StarGateWars Forums

See the Moral Decay signature of mine. Some members of this forum asked us to remove it. I ask the admins/mods that is it acceptable or not. My opinion:

Lord Dexx wrote:About the sig: I have seen sigs about drugs, girlies, wars, death, deads, killings, murders, monsters, zombies and many worse things than this.. So, I think that baby is zombie or monster or something like that, and there are millions of sigs on this forum which contains such and similar characters. I don't really care about who likes it and who does not. However, I'll contact admins or mods to ask the sig is acceptable or not. It's their job to decide and I will not remove it cause some members dislike it.

I, personally, will not judge or answer your thread's question, as I feel there are those of greater compatibility for that.
But let me ask you a question, Dexx.

Would you keep the signature, if more and more people would speak out against it, but the Admins/Mods allow it?
You cannot deny the shocking and provocative nature of the imagery. Suits the name "moral decay" quite well.



I too am curious what the final word on this will be.

If the forums managements will tel that the sig is acceptable than people who can't stand things like this shouldn't visit the forums. I have been offended by many sigs on this forum mostly those who represented a political side or showed a political sign, but I never said that please remove that sig, because it's not my job but the management's and because I accept that he has different style, views, or opinion about politics, life, love, games or about anything.. And if someone is offended so much that he can't live with that feeling anymore than s/he should leave this forum and well, the whole internet I think.

Using the correct procedure of taking the issue to Omsbubman would get you a faster response, or simply messaging all 3 admins with the issue. I have posted this thread in the admin section for the 3 forum admins to discuss and I'll post the outcome for you.

Thanx, I'll wait for the answer.

Sorry for the long wait.

The administration can find no fault, as far as the rules are concerned, with this sig. Only this it can be accused of is poor taste and that is subjectable.

I advise anyone offended to set any user wearing the sig to "foe" or follow the directions in this thread to adblock/siggy kill it.
viewtopic.php?f=71&t=113649


As a brief explination to all involved, Dexx makes a good arguement in the fact several other sigs are generally considered far worse, and and zombie/demon/etc having not been a "baby" would never get a second glance. To bann this sig would bring about the removal of alot of generally acceptable sigs. The child content may be distasteful or shocking, but it doesnt break any rules.

*Filters sig*

*Moves on*

Thank you the answer and to clear the situation admins!

when looking at the top of the image, it rather looks like the one on the left is a doll... from our memory, babies usually dont have such patterns on head, but dolls do (to simulate baby hair)

Zeratul wrote:when looking at the top of the image, it rather looks like the one on the left is a doll... from our memory, babies usually dont have such patterns on head, but dolls do (to simulate baby hair)

You didn't *really* expect it to be a real baby, right?? I mean.. the zerglings, the disemboweling.. you almost sound disappointed.

we did not...

that fact should also calm down a few of those not liking it...

*disembowels a zergling for the fun of it*

Lord Dexx wrote:Thank you the answer and to clear the situation admins!

well i like the sig.....it is a very good if not artistic portrayal of decaying morals.....

I think in a sense that its misused, abused,take a picture of smoeone holding a gun to a dog you would think thats animal cruelty,in a same way its acts of human cruelty have to STOP!!