Page 1 of 2
Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:54 pm
by ~Josh~
viewtopic.php?f=207&t=156118I did NOT post about Lesbians... I did NOT post any filtered words... I did NOT put anything innapropriate. All I said was that its good the post was deleated... and I get a warning? Its a pointless topic ie. Spam. Not innapropriate, a joke. If I used the word Lesbian in a sentence would I get in trouble? No. But I cant in a title??? Come on Jacky-Poo. Dont be angry cause what happend.
BTW Before you say it I did PM you saying I did it for you... as a joke. Because I like to joke around... and I am a child (being 17) so what, what I posted was bad for my age?
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:59 pm
by Jack
~Josh~ wrote:http://talk.gatewa.rs/viewtopic.php?f=207&t=156118
I did NOT post about Lesbians... I did NOT post any filtered words... I did NOT put anything innapropriate. All I said was that its good the post was deleated... and I get a warning? Its a pointless topic ie. Spam. Not innapropriate, a joke. If I used the word Lesbian in a sentence would I get in trouble? No. But I cant in a title??? Come on Jacky-Poo. Dont be angry cause what happend.
BTW Before you say it I did PM you saying I did it for you... as a joke. Because I like to joke around... and I am a child (being 17) so what, what I posted was bad for my age?
According to Jason and Zeratul it is. Your problem is not with me, but with them.
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:01 pm
by ~Josh~
Jack wrote:~Josh~ wrote:http://talk.gatewa.rs/viewtopic.php?f=207&t=156118
I did NOT post about Lesbians... I did NOT post any filtered words... I did NOT put anything innapropriate. All I said was that its good the post was deleated... and I get a warning? Its a pointless topic ie. Spam. Not innapropriate, a joke. If I used the word Lesbian in a sentence would I get in trouble? No. But I cant in a title??? Come on Jacky-Poo. Dont be angry cause what happend.
BTW Before you say it I did PM you saying I did it for you... as a joke. Because I like to joke around... and I am a child (being 17) so what, what I posted was bad for my age?
According to Jason and Zeratul it is. Your problem is not with me, but with them.
Whoevers fault it is, I WANT JUSTICE!!!!!!!
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:02 pm
by Jim
Jack, just so i know, what are you basing you claim that jason and zeratul have a problem with what josh posted on?
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:43 pm
by ~Josh~
So...??? Whats going on???
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:19 pm
by zeekomkommer
i'll look into it tonight when i get home but woudn't it just have been better to change the topic tittle from lesbians to cars ?
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:38 am
by Mordack
~Josh~ wrote:Jack wrote:~Josh~ wrote:http://talk.gatewa.rs/viewtopic.php?f=207&t=156118
I did NOT post about Lesbians... I did NOT post any filtered words... I did NOT put anything innapropriate. All I said was that its good the post was deleated... and I get a warning? Its a pointless topic ie. Spam. Not innapropriate, a joke. If I used the word Lesbian in a sentence would I get in trouble? No. But I cant in a title??? Come on Jacky-Poo. Dont be angry cause what happend.
BTW Before you say it I did PM you saying I did it for you... as a joke. Because I like to joke around... and I am a child (being 17) so what, what I posted was bad for my age?
According to Jason and Zeratul it is. Your problem is not with me, but with them.
Whoevers fault it is, I WANT JUSTICE!!!!!!!
I believe that Jack is referring to Jason's recent ruling that all content on these forums should be PG-13. We, that is to say the admin, have been told that 'soft pornograhy' is no longer acceptable on these forums.
And justice is up to God. The rest of us can only do what we think is right.
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:42 am
by Jim
I could write a letter to the people who decide movie ratings and ask if the word "Lesbians" is allowed or not, but i cant be bothered 
. My guess is that the word its self would be allowed.
My thoughts are the warning should be removed but i dont know what zeek, mordak or bazzy think yet 
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:53 am
by Zeratul
while the limits are approximately PG-13, it is not exact... anything related to porn is not allowed...
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:57 am
by deni
Zeratul wrote:while the limits are approximately PG-13, it is not exact... anything related to porn is not allowed...
That is a vague definition.
Do you consider everything that suggests some form of sexuality "related to porn"?
Or is it only sexually explicit pictures/words that are "related to porn"?
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:02 am
by Juliette
Zeratul wrote:while the limits are approximately PG-13, it is not exact... anything related to porn is not allowed...
lesbians != porn (neither 'hard-', nor 'softcore').
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:16 am
by zeekomkommer
well i actualy read the topic and only the topic title is called lesbians but mainly the guys took it to posting cars. now indeed the defention is vague becausse i beieve children see lesbian couples aswell as we do and some have gay family members. so just the word itself ain't that bad it's just the context in wich it can be used
o btw, shoudn't things like that be anounced first so users know before they get a warning for such a thing. like give it a week to anounce it and after the week you go enforcing it like it should so ppl have the time to know the update rules ?
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:19 am
by Mordack
zeekomkommer wrote:well i actualy read the topic and only the topic title is called lesbians but mainly the guys took it to posting cars. now indeed the defention is vague becausse i beieve children see lesbian couples aswell as we do and some have gay family members. so just the word itself ain't that bad it's just the context in wich it can be used
o btw, shoudn't things like that be anounced first so users know before they get a warning for such a thing. like give it a week to anounce it and after the week you go enforcing it like it should so ppl have the time to know the update rules ?
Shouldn't and wouldn't build no bridges, sadly. This was Jason's decision, and I gather he wanted it done as quickly as possible. These are his forums, and therefore his rules, so the rest of us have to adjust.
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:21 am
by zeekomkommer
well i belgium consumers can ask for a tollerance polecy in where the goverment takes no action on a subject for X amount of time so everyone can adjust and get in line with new regulations. i mean i hadn't even heard of the new strickter rules regarding this until i read it here. so i can understand that users can be pretty suprised about it.
so perhaps instead of warning for it in the first week send the user a pm to explain new rules and edit the topic
Re: Ugh... Jack?
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:31 am
by FreeSpirit
Jason owns these forums therefor his rule is law
Not much that there can be done about it but i personally dont mind a less porny enviorment in some area's. Keep in mind kids read these forums to