Well I was going to create an all-new topic for this, but instead i'd like just to bring back this one. I was doing more thinking about the situation with unbalanced races and reading others posts about the same thing. AND I've come up with this following statement, and I REALLY hope some Goa'uld and Reps argue with me here. I really want to know why it is you guys think this situation is more than fair for the Tauri and Asgard.
For starters (because I know this is what I'll hear about more than anything), the 10% off on the respective weapons I have already found to be a blessing on more than one occasion, so you'll get no arguement that it's a very nice thing to have.
However 2560, the strength of non-attack/defense "bonus" races for their best weapons is 560 more than the asgard attack weapon, and 560 more than the tauri defense weapon.
The best offensive weapon for the Tauri is what, 140 more than 2560? Same goes for the asgard's defense. Plus you could factor in the additional tech upgrade for both races, if somebody wants to do that go ahead... it'd probably factor into something much larger than 140 and all, but i'm just sticking to basics for now.
That's why so many Goa'uld and reps occupy the top slots, overall rank for them is much much easier to fly through than a Tauri or an Asgard (because one aspect of their army, whether it be attack or defense, is almost ALWAYS going to be garbage ... well, relatively speaking at least).
Lemme put it this way. A goa'uld invests, for the sake of simplicity, 1.5x as much naquadah into their defense to match an Asgard, and 1.5x as much to match the offense of a Tauri. That's very nice and all, however you forget that that same Tauri must invest AT LEAST (Usually a lot more... again, the "140 < 560" thing) twice as much in his defense to match yours, same goes for the Asgard regarding their attack. Not to mention the Goa'uld get 25% more naquadah and they have no banking fees... but that's not what we're discussing, is it?
This sounds less like an attack "bonus" and defense "bonus" and more of just a trade-off in where the money is spent. There really is no bonus here, because a good "all around" Asgard / Tauri who maintains every skill is going to end up paying just as much (minus the new 10%, which was a very fair move) and getting less of the overall skill a Goa'uld / Rep has.
When I signed up to be an Asgard, beside the fact I enjoy the race on the show (

), I looked at the "25% defense bonus" and liked the idea. It didn't say "25% defense bonus" and "-30% offense penalty." I very well may have reconsidered upon reading that.
What I propose, and I'm sure (or at least I hope

) many would agree with me here, is that the "560 penalty" is reduced, even slightly, to better even the playing field and make the Asgard's and Tauri's bonus less of a penalty. Honest Reps and Goa'uld must admit there is SOME truth in what I am saying. It is evident when you look at the top 10, overall high ranking is much more commonly owned by the Goa'uld and Reps, despite the fact there are many Tauri and Asgard playing just as good, investing just as much if not more, and still way back, unrecognized.
I know this is a very radical idea, as most players have just come to accept this for what it is. I'm sure lots of Goa'uld and Replicators will say it will make the Tauri and Asgard powerhouses, but that's simply not true. It will give the Tauri and Asgard that by rights,
should be powerhouses the rank they deserve.
WHEW... I guess, through my use in third grade math and stale repetition, I'm just trying to say that for an attack "bonus" and a defense "bonus", it comes with an extremely hefty penalty.
Almost
too extreme (

) ...