Page 1 of 2

Multi?

Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:06 am
by Valkyrus
My officer Andariel has a private war with someone that started taking his planets. Now his problem is that his enemy has probably used a dummy account to steal and abandon a planet, and the next thing he did was send a PM to my officer about the losses that my officer had by stealing that planet. The other possibility is that a no-stats account suddenly came out of the bleu and massed my officer's planet and stole it and abandonned it... -.-

The message he sent was:
Planet Defences Destroyed(300) 156,545 my calculations.. (sorry if they are a little off) all your planets are monsterous... 80,000,000 for 1 planet defence.. 156,545 * 80,000,000 = 12,523,600,000,000 so you lost around 12tril.. it cost me around 2tril to do it and because mobile planet defences are cheaper then defences themselves... ill say around 9tril you lost...
im going to continue to take all your planets and abandon them until you surrender to me. take it easy =)

My officer's enemy ID: 102207
His possible multi-account: 1903275

Logs of ~Jason~:

[spoiler]05:57 ~Jason~ 20454 lost. 15 0 4,379 11,954,670,000 12,762,240,000
05:57 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 439 14,454,000,000 13,178,400,000
05:57 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 471 14,597,640,000 14,149,440,000
05:57 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 914 17,582,760,000 13,733,280,000
05:57 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 439 18,183,900,000 13,178,400,000
05:57 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 453 19,515,720,000 13,594,560,000
05:57 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 386 19,386,240,000 11,589,362,400
05:56 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 471 20,461,350,000 14,149,440,000
05:56 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 840 24,219,900,000 12,623,520,000
05:55 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 457 23,860,200,000 13,733,280,000
05:55 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 860 26,934,120,000 12,900,960,000
05:55 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 434 26,322,600,000 13,039,680,000
05:55 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 416 26,929,080,000 12,484,800,000
05:54 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 1,372 26,003,880,000 20,586,857,200
05:54 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 708 25,132,380,000 21,265,544,800
05:54 ~Jason~ Attack defended 15 0 716 28,873,020,000 21,491,774,000[/spoiler]

Logs of Second:

[spoiler]06:41 ~RISE~AGAINST~ 39317 lost. 15 0 2,869 7,832,370,000 8,078,601,960
06:41 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 185 8,520,660,000 5,559,343,686
06:41 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 243 9,891,000,000 7,309,478,732
06:41 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 266 9,940,770,000 7,996,999,920
06:41 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 250 11,095,830,000 7,507,387,680
06:41 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 252 11,463,300,000 7,588,989,720
06:40 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 261 12,199,320,000 7,833,795,840
06:40 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 255 13,055,850,000 7,670,591,760
06:40 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 252 13,194,090,000 7,588,989,720
06:40 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 258 14,509,350,000 7,752,193,800
06:39 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 244 14,564,550,000 7,344,183,600
06:39 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 277 15,152,400,000 8,323,408,080
06:39 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 258 17,433,900,000 7,752,193,800
06:39 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 261 16,553,700,000 7,833,795,840
06:39 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 261 18,217,200,000 7,833,795,840
06:38 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 139 17,829,630,000 4,193,822,490
06:38 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 390 20,379,780,000 5,857,916,797
06:38 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 261 19,284,120,000 7,833,795,840
06:37 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 250 20,191,230,000 7,507,387,680
06:37 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 266 20,933,370,000 7,996,999,920
06:37 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 266 22,607,790,000 7,996,999,920
06:36 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 277 23,172,480,000 8,323,408,080
06:36 ~RISE~AGAINST~ Attack defended 15 0 230 24,727,830,000 3,461,507,712[/spoiler]

These are just probabilities, I should know what time he sent the message, but I find the message rather disturbing, and the other account started 30 mins later, and my officer is at school having a hard time :/

Sincerely, and thank you for your attention
Valkyrus

Re: Multi?

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:51 am
by dastupy
bump for me boy

Re: Multi?

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:39 am
by Ĕɱƿŷ
No purrs from this kitty.

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:02 am
by Valkyrus
I just received following PM by XTKiller (ID:1930260):

Hello, I am writing you because I just came across you post on the sgw forum about a possible multi.

My officer was massed by ~Jason~ and then raided by ~RISE~AGAINST~

This attack is odd because of the situation that has presented it self. ~RISE~AGAINST~ is a very small player and had know way of knowing how many uu my officer had out and his strike force could have never gotten through my officers defense. ~RISE~AGAINST~ army size at the start of the raid was around 700k and right now it is near that same size. The uu he raided is gone. I am thinking he did this with the help of ~Jason~. Now I do not know if this account is connected to ~Jason~ but it is just a little strange how he massed my officer and then ~RISE~AGAINST~ starts to raid.

Any information you may have that could be helpfull is greatly appreciated.

XTKiller


I guess this is just another weird coincidence...

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:13 am
by Colton
Looks like someone's getting the ban hammer :lol:
I like the fact they both use "~"'s, which I can't remember the name of at the moment.. :?

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:23 am
by Valkyrus
Lol, now you mention it, I can't name it either :smt105

Anyways, I hope he gets banned

Sincerely,
Valkyrus

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:59 am
by renegadze
~ is the "tilda" symbol ;-)

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:03 am
by Colton
renegadze wrote:~ is the "tilda" symbol ;-)

Ahh that's it, the Tilde :lol:

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:34 am
by Valkyrus
I didn't know, I just use it as approximately :)

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:46 am
by The White Rider
I messaged ~Jason~ asking why he massed our smallest player, his response was...
~Jason~ wrote:Because he had 3.5mil uu out so I massed him so my friend could raid him.. Got a problem with that?

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:49 am
by Valkyrus
The White Rider wrote:I messaged ~Jason~ asking why he massed our smallest player, his response was...
~Jason~ wrote:Because he had 3.5mil uu out so I massed him so my friend could raid him.. Got a problem with that?

Lol, too bad his friend still has the same army :/

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:24 am
by muffafuffin
seems like a pretty logical answer to asking why he would do that. so many reasons why he would raid that UU then not have it anymore but not alot of proof for why he would be a multi other than you not liking that they work together it seems.

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:28 am
by Colton
Better safe than sorry :wink:
Admin'll check them out and if they're not multies, t'was just an honest accusation mistake 8)

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:27 pm
by dastupy
Valkyrus wrote:
The White Rider wrote:I messaged ~Jason~ asking why he massed our smallest player, his response was...
~Jason~ wrote:Because he had 3.5mil uu out so I massed him so my friend could raid him.. Got a problem with that?

Lol, too bad his friend still has the same army :/


He could have also raided it while he massed him and sent the uu to the friend
so i don't know tbh :o

Re: Multi?

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 4:08 pm
by The White Rider
dastupy wrote:
Valkyrus wrote:
The White Rider wrote:I messaged ~Jason~ asking why he massed our smallest player, his response was...
~Jason~ wrote:Because he had 3.5mil uu out so I massed him so my friend could raid him.. Got a problem with that?

Lol, too bad his friend still has the same army :/


He could have also raided it while he massed him and sent the uu to the friend
so i don't know tbh :o

Raids started 9 minutes after the massing was finished, and for the record, I am only posting this information here to have it checked out. I know there are plenty of perfectly honest explanations to this scenario and I am sure it will turn out that way in the end. But as there seems to be other players also questioning this pair, I thought it only right to post any new information for helping the admin sort this all out.