Page 1 of 1

Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:15 pm
by Crayton
I am calling LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos out of their hole.

DATE
This war starts 09-10-2009 and lasts one week, if they would like to extend it, I am game, just post the prefered finishing date here.

WHY
supreme ethos had alot of naq out and a huge defence, left naq out over long periods and made himself a decent farming target, he got massed for his naq. He then called upon LiQuiD AKA who is supposed to be his handler? who knows, who cares, he had enough naq out over long periods, I took it and his defence, which was very high killable, not my problem.

They tried to use LiQuiD AKA as a threat, but clearly did not and still do not know we are NAP with Mayhem, so i have no problems with Mayhem, many good guys in there, but i dont think that ricos roughneck's or Mayhem's members need to pay and waste time for supreme ethos shortfall in gameplay because he has a buddy that wants to do something about it.

I am taking the initiative to deal with this situation as per LiQuiD AKA, but i am not going to beat around the bush about it, if you want a war, you got it, i am not going to be held on a threat leash, especially by you.

LiQuiD AKA PM: "i am quite prepared to do something this situation. by your tone, it seems ill have to."

Dont worry, you dont need to put in the effort....i will bring it to you instead.

All external involvement will be met with supportive alliance aggression from which ever side needs to support their members due to external involvement, please keep this war clean and among these three accounts only, play clean.

GL, lets see if your accounts are as fast as your mouths.

Waiting for your response on this Vendetta

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:22 am
by DarkAngel666
GL to all 3..... but obviously I shake my pom poms for Crayton.

GO Crayton :lol:

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:21 am
by harchester
Good luck Crayton buddy

i would like to say Ricos Roughnecks will not get involved in this
Crayton will be the only one guy hitting both of you

None of Ricos will enter this except Crayton
We Expect LiQuiD AKA alaince to do this too

Harch

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:24 am
by ~Snipez~
go crayton :-D gl to the other two accounts

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:42 am
by Stampeda
DarkAngel666 wrote:GL to all 3..... but obviously I shake my pom poms for Crayton.

GO Crayton :lol:


damn tho the "pom poms" was "porn porns" ! :lol:

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:51 am
by moses
Crayton Crayton hes are man if he cant do it know one can lol

good luck mate and have fun ;)

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:20 am
by MaxSterling
Good luck Crayton. I agree with you... if they leave naq out, don't cry if people mass the defense to get it. Everyone is fair game no matter what war they're in if they don't bank their naq.

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:56 am
by Noobert
Killing a defense simply for naquadah can be perceived as a random massing, so good luck to you.

I don't care how high it is, still wrong to mass the defense down to zero for a bit of naquadah..

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:02 am
by MaxSterling
Noobert wrote:I don't care how high it is, still wrong to mass the defense down to zero for a bit of naquadah..

I agree with that. I only mini mass to get the naq. To me, massing is a waste of ATs. I'd rather get naq or UU in exchange for those turns.
I have however massed a defense down to zero when raiding UU... unfortunately that's the nature of that attack.

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:04 am
by R8
Crayton wrote:I am calling LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos out of their hole.

DATE
This war starts 09-10-2009 and lasts one week, if they would like to extend it, I am game, just post the prefered finishing date here.

WHY
supreme ethos had alot of naq out and a huge defence, left naq out over long periods and made himself a decent farming target, he got massed for his naq. He then called upon LiQuiD AKA who is supposed to be his handler? who knows, who cares, he had enough naq out over long periods, I took it and his defence, which was very high killable, not my problem.

They tried to use LiQuiD AKA as a threat, but clearly did not and still do not know we are NAP with Mayhem, so i have no problems with Mayhem, many good guys in there, but i dont think that ricos roughneck's or Mayhem's members need to pay and waste time for supreme ethos shortfall in gameplay because he has a buddy that wants to do something about it.

I am taking the initiative to deal with this situation as per LiQuiD AKA, but i am not going to beat around the bush about it, if you want a war, you got it, i am not going to be held on a threat leash, especially by you.

LiQuiD AKA PM: "i am quite prepared to do something this situation. by your tone, it seems ill have to."

Dont worry, you dont need to put in the effort....i will bring it to you instead.

All external involvement will be met with supportive alliance aggression from which ever side needs to support their members due to external involvement, please keep this war clean and among these three accounts only, play clean.

GL, lets see if your accounts are as fast as your mouths.

Waiting for your response on this Vendetta





that does not sound right!!. what he handles his naq, his account, his a$$. lol :lol:

i have massed defences down for naq but i hate it when its like 4or 5 trill and you build up trying to mass it then some ese comes along takes the naq and you end up with nothing!!

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:21 pm
by qacol
Good luck- and as a side note Crayton is a friend of mine and a long time officer. I had to dump CRAYTON because of my alliance.

~Qacol~
Crayton fan club

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:52 pm
by ~TheJoker~
go Crayton

Re: Crayton VS LiQuiD AKA & supreme ethos

Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:41 pm
by Crayton
This surmounted to nothing, nana, squat, zero. okay i'm out of words.

I am sorry but these two guys have recieved the thread twice via pm ingame now and nothing has come of it, they are clearly ignoring it and keeping it on the low side so nothing happens, i am not going to fight this, if thats what they want, then so be it, a message would have been cool though like, "hey we are not waring you".

Okay you two guys should have probally not messaged me to begin with, I was expecting some kind of a fight really, a bit dissapointed in you two. If a roughneck hits ethos for naq, dont complain again, you guys have had the opportunity to do something and wasted this opportunity.

All respect to Roughnecks, Qacol and Mayhem, thanks for the support guys, and thanks to those that posted, sorry we were unable to have a decent outsome via war, this will have to do though as they clearly refuse to accept my challenge.

Good Gaming,
Crayton

please close thread.