Page 1 of 5
The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:26 pm
by Osi
Over 40,000 police and troops in all, the shutdown of both Baltimore and Washington D.C., and a cost of over 150 million dollars. Bush was blasted for using 4,000 guards and 42 million for his second, which was during a period of economic stability. to top it off He's following Lincoln's footsteps, a figure which he in no way resembles, and has even decided to us the bible on which Lincoln was sworn in. This is a coronation not an inaugural event. They might as well build a grand temple complex around the Lincoln memorial and crave Old Abe out of his marble throne so Obama can ascend and take his media appointed crown. Heck maybe we can drag the Pope over, and a few foreign potentates to seal the image forever in our minds.
On another note, once the bleeding heart media realize they have no one to criticize since they've gotten their messiah in office they'll run out of stories and material and hopefully burn themselves alive on prime time tv. I'd watch.
Oh and don't quote Wikipedia on this one, their facts are... slanted
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:56 pm
by Juliette
Yeah.. I was wondering about this one too.. is Obama secretly being crowned God-Emperor of the West?

I mean.. all this.. next thing we know, they'll be ordering the construction of a mighty new Presidential Palace in the majestic shapes of the past.

Though I would love to see a Cathedral of Light revisited.

Obama's also calling upon all kinds of controversial minority figures, so as to represent the 'victory' of the minorities, their self-control at this dreadful moment in history.
We stand upon the edge of the Abyss. I pray to God we don't fall right into it..
I may be a fool.. but the threat from the libertarian democratic freedom militarists is very real. Common man needs to realise the danger which they face from this Messianic Empire that is being formed in the wake of the counter-reaction to the strict government we've seen across the world in the past decade.
What we need is someone with a brain to take care of God's Green Earth. We need volunteers. Not this God-Emperor of the West.
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:58 pm
by Osi
We need an Augustus not a Caligula
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:06 pm
by Juliette
Patty Hughes wrote:We need an Augustus not a Caligula
My point exactly.

(Though it might be somewhat obscured by my vague rhetoric..)
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:19 pm
by Osi
-would love to see an Obama-tron attempt to justify the excess-
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:24 pm
by Kit-Fox
Well I'm in no way justifing what hes doing, but he did win. Is he not allowed to celebrate that fact along with his followers publically??
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:30 pm
by Deaths_Rider
i agree that it is rediculous excess but that is how he got in why expect it to stop when he gets there
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:42 pm
by ramen07
"THE LAWSUITS:
Among Berg's arguments is that if Obama was born in Kenya, U.S. Immigration law in effect in 1961 barred Obama from U.S. citizenship at birth because his father was a Kenyan citizen and his mother, although a U.S. citizen, was not a resident of the U.S. for at least FIVE years following her 14th birthday. Obama's mother was only 18 at the time of Obama's birth, and thereby barred - by U.S. Immigration law - from passing U.S. citizenship to her child Obama -- even though she was a U.S. citizen.
See page 6 of the legal brief.
Donofrio's primary legal argument is that Obama could never be a constitutional "natural born" citizen simply because his father was a legal citizen of another nation, i.e. a foreign national of Kenya, regardless of place of birth. See page 16 of the brief.
BIRTH CERTIFICATE: "Certificate" or "Certification" of Live Birth?
Mr. Obama has only proffered a discredited 2007 computer-generated, unsigned, "Certification of Live Birth" that is suspected of being a forgery.
This “short-form” document is NOT the same as an original vault copy birth certificate (i.e., a “Certificate of Live Birth”) as it does not bear a sworn certification of an attendant physician or contain other vital birth information such as hospital location, mother’s age, etc. which are necessary to verify the full citizenship status of a person, i.e., a "natural born" OR "naturalized" U.S. citizen.
"Naturalized" U.S. citizens, such as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger are NOT eligible to become U.S. President.
INDONESIAN SCHOOL RECORDS
Obama's Indonesian school document indicates Obama was a citizen of Indonesia. Until 2006, Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship, meaning that because Obama, as a minor, was legally acknowledged as an Indonesian citizen by his parents, he was temporarily stripped of his U.S. citizenship at that time. Under U.S. Immigration law, Obama could have regained his citizenship as an adult, but only as a "naturalized" citizen, ineligible to hold the Office of President.
SWORN AFFIDAVITS
Read the sworn affidavits of Bishop Ron McRae and Kweli Shuhubia (second affidavit includes partial transcript of an audio recording of Obama's grandmother stating she attended Obama's birth in KENYA.) "
http://wethepeoplefoundation.org/obama/really now. good thing i didnt vote for an illegal president.

Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:56 pm
by Osi
I know, we have a pauper King ascending to the American Presidency and the medial wants to bronze his fecal matter and use it as paper weights.
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:04 pm
by ramen07
Patty Hughes wrote:I know, we have a pauper King ascending to the American Presidency and the medial wants to bronze his fecal matter and use it as paper weights.
pauper king.
not really the term i would use. i do believe he is getting the presidency by illegitimate means, and should be brought to justice. oh i forgot to mention- the supreme court is choosing to overlook the citizenship thing.
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:15 am
by I Am Thor
This is old but I'm posting in here anyway because I agree. Hussein should have never won, this was simply a pity vote because, hes black. Now I know, that sounds extremely racist of me, but hear me out. Whites were looking for a way to pat themselves on the back, liberals were looking for someone to beat Hiliary, lo and behold, here comes Hussein, who won a senatorship on a technicality because the Republican candidate dropped out due to a nasty divorce, which the Obama campaign publicized. Their next candidate, Mike Dikta, didn't want to run because he'd lose out on the sports commentator salary from ESPN. The vote for Barack Hussein Obama was nothing more than a pity vote. His entire campaign was the word change but not once did he say what he was going to change.
Stem cell research, he wants to perfect human cloning so he clone fetuses for the purpose of stem cell research and make it a federal offense for any women to carry a cloned fetus to full term.
Bringing back Partial Birth Abortions, that means mutilating it in child birth just because some teenager doesn't want to take responsibility for it.
Redistribution of wealth, a fundamental communist ideal. To cite that policy and call it his own, he quoted Karl Marx.
Already said if World War III breaks out, hes siding with the Muslims.
Thank God I didn't vote for this clown. Actually, pretty soon, it may change to Thank Allah.
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:57 pm
by Thriller
Lol yah, this little shindig was expensive, maybe he should get corporate sponsorship?
At least it's not bush .... NEVER AGAIN, americans.
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:03 pm
by Cole
I Am Thor wrote:This is old but I'm posting in here anyway because I agree. Hussein should have never won, this was simply a pity vote because, hes black. Now I know, that sounds extremely racist of me, but hear me out. Whites were looking for a way to pat themselves on the back, liberals were looking for someone to beat Hiliary, lo and behold, here comes Hussein, who won a senatorship on a technicality because the Republican candidate dropped out due to a nasty divorce, which the Obama campaign publicized. Their next candidate, Mike Dikta, didn't want to run because he'd lose out on the sports commentator salary from ESPN. The vote for Barack Hussein Obama was nothing more than a pity vote. His entire campaign was the word change but not once did he say what he was going to change.
Stem cell research, he wants to perfect human cloning so he clone fetuses for the purpose of stem cell research and make it a federal offense for any women to carry a cloned fetus to full term.
Bringing back Partial Birth Abortions, that means mutilating it in child birth just because some teenager doesn't want to take responsibility for it.
Redistribution of wealth, a fundamental communist ideal. To cite that policy and call it his own, he quoted Karl Marx.
Already said if World War III breaks out, hes siding with the Muslims.
Thank God I didn't vote for this clown. Actually, pretty soon, it may change to Thank Allah.
A vote for PITY, do you realize what crap you are saying? Political correctness for some voters probably, but pity come on! Don't make your triple K bling bling too obvious by assuming voting a black man can only be pity. Because black people are ohh so not deserving a vote for their skills and programs!
*facepalms*
Oh my god Barack HUSSEIN (zomg his name is hussein hence he's evil like Sadam ahhh run for your lives!!!) Obama got a polemical second name, hence he's a muslim, hence an islamist and going to make USA a mess. And convert all to radical islam. And also to communism! Boo! Cry me a river, paranoid mastermind! XD
Now we got the new hybrid Bin Laden/Stalin run for your lives we are all doomed ahhhhh!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjxzmaXAg9EI see that we got another one poorly aware person like from this vid, on these forums...

What goes around comes around, that's all what your post deserved as a reply!

Sorry to other people for my lack of seriousness and structure, but seriously such posts don't deserve a serious reply, at all.

They only deserve excessive irony as it's sufficient to kill arguments from it, so much false and overexcessive they are.
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:53 pm
by I Am Thor
LegendaryApophis wrote:A vote for PITY, do you realize what crap you are saying? Political correctness for some voters probably, but pity come on! Don't make your triple K bling bling too obvious by assuming voting a black man can only be pity. Because black people are ohh so not deserving a vote for their skills and programs!
*facepalms*
Pity vote, or a feel good vote, whatever you want to call it. Fact remains, people voted for him solely on the fact that he's black. In fact, in the last two months, the percentage of people dissatisfied with his job so far rose from 15-26%. Thats faster than the rate of people dissatisfied with Bush in his second term.
LegendaryApophis wrote:Oh my god Barack HUSSEIN (zomg his name is hussein hence he's evil like Sadam ahhh run for your lives!!!) Obama got a polemical second name, hence he's a muslim, hence an islamist and going to make USA a mess. And convert all to radical islam. And also to communism! Boo! Cry me a river, paranoid mastermind! XD
Now we got the new hybrid Bin Laden/Stalin run for your lives we are all doomed ahhhhh!!!!!
Okay, that first part made me laugh

Paranoid mastermind? Hmm....never been called that before, I suppose if I started smoking pot, I'd become Steven Hyde

My point with that was picking a religious side in a world war is a dangerous thing. America doesn't support Israel because of its official religion, we support Israel for their right to exist as a country, the same right our forefathers fought for.
LegendaryApophis wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjxzmaXAg9E
I see that we got another one poorly aware person like from this vid, on these forums...

On the contrary, I am more aware than most people are my age.
LegendaryApophis wrote:What goes around comes around, that's all what your post deserved as a reply!

Sorry to other people for my lack of seriousness and structure, but seriously such posts don't deserve a serious reply, at all.

They only deserve excessive irony as it's sufficient to kill arguments from it, so much false and overexcessive they are.
No comment.
Re: The Audacity of the Obama Inaguration
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:39 pm
by Thriller
NO, you have absolutely no idea what your talking about. The fact you believe people voted for obama be out of pity shows that your extremely naive. You should listen more, research things more, and not expect the brain dribble you spew out to be taken as a point for sensible discussion.