Page 1 of 2
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:32 am
by Ashu
Wow...pick one?
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:37 am
by Caprila
Out of the three warnings counted for this ban; Earendil gave the first, I gave the second & Psi gave the third.
The one issued by me, was for his comments in the 'new to the forum' section.
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 9:11 am
by Hoochivette
I know you dont have to but... could you quote or link to it please (the comment)
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 9:58 am
by zeekomkommer
Psi Kiya Trist Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:07 am The following warning was issued to this user
» This is a warning regarding the following post made by you:
viewtopic.php?f=208&p=1957203#p1957203 .
Violation of Rule 5, D.
d. Pornographic and criminal content.
Posting anything of a pornographic nature is not permitted on the SGW forums. Pornographic being defined as: Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal (dictionary.com).
Caprila Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:52 pm The following warning was issued to this user
» This is a warning regarding the following post made by you:
viewtopic.php?f=123&p=1955226#p1955226 .
if you really want me to get myself off on your chest i can do that for you
*
Harch i've came on your chest so many times i can't count don't judge Ian because he likes it too he is just man enough to admit it!!!!
Continued OTT attitude over several posts. Not appropriate or of pg-13 nature, also explained in forum's content rule.
d. Pornographic and criminal content.
Posting anything of a pornographic nature is not permitted on the SGW forums. Pornographic being defined as: Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal (dictionary.com).
Earendil Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:05 pm The following warning was issued to this user
» This is a warning regarding the following post made by you:
viewtopic.php?f=132&p=1908099#p1908099 .
'SS you cry to much"
Section 4: Spam
b. Replies
Replies will be considered spam if they do not contribute to the discussion of the topic. This may include off topic posting or an excessive number of posts that contain nothing more than emoticons or small words such as ‘lol’. While it is appropriate to indicate something is amusing, drowning out a whole thread with such posts makes it hard to follow for all users.
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:29 am
by Jim
Clarification of the warning given by Psi:
Psi Kiya Trist wrote:ToToRo wrote:WWWWWWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MANNNNNNNNN THAT HURTS SO GOOD!!!!!
this, combined with this later in the thread:
ToToRo wrote:but but buttttttt butts oh yummy butts
implies anal sex.
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:57 pm
by zeekomkommer
nice find jim, i coudn't find it cuz the link said i had no acces to that section :s
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:59 pm
by Jim
Yep, i PMed Psi for it straight away when i heard. I knew roket would be back here...
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:04 pm
by deni
You do have dirty minds.
Ever considered that someone else would not have made the connection?
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:45 pm
by zeekomkommer
well the warning given by caprilla is pretty straight forward and is language thats not pg-13 but the warning psi gave is rather dodgy to me.
i mean it's not explict, it's not entended to erouse
and honestly i hadn't made the link yet until i read jims post
and it's also the first warning given for combining 2 lose posts. where was this post even made (link realy doesn't work for me :s)
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:47 pm
by Jim
I believe, n their own the posts do not seem adequate for a warning. A verbal probably should have been issued first to stop the trend of semi-rude posts.
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:53 pm
by Q Man
but i do believe he deserves it for constant spam and explicit content, it may only deserve a warning if he hadn't already recieved warnings for similar stuff, it just seems that hes pushing the limits by repetitive breaking of the rules.
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:56 pm
by Jim
Constant Spam? in the spam section? Is that a warnable offense?
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:58 pm
by Q Man
its not only in the temple though, i've seen it throughout the forums, he does seems to cause constant hassle for alot of the moderators.
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:27 pm
by Jim
Earendil wrote:Also to put this into light (here)
it may be a bit older but it does show that he has been talked to about this before, and this one is recorded
Solus xxxx Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:51 pm Entry added:
» insulted other users in a sexual way. not exactly a HUGE offence but edit needed.
next time - warn.
Eary, it could be argued that has very little to do with this warning. Roket could easily have taken it to mean (and probably did) "dont insult people in a sexual way again". He was being nice to people in a sexual way this time.
I had a quick look for where the posts were but couldnt find them.
At the time there was heavy spamming going on and a lot of "man love" between various people. Thats the context i can remember.
Re: Totoro
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 8:34 pm
by Byrnes
Hes my friend but hes always getting banned it kinda makes him self look bad and maybe makes the moderators not give him second chances i hope what i said helped.