StarGateWars Forums

SICK and TWISTED scum bags of the highest order!

not naming names, but in the past as well as more recently i have made statements that our leaders and the elite are satanists and very sick people, i provided links showing these people making satanic hand signals only for people here to rationalize it by saying words to the affect of "its a joke, nothing more" or simply brush off what i show them by laughing at me or the source instead of investigating the claims.

well, here's something else that's now becoming mainstream for certain individuals here to rationalize:

http://www.infowars.com/the-real-sicko-movie/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... iland.html

dirty maggot scumbags!


understand, ALL of our leaders are sick, twisted, evil, treasonous scum who do not get to be leader UNLESS they are in the club of the sick, twisted and evil!

This,although disgusts me terribly,does not come a surprise...There are a lot of sick people out there...too bad no one actually tries to look beyond their promises before electing them...We have a word in Romania:You sleep as you layed your bed or in other words its OUR(YOUR) vote that counted as a positive remark on their behalfs...

Indeed, Ashu! If your elected leader sucks, you just voted for the wrong guy.

Of course, if you didn't vote.. you should s.t.h.u. about how wronged you are.

Universe wrote:Indeed, Ashu! If your elected leader sucks, you just voted for the wrong guy.

Of course, if you didn't vote.. you should s.t.h.u. about how wronged you are.

Exactly.problem is(here at least)PEOPLE DO NOT VOTE or if they do its mostly old people which will give their vote for anyone who promises a penny+.Above that we don't really have a lot to choose from so...

Too true.
Then again, if you're a hopebringing paragon of morality, you suck too, so.. since there's no pleasing everyone; let's just stick with the lesser of two evils, and shut our eyes to the inanities of their rule.
To do anything else would be silly and hypocritical. All these things.. there's just no good kings left.

I knew the story of Frederic Mitterrand would come here a day or another. Oh well...this dude is indeed a problem (yet the first real problem in France regarding ministers in last years, probably some of you heard the waves of retarded whinning and "making mountains out of molehill" of a SO CALLED racist minister...) and I wouldn't mind to see him go.
BUT to generalize and to make out of him a general being stating that because he is like this, all are like this, would be dumb.
Now, this dude wasn't elected, ministers aren't elected. He was nominated few monthes ago.

I might add that this minister is from socialist party more or less, and he was invited in governement in a desire to diversify the political stances in governement. For those who know, right winged government and president.
His family is controversial, former french president François Mitterrand (uncle of minister if I'm not wrong, said president is dead for long time already) was among the far right leagues when he was young and received a medal from the far right collaboratist government of Vichy during WW2 apparently. Son of said person was caught doing weapons traffic in Africa, had jail sentence.


I got to agree though that people who don't vote have to shut up about outcomes of elections!!!

That too.

I see the link mentions his story, so I felt I would precise things to avoid any assumings that could be false. Thus my edit to clarify.

I also mentionned something else, that some people (the populace and the manipulators from left wing and racism paranoids) also had an issue with what a minister said, considering it as racist (and it spread internationally a month ago). Populace justice being all aware as we know (lmao was a sarcasm) it's always burn the dude he's guilty!

However, here, the minister in your link wrote this so he should assume his acts.

Universe wrote:Too true.
Then again, if you're a hopebringing paragon of morality, you suck too, so.. since there's no pleasing everyone; let's just stick with the lesser of two evils, and shut our eyes to the inanities of their rule.
To do anything else would be silly and hypocritical. All these things.. there's just no good kings left.

Yes but from a good king to a convicted man who beats his fellow politicians or is under investigation for grave offences...there's quite a thick line.I'm no paragon of morality,and i wouldn't want to elect a "perfect" leader nor do i want child molesters and idiots running our country!

P.S.:I hope you were generalizing...

Well, let's not forget Benito Berlusconi as an horrible example of politician..oops I meant Silvio Berlusconi!

Jack wrote:

Universe wrote:Of course, if you didn't vote.. you should s.t.h.u. about how wronged you are.

This statement is simply stupid and nothing more than a sheep echoing the herd.

This statement is simply the statement from someone who doesn't vote and wants to defend his stance for not voting and not s.t.h.u., trying to defend himself from the obviously rational and logical statement expressed by Universe. Trying to move the guilt

"The jury decides that Universe's statement is completly receivable and that Jack's statement will be ignored!"



When you let others act for you, don't try to whine about their choice(s) if you were able to choose, and didn't do so!

"It's a shame what we got! I did nothing to prevent it to happen!"
Quite worse than a SO CALLED sheep echoing the herd!

Jack wrote:

Universe wrote:Of course, if you didn't vote.. you should s.t.h.u. about how wronged you are.

This statement is simply stupid and nothing more than a sheep echoing the herd.

Whatever, cuteface. As long as I can live my life in peace, I don't care whether I am a sheep or a sheepdog, a goddamned wolf pretending to be one, the herdsman or some crazy-assed cloud in the sky singing rainbow songs all day.

Universe wrote:

Jack wrote:

Universe wrote:Of course, if you didn't vote.. you should s.t.h.u. about how wronged you are.

This statement is simply stupid and nothing more than a sheep echoing the herd.

Whatever, cuteface. As long as I can live my life in peace, I don't care whether I am a sheep or a sheepdog, a goddamned wolf pretending to be one, the herdsman or some crazy-assed cloud in the sky singing rainbow songs all day.

Thats rather being part of the problem tbh...
@Apophis - you are biast...

Jack wrote:

Apophis The Great wrote:When you let others act for you, don't try to whine about their choice(s) if you were able to choose, and didn't do so!

But that's just it. Voting does nothing but wastes time.

Wasting time such as giving your voice on who would be next president instead of time that could have been used for starting random msn convos about nothing much? Lolz!
Letting others decide for you -completly-, gives you ZERO right to open your mouth about it! If you don't care to choose, you stay quiet eventually!
Some democratic decisions will take care of the losing part if it's sufficiently numbered enough, some wouldn't. But STILL, people who lost will have more rights to complain than those who did let OTHERS decide for them!

I fail to see the big hooha over the french minister who paid for sex. its no big suprise when you think aobut it, the french have always indulged in whatever they get away with in the past and will continue to do so.

And its no different than paying a hooker somewhere else really, as i've yet to see any conclusive evidence that young = underage for either the country he was in or france.