I don't know if this is technically a 'bug', or more so a loophole in the system.
Years ago the brokering system ingame did not allow brokers to be placed for resources that a player did not have. Ie. you could not initiate a trade for 7K of your turns for 3.5 trill naq if you only held 300 turns.
I experienced this today (if it's too small, click it and it should get larger):
I don't think that is really supposed to happen, or if it is, could it be changed? Both brokers were set at the same time for more turns than I held, and I had to reject a trade thereby allowing someone to potentially get hit for naq I refused to take during a proposed trade.
Maybe there is a way to prevent two brokers from being set at the same time (maybe delay each broker by at least 5 seconds after the last)? Or if it already is delayed, why did I get brokers for more turns than I held? I'm pretty sure this isn't supposed to happen, as I cannot accept them both.
Brokering bug?
- Spacey
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 7426
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:00 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: five steps behind where I need to be
Brokering bug?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

"We few. We happy few. We band of brothers.
For those who shed their blood with me today
will always be my brother."


- MaxSterling
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:32 pm
- Alliance: The Dark Dominium
- ID: 83707
- Alternate name(s): Naq Daddy, The guy that just stole your naq.
- Location: In ur bank... stealin ur nakz.
Re: Brokering bug?
Actually, when you reject a broker, don't you have a certain amount of time to recover the goods... so in essence they're not in the open until the timer to recover the goods runs out.
Looks like trader 1 lucked out by milliseconds.
Looks like trader 1 lucked out by milliseconds.


Spoiler

-
Sarevok
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: Brokering bug?
Also, the trades maybe set for resources you don't have, but you will not be able to accept these trades without the resources.
You weren't the initiator, so you haven't put any resources up
You weren't the initiator, so you haven't put any resources up
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> anotheri am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin
-
BenjaminMS
- Tollan
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:20 am
- Alliance: ~Leaf Village~
- Race: Balancer
- ID: 1907529
- Alternate name(s): TUHD (Bioware forums)
- Location: Stuck between real life and the other end of a Stargate
Re: Brokering bug?
Still, if player A brokers B for X turns, and X turns would bring B over the limit, the system kicks in, or at least it SHOULD. I´ve experience with it.
So yes, this is a bug
So yes, this is a bug

Currently ingame known as BenMS
Goblin: "I like your boots."
Sorcerer: "That's because you don't have any. The emotion is called envy."
Spoiler
/smile at the green grass,
smile at the sun,
smile at the roses,
before they're gone/
BenjaminMS - 'A thief of roses'
smile at the sun,
smile at the roses,
before they're gone/
BenjaminMS - 'A thief of roses'
[TL] Renegadze zegt:
yeah definately makes more sense you hitting
and I have no DMU as you keep robbing it
MERC 1 zegt:
shuld not leave it out
any way you cant prove nothing
[TL] Michael/BenjaminMS zegt:
meh Rene, just find a few 0-def farms with 300+ tril DMU out...
MERC 1 zegt:
cool you two take it then i will hit you
- Clarkey
- Multi Hunter
- Posts: 14366
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:23 am
- ID: 0
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Brokering bug?
BenjaminMS wrote:Still, if player A brokers B for X turns, and X turns would bring B over the limit, the system kicks in, or at least it SHOULD. I´ve experience with it.
So yes, this is a bug
I think you are wrong in this particular issue.
Trader 1 brokered Spacey 2.5t naq in exchange for 5,000 of Spacey's ATs. Therefore Trader 1 receiving the ATs. As long as he had under 5k himself then it is fine.
Trader 2 brokered Spacey 2.5t naq in exchange for 5,000 of Spacey's ATs. Therefore Trader 2 receiving the ATs. As long as he had under 5k himself then it is fine.
No-one in this case would have been over the limit as long as both traders 1 & 2 had under 5k ATs.
-
Sarevok
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: Brokering bug?
Clarkey is right.
See, thing is, you could accept either broker, and they system can not tell which one it is you will accept (you may have a bias against/for an alliance for example)
Since their offering you 2.5T Naq, for 5k of your turns, you can accept one, but trying to accept the other will not work
See, thing is, you could accept either broker, and they system can not tell which one it is you will accept (you may have a bias against/for an alliance for example)
Since their offering you 2.5T Naq, for 5k of your turns, you can accept one, but trying to accept the other will not work
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> anotheri am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin
-
Sarevok
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: Brokering bug?
Except if they were brokered when he had 4999-4997(normal collection), then accepted another broker for a smaller amount (or was sent), then these brokers would still be valid, just not acceptable
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> anotheri am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin
- Clarkey
- Multi Hunter
- Posts: 14366
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:23 am
- ID: 0
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Brokering bug?
Tetrismonkey wrote:Very very true, but judging by the time on the broker: 8;34, and he posted at 8:58, that only leaves 1 turn change, 4 ATs to be accumulated. Meaning, hes 398 ATs over, erm 394 ATs over at the time the brokers were done.
Yes but what could also be true is that he has Personal Attacks. <<< Do not count towards the 10k limit.
- andell
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1582
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 8:57 am
- Alliance: HVE
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 0
Re: Brokering bug?
don't think this has that much with Spaceys problem but. i don't know if it's a bug but sometimes when i broker someone the brokers doubles....
again sorry for hijacking but i thought it was smarter to just post it here then creating a new topic.
again sorry for hijacking but i thought it was smarter to just post it here then creating a new topic.

