StarGateWars Forums

cool so whats being said hear is if there are old post that we point out to the mods people can be banded if they are shown to the admin. well that news is awsum allmost half of the people that post hear will be permanently band...

really if it takes u 6 months to get around to banning people. then mabby u have to put another mod on this section of the forum, allso all permanent bans should always be double checked bye another mod and approved.

if the said ofance happened a while ago u should take it on the chin and just think "bugger i should really pic up my game"... simply do your job better.

i dont know what rek has done to deserve a ban but im sorta gessing its not that bad since i havnt hurd any reputations about the subject so that tells me it realy wasnt some thing that bad. and mabby could have been over looked and just marked down as bad moding.

all tho this is just all my thoughts i dont achaly have all the information so my thoughts are only baced on the information i have "my apologies if i dont have the right info"

pianomutt20000 wrote:


Nimras,

The appearance of bias is there, and any reasonable person who looks at this objectively will see bias.

If the warning was issued a month ago, and no ban was issued...then the fault is with the mod, not the player.
Therefore, given how time sensitive this game is......no ban should have been given.

Even if you need to credit a ban, it should be retroactive to the time of the warning...therefore, it would have been finished before this one started.

I am still of the opinion, that the manner in which this was handled was both improper and gives the appearance of bias.

I stand by my assessment,

Bill

I agree fully with Bill ow did I tell you I like your haircut

Um... without going to track down the posts that are probably now modded anyway it does seem odd to ban someone for something that was 'a while back'.

Also, Nimras, while I'm sure you are trying to be unbiased, you are at war with them, so for any major decisions like banning someone, I would suggest that you at least get someone else to look at the decision first or even to do it. At least that way, any appearance of bias is removed. I know that might seem rather annoying to you but it's much easier that way rather than having the accusations and the impressions on people.

This has to be a joke. REK should not be banned!!

Nimras please ban me as well......
No forum for Rek no forum for me

bias i say, bias!!!!

if admin is around and looking here
please think deeper because this "mod" nimras is a joke
always bring more trouble that it must be and creating noise from nothing
he is using this mod to revenge game losing
example is rek here

hmm , wat is the saying , leave dead cows in the ditch , dont go banning ppl for your show of power and then blame it on old warnings.

No wonder ppl get massed for " no reason " .

Section 2: Warning Points
The standard penalty on the SGW forums is the giving of ‘warning points’.

If a user is given three warning points then the user will receive a two week ban. After receiving a third two week ban (nine warning points), the user will receive an indefinite ban.

Warning points are only valid for six months. After which time they will no longer count towards possible future bans. Two week bans stay on a user’s record for one year.

A user can only return from an indefinite ban after contacting the Ombudsperson and arranging a meeting with a forum admin at which the user will present their case for being unbanned. The user will also present two respected members of the community to vouch for the reinstatement.

the rules are there, what I do not know is how many bans Rek has had, whether or any of the bans are out of date, or whether or not any of the existing bans have already been over ruled and not removed


please give detials

If he didnt get banned over a month ago wy ban him now....