or understood.[/spoiler]
thats so you understand the word implicated

damn i cant remember what else i was gonna say
ah well
my insult to the goa'uld should suffice as a post
[spoiler]suf⋅fice
   /səˈfaɪs, -ˈfaɪz/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [suh-fahys, -fahyz] Show IPA Pronunciation
verb, -ficed, -fic⋅ing.
–verb (used without object)
1. to be enough or adequate, as for needs, purposes, etc.
–verb (used with object)
2. to be enough or adequate for; satisfy.[/spoiler]
thats so you understand what suffice means

[Lord Ernest]

One shut up.
Two leave these forums please you no longer belong here.