Sparta Prag-supporter: "Liverpool came here with 4000 men and ran, AIK Stockholm came with 500 and fought"
AIK-WE ARE EVERYWHERE!
- minisaiyan
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2920
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:00 am
- Race: DieHard
- Alternate name(s): CJL
Hatebreeder
Aesthetics of Hate - Location: At a concert headbanging
Re: Brokering bug?
by the looks of these brokers, they are askinf gor 5k of spacey's turns :/ the trade maker's good's traded are the 2.5tril right?

- Clarkey
- Multi Hunter
- Posts: 14366
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:23 am
- ID: 0
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Brokering bug?
Aesthetics of Hate wrote:by the looks of these brokers, they are askinf gor 5k of spacey's turns :/ the trade maker's good's traded are the 2.5tril right?
Yes that's been covered already.
- minisaiyan
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2920
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:00 am
- Race: DieHard
- Alternate name(s): CJL
Hatebreeder
Aesthetics of Hate - Location: At a concert headbanging
Re: Brokering bug?
so of course he wouldnt go above the cap coz he's getting rid of them. and as he has 5k turns, both brokers are legit. I dont see what people are saying is the bug here

-
Sarevok
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: Brokering bug?
But we can't confirm this so we need to wait, and make sure it isn't (as this could be a bad bug, allowing people to hold more then 10k turns, or if it also affected UU, buy more then the allowed limit)
andell, are you only clicking once? Or do you sometimes double click? Also, try just having resources out you need for the trade, this'll stop it from making another
andell, are you only clicking once? Or do you sometimes double click? Also, try just having resources out you need for the trade, this'll stop it from making another
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> anotheri am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin
- Clarkey
- Multi Hunter
- Posts: 14366
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:23 am
- ID: 0
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Brokering bug?
Sarevok wrote:But we can't confirm this so we need to wait, and make sure it isn't (as this could be a bad bug, allowing people to hold more then 10k turns, or if it also affected UU, buy more then the allowed limit)
WHERE is this possible bug allowing peope to hold over 10k ATs come in to it?
There are 2 traders making trades with Spacey in here!
-
Sarevok
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: Brokering bug?
yeh, both offering him 5k AT for 2.5T naq. But he has >5k At already (unless some are personal, which isn't confirmed yet. If they are personal and non-transferable, then this wouldn't be putting him over the limit and there would be no bug)
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> anotheri am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin




