StarGateWars Forums

And this is why I dont come to the forums, there is no freedom of speech. If the mods dont want you to read it, then you will never read it.

And why are DDE allowed to mod their own threads, biased or what?

how do you know a DDE mod took care of the thread?

Seaborgium wrote:how do you know a DDE mod took care of the thread?

He does not know. He assumes

this post

viewtopic.php?f=135&t=153274

removed from this thread

viewtopic.php?f=68&t=151827

And I merely pointed out that they were only allowing surrenders for a week in the title and that was 3 weeks ago, though the rule I broke wasnt pointed out to me.

the thread states only surrenders, acceptance and a couple of other things are allowed in that thread.

i agree with jack's idea of no freedom of speech, but you are completely wrong generaloneill, your post is still possible to read, just it did not belong where it was de to the specific nature of the thread. if u had read the first post you would have known that.

generaloneill wrote:And this is why I dont come to the forums, there is no freedom of speech. If the mods dont want you to read it, then you will never read it.

And why are DDE allowed to mod their own threads, biased or what?

Assuming makes an ass out of U and..... well yourself.

You assumed a DDE member modded that post..... fact is..... you are WRONG.

You want to talk biased????

Ok how about this....

generaloneill wrote:And why are DDE allowed to mod their own threads, biased or what?

A non biased comment/question would read....

"And why are alliances allowed to mod their own threads, biased or what?"

But no, you chose to single out one group, based on an assumption, one that was wrong might I add, and you feel the need to complain about bias.

mmm.. I dont know what post..

but shouldn't this have been placed in the ombusmans office, not dumped.

Forum users have a right to complain, unfounded or not.

temptress wrote:mmm.. I dont know what post..

but shouldn't this have been placed in the ombusmans office, not dumped.

Forum users have a right to complain, unfounded or not.

If generaloneill wishes to complain to the Ombudsman then it shall be placed in the Oms corner.

However, if generaloneill is only questioning why it was moved then this is the right place.

its not dumped...

sorry

no problem...

calling the thread pitiful is in no way an insult. Generaloneill did have a valid point when he posted, his post was not spam, as opposed to the followed up post by deni, would you not agree?
I think to get a fair point of view this should be sent to the ombudsman's corner though if generaloneill agrees.

Rocky

ROCKY wrote:calling the thread pitiful is in no way an insult. Generaloneill did have a valid point when he posted, his post was not spam, as opposed to the followed up post by deni, would you not agree?
I think to get a fair point of view this should be sent to the ombudsman's corner though if generaloneill agrees.

Rocky

The thread is about people putting forward their surrenders and the HC of the relevant alliances responding to that. Nothing else. Therefore generaloneill's post ALONG WITH deni's post were both moved.

The post was moved to the public dump therefore still viewable and postable by the public.

Why would the ombudsman get involved when no-one actually received a warning?